The Templar-Masonic-Zionist Tradition Of Solomon’s Temple

Robert Wolfe in The New England Review:

“Tuchman, in Bible And Sword, saw a connection between Protestantism, rejection of Papal authority and Christian Zionism.

As she put it on page 80, Wherever the Reformation took hold the Bible replaced the Pope as the final spiritual authority. The Palestinian origins of Christianity were stressed more and more in order to reduce the pretensions of Rome

The Masons too claimed “Palestinian origins,” and pre-Christian ones at that. Their focus on the rebuilding of the Temple could and did align them even more closely with the Jews than non-Masonic Protestants. But it would prove little to put together a list of all the Masons who associated themselves with the Zionist concept in some way. Such a list would be difficult to compile in any case due to the extreme reluctance of historians of Zionism to look into the Masonic connection.

This reluctance is a natural reaction to the anti-Semitic charges of a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy.

[Lila: Which makes me suspect that indeed there is some factual basis to the “conspiracy”…]

Zionism certainly

[Lila: What is certain about this?]

did not grow out of a conspiracy, whether Judeo-Masonic or any other. It was a broadly based movement rooted in 3000 years of Jewish history

[Lila: Where is the proof?]

The question is rather whether Judeo-Masonic thought tended to create a favorable context for the success of the Zionist movement. This question clearly has to be answered in the affirmative.

[Lila: Aha. So the preceding paragraph was simply to distance himself from any charge of anti-Semitism, while admitting that the “anti-Semites” do indeed have evidence for their assertions!]

That Freemasonry was inherently favorable to Zionism is suggested by the fact that the three main supporters of the Zionist movement in modern times, England, France and the United States, were also the three main centers of Freemasonry. In the United States, today Israel’s strongest supporter, at least 13 Presidents have been Freemasons, including Harry Truman, who was responsible for United States recognition of Israel in 1948.

Freemasonry helped to create a receptive climate for Zionism by its legitimation of Judaism, by its association with movements for national independence and above all by its focus on the Temple. Although this focus could be interpreted in many different ways, it was difficult to resist the implication that the Jews would have to participate in some manner in the rebuilding of the Temple. This view in turn conditioned Freemasons to accept the Zionist movement when it arose among Jews in the 19th and 20th centuries. Zionism was in no sense their creation

[Lila: But it’s clear from the historical record that Zionism did spring out of Masonic conspiracy]

but without their aid its success would have been considerably less likely.

The Temple

That the Temple was central to Freemasonry from the start is shown by Stevenson in “The Origins Of Freemasonry.” After a thorough examination of the few references to Freemasonry in 17th century Scottish texts, Stevenson concluded that the early Scottish lodges were consecrated to the memory of the Temple. He put it this way, on page 149:

The lodge of the early Scottish masons was clearly intended to be Solomon’s Temple. It does not seem to have been mentally furnished with the pillars of the temple, but they were present through the use of their names as secret words, and the references to the lodge being orientated like the temple and to the first lodge having been held in the temple porch help stress this identification – as does the grave of Hiram, the temple’s architect. This being the case, the “work” to which the master puts the masons in the lodge was presumably regarded as symbolising the building of the temple. In the religious literature of the day “building the Temple” was frequently used as a synonym for building the new Jerusalem, the creation of a true godly community.

Stevenson’s testimony is all the more suggestive in that it never occurred to him that this focus on the Temple might have derived from the Templars. Stevenson also had no interest in a Jewish connection, but noted on page 133 that a 1689 Scottish text referred to the “Mason Word” as a “Rabbinical mystery.” Stevenson theorized that “as the words of the Mason Word were connected with Solomon’s Temple it was natural to connect their use with Jewish tradition.”

The point about the Temple is that it symbolized not only “the creation of a true godly community” but also it was built at the height of the power and prestige of the kingdom of Judah and it survived only so long as the Jewish people was able to defend it.

Physical force was also the main concern of the Templars, who were a military order who engaged in constant military training. Physical force was also a prominent element in Masonic culture, as shown by the long list of generals and other military men who were Masons. It is just this point which makes Robinson’s theory of the origins of the Freemasons so plausible. Wat Tyler’s rebellion was also an expression of physical force, and one which was remarkably well organized and destructive. It is hard to understand how a group of neo-Platonic mystics could have given rise to most of the great revolutionary movements of the 18th and 19th centuries, but it is easy to see how a radical underground formed by ex-Templars might have done so.

The moral of the story is that the Temple matters. The modern Zionist movement paid little attention to the issue of the Temple, and yet it has continually surfaced all the same. The seizure of the Temple Mount by the Israeli armed forces during the Six Day War in 1967 was viewed by many as a dream come true. Since 1967 Israel has marked time, retaining physical control of the Temple Mount but leaving its administration entirely in the hands of Muslim authorities. Forty years have elapsed in this manner, but forty years are but a moment in the 3000 year history of the Temple and its legend. Sooner or later the issue of the Temple will have to be addressed. Who will decide its future – Jews, Muslims, Christians, the United Nations? To me it appears equally inconceivable that the Temple Mount will remain entirely Muslim or that an entirely Jewish “Third Temple” will replace the existing Islamic structures. Some compromise will have to be devised, but what this compromise might be no one really knows. One thing is for sure the Judeo-Masonic concept of the rebuilding of the Temple remains very much alive, and much depends on how this concept will be translated into practice in the years to come. “

Ron Paul’s Zionist Non-Interventionism

Updated May 30, 2014:

I need to clarify and correct a couple of things in this post.  By Zionist I mean, supporting greater Israeli ambitions, either overtly or covertly, with a hegemonic role for the Judaicized Christian church or for Judaism alone.  One can support Israel on certain things and not wish for its dissolution but not be a Zionist in this sense.  I don’t use Zionist to mean simply “in favor of a homeland for the Jews.”

I think I was mistaken about Walter Block.  I read that Dr. Block opposes Israeli adventurism.

(Reposted, with more details..incomplete)

I will be trying to find the names of Ron Paul’s closest advisors to substantiate my increasingly certain belief that Ron Paul is a Zionist non-interventionist, i.e., that his non-interventionism is in the services of Zionism.

Thus he criticizes Obama in a recent piece:

“For example, instead of seeking proper authority from Congress and the Constitution to go to war with Libya, President Obama empowered the United Nations and the Arab League, two bodies that together endanger the security and sovereignty of our ally Israel.”

This is Israel-First, not America-First. Why? Because Congress is bought and sold by the Zionists/Israelis and the Supreme Court and constitution have become thoroughly politicized as well.

In that context, letting the regional powers of the ME and the modern equivalent of the concert of nations have an active influence on the outcome in Palestine is more likely to produce peace and stability than simply asserting unipolar American (read Zionist) interests.

[ On 24 April 2004, Uri Avnery wrote:

“Everybody understands that Vanunu has no more secrets. What can a technician know after 18 years in jail, during which technology has advanced with giant steps?

“But gradually it becomes clear what the security establishment is really afraid of. Vanunu is in a position to expose the close partnership with the United States in the development of Israel’s nuclear armaments.

“This worries Washington so much, that the man responsible in the State Department for ‘arms control’, Under-Secretary John Bolton, has come to Israel in person for the occasion. Vanunu, it appears, can cause severe damage to the mighty super-power.

“The Americans, it seems, are very worried. The Israeli security services have to dance to their tune. The world must be prevented by all available means from hearing, from the lips of a credible witness, that the Americans are full partners in Israel’s nuclear arms program, while pretending to be the world’s sheriff for the prevention of nuclear proliferation.”]

Second. When a third of the House Republicans introduced HR 1553 endorsing an Israeli strike on Iran, RP didn’t vote for, but he didn’t vote against, either. He didn’t vote, period.

Third.  John Bolton, far right Zionist, has urged that ME issues be laid out in terms of Israeli self-defense.

RP has always done this.

Fourth: RP’s record is strongly pro-Israel when you examine the details. He was the only vote in support of Israel when it hit the Iranian Osirak reactor in 1981.

One web commentator analyzes his record:

QUOTE:

“In October 2002,  Paul did vote against the Iraq War Resolution, H.J. Res. 114 but it came only after military action had already begun in the Mideast. On September 14, 2001, Ron Paul voted for H.J.RES.64 To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.”  H.J. Res. 64 was approved and the Senate approved S.J. Res. 23, “Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists.”

.J.RES.64 and S.J. Res. 23 provided Congressional authorization for the October 7, 2001 invasion of Afghanistan: “Operation Enduring Freedom, the official name used by the U.S. Government for its War in Afghanistan, together with three smaller military actions, under the umbrella of its Global War on Terror.” (“Operation Enduring Freedom) Ron Paul was more than a day late and a dollar shortlike one year, several billions of dollars and thousands of human lives too late. By the time Ron Paul voted against the War in Iraq in October of 2002, U.S. action in the Middle East was well underway. Where was Congressman Pauls passionate anti-war rhetoric in September of 2001?

Ron Paul reveals his true Zionist colors by maintaining that Islamic terrorists destroyed the Twin Towers on 9-11, and that the U.S. Military should be used against them. Why are we taking precious military and intelligence resources away from tracking down those who did attack the United Statesand who may again attack the United Statesand using them to invade countries that have not attacked the United States? 22. (Ron Paul Speaks, fn. 22 Ron Paul, “Questions That Won’t Be Asked About Iraq,” U.S. House of Representatives, Sept. 10, 2002.)”

END OF QUOTE

In 2002, he passed a motion to declare war on Iraq, to make the point that Congress had the power to declare war.

Fifth. RP has not stood in the way of the Zionist domination of the media/finance/government in America or openly confronted the massive criminality of the Zionist oligarchy.

In sum, it seems more likely that any ending of support for Israel is merely a way to hasten the Pax Judaica on to its next phase, when Eretz Israel is achieved.

And so, for RP to say he wouldn’t intervene in a battle between Israel and Iran is meaningless.

Israel: 300 nuclear weapons, extreme Zionist control of three countries – US, UK, Israel,  dominance in several European nuclear countries, dominance among secret spy agencies, global corporate dominance, stranglehold over all financial, drug, and sex crime flows

and

Iran: no weapons, nuclear program disrupted by Stuxnet virus (attributed by many to Israelis); no regional or world dominance, thoroughly infiltrated, surrounded by chaotic states dominated by US/Israel

Can you be  hands off in a battle between a three year old and a man-eating tiger with a bevy of man-eating leopards behind it? Especially when it was you who fed the tiger, you who brought the tiger to the house, you who fought the boy’s family, when it sought to protect him, you who disarmed the boy’s father, you who raped the boy’s mother, and you who took even the stone from the little boy’s hand?

Ron Paul is FOR America and the American side in the war between Israel and Palestine, he says?

Really? Then why did he not stand up against the Zionists when they went to war against America – as they did in the Lavon affair, or in the attack on the Liberty,  or in the Pollard affair, through Goldman Sachs and its multiple megabillion global frauds, and through Mossad/AIPAC espionage or through ADL ‘s Cheka-style monitoring and threats?

Ron Paul is on the side of America, only if you believe that America is Zion and Zion is America.

If that is so, then, indeed he is on the American side….which is the Zionist side… which is also the Israeli side.

Now to go back to figuring out RP’s advisors.

So far, I’ve come across only two people listed as close advisors in this campaign.

One is senior Mises scholar  Walter Block,  economics advisor  during the 2008 campaign.

The other is the recent and controversial addition, Bruce Fein – legal advisor.

Block is an avowed Zionist, while Fein is also said to be a Zionist, but a more covert one.

One ardent RP supporter is financial manager, Peter Schiff, but I don’t know if Schiff, who raised money for Paul in the 2008 campaign and was his economic advisor, holds any official position with his 2012 campaign. Schiff too is a Zionist, but pretty straightforward about it, and well-regarded by colleagues.

Here are other names mentioned by Ron Paul in 2007 as possible additions to a future administration.

John Stossel, ABC reporter  [RP says he’d be in charge of consumer affairs];  Walter Williams, UPenn  faculty (neo-conservative, fully on board the Global War on (some) Terror) [ RP would put him in charge of economics]; James Grant, Barron’s financial columnist, hard money columnist [RP wanted him for Secretary of Treasury]; Robert Pape; Michael Scheuer (ex-CIA).

Paul has also given a shout out to constitutional law professor and media expert Jonathan Turley (a favorite of mine) and to judge Andrew Napolitano.

Block, Napolitano,  Schiff,  and Williams, are staples in libertarian circles. Stossel is a more mainstream libertarian. Grant is a senior figure in the hard money crowd; Turley is a well-known civil libertarian and the only one who has shown any open anti-Zionist leanings.

Of course, these aren’t advisors, but possible picks in a Paul administration, but they do give an idea of the direction of his thinking.

What is interesting is that all of them are media personalities, each in his own right (no women, you’ll notice). They are all established authors and make the lecture/TV or YouTube circuit. In that sense, this list is a very media savvy one, since everyone on it commands name recognition and would bring in their own following.

I am not sure what that means in other ways, though. Perhaps it means that media clout rather than credibility in office is Paul’s main aim. Perhaps it means something else.

What follows now is an assessment of the potential and credibility of Paul’s choices in a libertarian administration. My considerations are limited to two things –  Zionism and professional integrity.

(Note: None of this is a personal attack on these figures. I wish them all well)

John Stossel, well-known for his investigations into government corruption, manages to be not too libertarian (remember that thing about force AND FRAUD?) when it comes to the vast bankster-speculator-regulation fraud going on for the last 20 years at least. He ignores it.

A Jewish libertarian, a major mainstream figure, who has never talked about the financiers but has gone on about government corruption?

Verdict – Zionist. Fails smell test for professional integrity. Probably competent.

Walter Williams Zionist. Supports GWOT.

Fails smell test for professional integrity (Sorry, you don’t get to call yourself libertarian and then sign onto perpetual war.  I don’t know enough to assess his professional competence.

Walter BlockZionist (see above).  (more later)

Peter Schiff Zionist (see above). Wrote “Crash Proof,” warning of inflationary excesses in market.

Passes smell test for professional integrity and competence.

Bruce Fein Zionist and suspected Israeli agent (see Boiling Frogs Post).

Lobbyist with suspect ties and ethical infractions. Strongly civil libertarian but appears to be opportunistic.

Fails smell test for professional integrity. Passes for competence.

Jim Grant –  Doyen of hard-money crowd, columnist for major Wall Street magazine, Barron’s (Barron’s is owned by the hedge-fund crowd and is the home of the criminal short-selling cabal, see Deep Capture), author of adulatory biography of Zionist financier, Bernard Baruch, lives in Brooklyn. None of that sounds too encouraging from the point of view of the average Joe, but, Grant has sounded a consistent note of skepticism about the market and predicted a day of reckoning. So while he is a possible Zionist,he passes the smell test for professional integrity and competence.

Andrew Napolitano – Libertarian constitutional scholar, judge and media personality.

Michael Scheuer – ex-CIA, has written vehemently against the Zionist agenda and neoconservatives (but then, so has Bruce Fein). Scheuer  was the man on the job during the biggest intelligence failure in US history. That and his kiss-and-squeal book gives him a “fail” for professional competence.

The jury is out as far as professional integrity goes, but I tend to suspect mainstream figures who spout “anti-Semitic” stuff too glibly.  Like all those fake-Jihadi sites.

Oh, and his “OBL did it, did it, did too do it,”  subtext suggests  “limited hang-out” to some observers.

[Anti-Zionist activist, Maidhc O’ Cathail points out why].

Robert Pape: At least, Pape did a good thing by showing that suicide bombing was not invented by Islamicists and is not peculiar to them. It is in fact uncommon and motivated world-wide by strategic considerations rather than religious fundamentalism.

What is interesting is that the two people RP names both have a professional interest in terrorism. Pape’s research into the subject is considered paradigm shifting. He has done extensive work on the group that invented suicide bombing. the Marxist Tamil Tigers, and  Fein has been a lobbyist for the Tigers since 2008, after lobbying against them from 2004 until 2007.

The selection of two people whose professional activities relate to terrorism suggests that even if the US is contemplating withdrawal from the Middle East (after having secured Israeli military domination and destabilized the area), it will be engaging in more intervention in another area (read South Asia), where terrorism is rife.

Non-intervention in Palestine then is just another word for nothing left to gain there and more to come in Pakistan-India (Islamic terrorism, LTT terrorism, Maoist/Naxalite terrorism, Naga terrorism).

Says Pape, who heads up the Chicago Project on Security and Terrorism:

“Even if al-Qaeda becomes a thing of the past, that doesn’t mean terrorism will disappear. This field has become a key component of the academic world, and it will continue to contribute to our understanding of world events in the future.”

Pape’s other writing (on the uses of air power and the efficacy of economic sanctions, among others) tends toward a realist and conservative use of force, one that limits itself to sharply circumscribed circumstances and methods. Nothing not to like here.

But, not unexpectedly, his research doesn’t seem to run to the deep structures (drugs, crime, mafias, covert operations) that more and more dominate the actual conduct of politics.

Political sympathies unknown. Passes the smell test for professional integrity and competence.

 

Antony Sutton On Suppressed History

Antony Sutton:

“We trace the extraordinary Skull and Bones influence in a major Hegelian conflict: Naziism vs. Communism. Skull and Bones members were in the dominant decision-making positions — Bush, Harriman, Stimson, Lovett, and so on — all Bonesmen, and instrumental in guiding the conflict through use of “right” and “left.” They financed and encouraged the growths of both philosophies and controlled the outcome to a significant extent. This was aided by the “reductionist” division in science, the opposite of historical “wholeness.” By dividing science and learning into narrower and narrower segments, it became easier to control the whole through the parts.

In education, the Dewey system was initiated and promoted by Skull and Bones members. Dewey was an ardent statist, and a believer in the Hegelian idea that the child exists to be trained to serve the State. This requires suppression of individualist tendencies and a careful spoon-feeding of approved knowledge.

…This manipulation of “left” and “right” on the domestic front is duplicated in the international field where “left” and “right” political structures are artificially constructed and collapsed in the drive for a one-world synthesis.

College textbooks present war and revolution as more or less accidental results of conflicting forces. The decay of political negotiation into physical conflict comes about, according to these books, after valiant efforts to avoid war. Unfortunately, this is nonsense. War is always a deliberate creative act by individuals.

Western textbooks also have gigantic gaps. For example, after World War II the Tribunals set up to investigate Nazi war criminals were careful to censor any materials recording Western assistance to Hitler. By the same token, Western textbooks on Soviet economic development omit any description of the economic and financial aid given to the 1917 Revolution and subsequent economic development by Western firms and banks.

Revolution is always recorded as a spontaneous event by the politically or economically deprived against an autocratic state. Never in Western textbooks will you find the evidence that revolutions need finance and the source of the finance in many cases traces back to Wall Street.

Consequently it can be argued that our Western history is every bit as distorted, censored, and largely useless as that of Hitler’s Germany or the soviet Union or Communist China. No western foundation will award grants to investigate such topics, few Western academics can “survive” by researching such theses and certainly no major publisher will easily accept manuscripts reflecting such arguments.”

Paul’s Support Is From The Left, Independents, and Dems, Not Republicans

This explains why RP fans seem to cater to the speculator class and students, who tend toward the left:

“The Washington Post reports today that Manilow, while impressed by Paul, “loves the president” and plans on pulling the lever for his reelection in 2012.

Paul’s supporters have often wondered why his support seems so strong in the general public discourse but does not translate into support in scientific Republican polls (with Harris Interactive results aside, for reasons I outline in that post).

The answer can be found in Manilow’s flip flop—many of Paul’s most ardent supporters are not Republican primary voters. Often, his supporters are independent, libertarian or soft Democrats that plan to reregister Republican in order to vote for Paul in closed primaries – those voters are not registered in polls of registered Republicans.”

My Comment:

Here we see another illustration of the danger of mass action, whether political or promotional in its aim. It dilutes its message and ends up appealing to people whose aims and interests are perhaps far from yours.

But this no longer matters, because the idea is to be all things to all people. Thus, mass action means you necessarily appeal to the common denominator, omitting some things from your agenda, and elevating others. You begin to adopt slogans, you begin to resist thought too deep for popular approval. You demonize  all foes, all critics, and eventually criticism itself.

Unfortunately, those are just the problems with politics itself.  To become what you fight in order to fight better is absurdity at its very core.

Not that absurd things might not be able to prevail in the short-term.  But such logical and moral contradictions have a knack of ripening into poison.

That has been my own personal experience.  A compromise that seemed a reasonable trade off in the beginning,  reveals itself  soon enough to be a tectonic movement in the moral foundation on which I thought I stood.

For, while I have always tried to follow my own conscience, and while it has been far stricter in certain areas than any demands made by convention or religion, that “in certain things” betrays a crucial problem.

What our perception and intuition sees as the moral imperative of the moment frequently turns out not to be. Some other area of our lives, one we thought we had mastered, or one in which we felt so secure that, like a left-handed Tantrist, we thought we could use “beyond good and evil”, turns out to have resisted our command after all.

One imprudent association leads to another. One compromise makes the next look easier.  Pretty soon, we begin to detest our critics and imagine them motivated by envy or malice or self-hatred, because their vision of our projects does not match the grandiosity of our own.

Especially is this true of those who have fought long, lonely battles, far from center-stage and invariably with the malodorous slanders of frauds and fools ringing in their ear, as RP has.

We feel for him and for his long-term supporters.

We know what it is like to see honest motives disparaged by those who would not recognize truth if it descended, thousand-eyed and many-winged, with a fiery coal at its lips.  In our small way, we know what it is like to have to fight and refight the same intellectual battles over and over, because those who wield the badge of authority also write the official histories. We know what it is like to see something you love – whether your country, your history, or even your own words – turned into its opposite by slippery-tongued opportunists.

But even so, reason, not feeling, must be our guide, because it is feeling, not reason, that is the culprit. It is feeling that drives the masses to demand more and more from their masters and it is feeling that traps them in the vicious cycle of consumption and debt.

Our masters, on the other hand, operate with cold reasoning, moving us like pawns on their chessboard precisely because they stay detached from the panics and deliriums of the moment.

Mass man feels, and his feelings shift with the moment. His masters think, however soullessly, and their thinking builds a vision over centuries that stretches far into the future, into eternity.

Those who seek to undo such far-reaching plans would do well to harness their feelings to their mind and tune their eyes farther than the familiar horizons of national politics.

Nobel Nomination For Assange, Manning, Arab Spring Blogger

Julian Assange and Bradley Manning are on the list of this year’s nominees for the Nobel Prize. Can’t say it matters much to me one way or other, considering Barack Obama got the prize. And some Arab Spring bloggers made the list too. I wonder why they didn’t just hand Soros the prize and have done with it.

All in the service of establishing credible nongovernmental voices that can herd the masses in the direction they’re supposed to go, while posturing as a cross between “V” and Jesus Christ.

Anarchists For The New World Order. Buy your T-shirt and autographed mug here.

Despite all the hoopla about the WL revelations, I’ve been unimpressed overall. I will take any book by Antony Sutton over the whole WL oeuvre, soap opera, Passion play or whatever you want to call it.

Yawn.

The True Tiger Of The Tamils

From the website of Ramana Maharishi:

“Not only good people went to the Ashram. Sometimes bad ones turned up also – even bad sadhus. Twice in the year 1924 thieves broke into the Ashram in quest of loot. On the second of these occasions they even beat the Maharshi, finding that there was very little for them to take away. When one of the devotees sought the sage’s permission to punish the thieves, the sage forbade him, saying:

“They have their dharma, we have ours. It is for us to bear and forbear. Let us not interfere with them.” When one of the thieves gave him a blow on the left thigh, he told him: “If you are not satisfied you can strike the other leg also.” After the thieves had left, a devotee enquired about the beating. The sage remarked, “I also have received some puja,” punning on the word in Tamil (poosai) which means ‘worship’ but is also used to mean ‘blows’. The spirit of utter    harmlessness   that   permeated  the  sage  and made even animals and birds make friends with him. He showed them the same consideration that he did to the humans that went to him. When he referred to any of them, he used the form ‘he’ or ‘she’ and not ‘it’. Birds and squirrels built their nests around him. Cows, dogs and monkeys found asylum in the Ashram. All of them behaved intelligently – especially the cow Lakshmi. He knew their ways quite intimately. He would see to it that they were fed properly and well. And, when any of them died, the body would be buried with due ceremony.”

Shock: Well-Heeled Activists Indulge In Self-Serving Circle Jerks

Sibel Edmonds at Boiling Frogs Post:

“This morning I was very surprised to find at AntiWar.Com a long marketing piece written on an infamous Lap-Dog Watch-Dog. Written by an apparently ignorant contributor, Kelley Vlahos, the piece is filled with highly selective and sugar-coated promotional misinformation. Missing from this PR piece for this corporate NGO was its $4 million backing by George Soros, Rockefeller family members, Carnegie, and numerous ‘Secret & Classified’ corporate backers. That’s not all. For a site that has been promoting itself as anti government secrecy, Antiwar.Com’s not-so-bright Vlahos conveniently blacks out POGO’s record on supporting the Obama administration’s retaliation against whistleblowers, his pro secrecy actions, and his anti transparency campaign since day one of his presidency….”

Edmonds also adds this personal note:

“I have been a supporter of AntiWar.Com for many years. We have common readership with them here at Boiling Frogs Post. Granted, it’s been highly annoying to find more and more mainstream media (especially NY Times & Washington Post) generated news roundups at their website in the last few months, and less and less presentation of alternative voices. However, this one really goes beyond the level of my tolerance; as it should with many of their readers who have been dishing out $400,000 a year for them to remain an alternative. I hope their contributors will take this into consideration two months from now when they start beating the ‘help sustain us’ drum.  I know I am not going to support the next round until I see some signs of positive change…at least back to where they were before.”

French Jewish Defense League In West Bank..

Boiling Frogs Post:

“While Israeli authorities are making it increasingly difficult for non-violent international activists to visit the West Bank, suspected Jewish terrorists — members of the Jewish Defense League (JDL) — coming from France in recent days apparently had no difficulty reaching the illegal settlements which they claim they want to defend.

The FBI has described the JDL as a “right-wing terrorist group“. One of its most infamous charter members was Baruch Goldstein who attack unarmed Palestinian Muslim worshipers at a mosque in Hebron in 1994, killing 29 and wounding 125 others. On its website, the JDL says “We do not consider his assault to qualify under the label of terrorism,” in reference to Goldstein’s Hebron attack — they also describe him as “a brilliant surgeon, a mild-mannered Yeshiva-educated man.”

The Coming Of Dajjal

Shaykh Imran Hosein:

“Three stages of a master-plan

This essay suggests the existence of three basic stages in a mysteriously unfolding master-plan through which Israel seeks to realize her messianic destiny. The master-plan is culminating at this time when the so-called ‘chosen people’ have been brought back from 2000 years of exile to reclaim the Holy Land as their own. Their ultimate destiny, they believe, is to rule the world from what would appear to be a restored Biblical Holy State of Israel located in the Holy Land. That ultimate destiny appears soon to be realized, and so it is time enough for our readers to try to understand the subject from the perspective of Islam. In explaining those three stages of the master plan we can, in fact, also explain much of the history of international politics and economics over the last few centuries.

In the first stage, which lasted for a long time, a Pax Britanica world-order waged strange colonial wars on the rest of the world and eventually and cleverly succeeded in ‘liberating’ the Holy Land from benevolent Muslim rule, and in presiding over the birth of the imposter Euro-Jewish State of Israel. Along the way the world witnessed the strange and otherwise inexplicable event of a secular Britain pledging, in the Balfour Declaration of 1917, the secular British Government’s commitment to deliver a national homeland in the Holy Land to the Jewish people. Our thesis offers to readers an explanation for that mysterious British obsession with the Holy Land.

We must also carefully note that in the effort to establish itself as the ruling State in the world, Britain had to take the initial steps towards control of the world’s money. (See the writer’s seminar on ‘Islam and Money’ available on his website.) And so the British Sterling pound became the international currency, and Britain became the money-lender par excellence of the world. This was a unique event in monetary history.

Then in the second stage of that master-plan – a stage which is still in progress and which would last for a shorter time than the first – a Pax Americana world-order replaced Pax Britanica and proceeded to mysteriously protect the arrogant, aggressive and expansionist Euro-Jewish State with countless UN Security Council’s vetoes. That world-order has also been waging wars on Israel’s behalf in order to make the world safe for Israel to grow into a nuclear-armed super-power. Instead of the spectacular colonial wars which delivered to Britain the status of a ruling State, it took two world wars to bring about the transfer of power from the first to the second ruling State.

Our thesis offers to readers an explanation for that equally mysterious American obsession with the Holy Land.

There was, in addition, a monetary component to the process of emergence of USA as the second ruling State since the US dollar replaced the Sterling pound as the international currency, and USA became the money-lender par excellence of the world.

The history of these two ruling States, Britain and USA, suggests that whoever could achieve control over the world’s money, could also control the world. Control over money could be used to prevent the circulation of wealth through the economy, thus ensuring that the rich remained permanently rich and the poor were imprisoned in permanent poverty. Control over money could also be used to buy the allegiance of the rich who would grow constantly richer, and who would join the oppressor and assist him in controlling the world. It would also reduce the poor to such destitution that they would become immobilized and be unable to resist oppression. That is precisely the state of the world today and it constitutes a critically important goal of the master-plan.

And then in the third, final and briefest stage of the master-plan, a Pax Judaica world-order is about to replace Pax Americana. The passage from the second to the third and final ruling State in the master-plan is again taking place through a series of strange wars. Israel would soon replace USA as the ruling State in the world and when that occurs, a Jew would eventually rule the world from Jerusalem and claim to be the true Messiah! But he would not be Jesus the true Messiah. Rather, Prophet Muhammad explained that he would be Dajjal the false Messiah (Anti-Christ).

We are now very close indeed to the culmination of that devilish master-plan that has been ominously unfolding ever since the island Britain startled the world a few centuries ago by becoming the first ruling State in post-Biblical history (i.e., since David and Solomon created the world’s first ruling State).

Terrorism and the master-plan

The passage from the first to the second stage of the master-plan was initiated through an act of carefully planned terrorism, i.e., the assassination of the Grand Duke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary in Sarajevo in the summer of 1914. Those who planned the assassination (was Trotsky part of the plot?) also planted false footprints at the crime-scene that led to Russia. It paved the way for the First World War which, in turn, was successfully used to dismember the Ottoman Islamic Empire and to liberate the Holy Land.

The passage from the second to the third stage of the master-plan was also initiated through an act of less-carefully planned terrorism, i.e., the 9/11 terrorist attack on America. This time around the false footprints that were planted at the crime-scene led to Arabs and Muslims, and that created opportunities for an arrogant and power-drunk USA and its Euro-allies to wage a series of wars (still in progress) and to eventually impose total control over the world’s major oil resources that were not already controlled, – hence American war on Afghanistan and Iraq, and Israeli wars on Lebanon, Gaza Strip, and eventually Syria and Iran. War on Venezuela as well seems inevitable, and that, perhaps, explains the haste with which the ruling tribe in Trinidad and Tobago is seeking to establish its tribal dictatorship.

Today’s wars also allow USA/Israel to eventually control the new electronic money-system of the world that would soon replace paper money when the US dollar collapses. Anti-terrorism legislation and war on terrorism (which is a euphemism for war on Islam) would eventually pave the way, in the name of international security, for the imposition of a new international monetary system of electronic money. That monetary system would make the world even safer for Israel since anyone who dared to oppose Israel could be targeted as a terrorist and could have his wealth electronically short-circuited.

The most important point this essay makes is the world is now located at that moment in time when stage two of the master-plan is culminating and stage three is commencing…”

My Comment:

Being no scholar of Islam, I cannot tell how authentic the Shaykh’s interpretation of the Muslim prophecies are. I note that he is a graduate of the prestigious Geneva Institute of International Studies, from which leading globalist figures..and figure-heads…like Kofi Annan have emerged.  I note his resume, which includes ten years residence in New York City, weekly sermons at the United Nations, and participation in inter-faith dialogue with Jews and Christians.

I note that apocalyptic musings of all kinds feed the intransigence and mysticism from which revolutionary and counter-revolutionary movements spring. I note that revolution and counter-revolution, like booms and busts, can be played very profitably, by nimble arms-merchants, spooks, counter-spooks, corporate-states, merchant traders, and pirate-raiders…

A Second Israel In Asia

From John Kaminski [Note: Kaminski is a Holocaust revisionist, perhaps a denialist. I don’t know.

It is not a field about which I know more than the conventional wisdom, although I’m aware of the controversies around it. But to honor my own commitment to really PC-free speech on vital matters, I decided to publish this piece anyway, since the topic is riveting to anyone interested in that part of the world. Again, I make no assertions about its veracity or even plausibility:

“A second “nation” of Israel today is nearing completion smack dab in the middle of the world’s premier drug producing region, the Golden Triangle of Burma — located right on the border between India and the military dictatorship now known as Myanmar, which is the real model of the human future.

Activities presaging the creation of a second Israeli state are well-known in India, but not elsewhere. Most everyone remembers how the first Israel popped onto the world scene in 1948 and has continued mass murdering its neighbors and hapless nations that fall under its sway ever since.

Precisely, political stealth moves over the last three decades and an aggressive outreach effort by “rabbis from Israel” to convert inhabitants of the three easternmost provinces of India to Judaism have been reported for years by Indian patriots in the Himalayan foothills who seek to return their country to its much longed for pre-British liberty.

The Deccan Chronicle, a newspaper in Hyderabad, reported that by means of “a ritual bath,” rabbis promise penniless Christian, Muslim and pagan converts a trip to Israel and preferred employment status, then buy votes of peasants, take over local boards and pass laws to legalize their manipulations, the same way they do everywhere else.

While the core issue in this geopolitical expansion of Rothschild-Rockefeller money empire that controls the world is proximity to the centuries old center of opium production run by the generals in Myanmar, the creation of a new Israeli state in the exact center of China, India and Southeast Asia augurs badly for the peoples of the region, as the current level of destabilization among Israel’s neighbors in the Middle East clearly illustrates.

And not to be forgotten is that the world’s oldest still functioning oil field is located in this area and Tripura state is reported to be floating on a sea of natural gas.

This is a history that would shame Americans if they knew about it.

Back in World War II, the Burma Road was essentially built with American taxpayer money to provide an alternate route to ship opium out of China because of the Japanese blockade.

Vietnam vet and author Philip Ledoux writes:

“The Burma Road was built by America and France under the guise of humanitarian aid to the Chinese government. On the return trip, the Americans supplied and manned trucks hauled out of the Bay of Bengal hundreds of metric tons of Chinese white opium for the international markets.”

Bharat patriots in the Himalayan state of of Himachal Pradesh today describe the region as the new pot growing capital of the world, with Israelis in every community guiding the industry clear on up to the Indo-Tibetan border.

The latest news from that beautiful border area is this. Dharamshala became Tibetan Dalai Lama’s de facto capital ever since the Chinese annexed Tibet. Some of the world’s most high profile leaders and Hollywood stars (like Richard Gere) are regular visitors.

In these peaceful parts, what are 20,000-plus Israelis doing? Many in Manali town and its surrounding villages speak Hebrew. Near Dharamshala no less than 10 villages have been taken over by the Israelis. It has long been known that the Dalai Lama gets a very large annual stipend from the CIA, and is planning to create a Buddhist independent nation across the Himalayas, stretching from Ladakh in Kashmir to Arunachal Pradesh in Northeastern India. [Check Google map]

The war on Afghanistan and Pakistan by the U.S. is a drug war. The locals want to do away with drugs, but the Jews and U.S. want to keep profiting from this moneymaking scheme, because for centuries this particular secret industry has literally ruled the world with its profits.

The creation of a New Israel right in the middle of the major East Asian markets sheds new light on the American military assaults on Pakistan and Afghanistan, as its war against the Muslims of the region more and more resembles the Jewish-dominated political cooptation and military oppression in the Middle East.

Millions of penniless Indian and Bangledeshi peasants have for centuries provided slave labor to the British overlords who have always ruled Burma with puppets and who have plagued China and India with their opium. China in particular has every right to bear seriously ill will against the Jewish Sassoons of the world who control people’s minds through exploitation of their weaknesses.

This is the basis for all the wealth — the most “respectable” American and British families — that has been stolen and deposited in the bloody coffers of the Western corporate mindlock.

And the liberty-seeking peoples of the world suffer mightily from this “business” arrangement.

This is the most amazing story since Rabbi Moses Hess, Benjamin Disraeli and Lionel Rothschild wrote the Communist Manifesto and caused the American Civil War.

And the Jewish “outreach” never ceases.

Mizoram, Manipur and Nagaland. These are the three states that border Myanmar where sinister Jewish manipulation of desperate societies has become obvious.

The Milli Gazette Online reported:

The long-speculated view expressed by many observers that the United States seeks a foothold in the region seems to be vindicated when the US rushed, uninvited, to “help” Assam government soon after the Nagaland-Assam blasts. In its urgency, the US directly approached Assam chief minister bypassing New Delhi. The North-East, surrounded by many foreign countries including China and Bangladesh, appears, in a degree, to fit in a certain geopolitical strategy of Uncle Sam. The presence of religion-driven Christian militant groups seems to have created an atmosphere where an alliance of convenience may be forged between the interested parties. With a Church-backed “pre-empting” President at the helm in the US, the process of either making “revelational” biddings in the region or getting directly involved on some pretext seems to be on the cards. Many people suspect a complicit understanding between Christian missionaries (majority of them are from the US, and most of them are not innocent propagators of Christianity but linked to the worldview of Bush as shown by Vijay Prasad (“Eastward, evangelical soldiers!” Frontline, 12-25 February 2005) and the on-going drive to identify many tribes in Mizoram and Manipur as “Jews” (which has been earlier reported in the MG). This has far-reaching consequences.

And this:

Now the Aizawl-based Chhinlung Israel Peoples’ Convention, with a 0.25 million strength complete with a flag, is hoping to establish a “New Jerusalem” in the North-East. Streams of Jewish rabbis are coming to Mizoram and Manipur to refine the “Jews” to be ultimately fit to be an “integrated” member of the World Jewry. The Convention’s chairman, conforming to the present global trend of “fulfilling” Biblical prophecies, says, “The Torah (Old Testament) states that there shall be one holy land in the west and one in the east” (The Week, 12 Sep. 2004) . And this “New Jerusalem” has come up in the North East at the expense of the other peoples of the region.

This remote region of India north and east of Bangladesh is shrouded by the awful memory of what has come to be known as the Nellie Massacre, when in 1983 1500 Muslims were hacked to death after being promised it was safe to vote by Indian President Indira Gandhi. Numerous government inquiries produced no perpetrators and no motives, so typical in a government investigation when that government is controlled by Jews. Relations between India and Israel have warmed considerably in recent years.

The Nellie slaughter looked like a manipulated false flag massacre because Muslims and the indigenous Tiwas are not enemies. And it resembles the 9/11 coverup in the United States, where a major false flag operation was also blamed on Muslims.

The same result more recently occurred in Bombay, after 60 Uzi toting commandos shot up the Jewish Shabad House. On Nov. 26, 2008, a handful of terrorists, well trained and well armed, entered some high profile buildings and hotels, after killing three top anti-terrorist police officers and spraying bullets on common citizens in Mumbai. Latest information: 125 dead, around 300 injured some critically. Why was Shabad House never investigated? Muslims were rounded up, but the Jews, the ones who pulled the caper, were given a free pass, reminiscent of U.S Homeland Security czar Rabbi Michael Chertoff releasing 60 Israeli terror suspects immediately after the 9/11 incident.

Professor Michel Chossudovsky of globalresearch.ca stresses that the series of terrorist attacks across India seeks to create (a) social division between Muslims and Hindus within India, (b) tension between India and Pakistan, (c) conditions for US military operations inside Pakistan (which has been going on) and to expand the intervention in South and East Asia.

In regard to the Jewish outreach in easternmost India, The Deccan Chronicle also reported that Mr L. Thanggur, a church leader in Churachandpur, describes these conversions to Judaism to be only because of economic reasons.

“They are economic refugees. If they had better employment and income prospects here, they would have never dreamt of going to Israel,” said Mr Thanggur. In Israel too, some groups have attacked recognition of the Indian tribe by the chief rabbi. Social scientist Lev Grinberg said that Right-wing Jewish groups were promoting conversion of distant people simply to boost the Jewish population in occupied territories claimed by the Palestinians.

“The conversion ceremony is funded by the Israeli government through Shavei Israel, an organisation that has been trying to locate the 10 lost tribes of Israel,” Mr Fanai said.

Meanwhile, arrayed against this stealthy Jewish invasion are the Bharatas, who seek a return to pre-British India as a model of civilization for all the world to finally comprehend.

Bharatavarsha literally means the continent (‘varsha’, Sanskrit) that is dedicated (‘rata’) to light, wisdom (‘bha’). ”Our Vedic Rishis devoted themselves to the quest for the eternal truth and ultimate reality,” explains writer Sandya Jain in her essay ”Land of the Bharatas.”
www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=755

“The duty of the Cakravartin is total conquest of all the directions (digvijaya) by means of superior moral and political powers, to unite the country under a single moral kingdom and prevent anarchy. Readers will note that the Cakravartin is not merely an ideal ruler, but a powerful ancient political concept, inspired by a vision of the Hindu bhumi (national soul) as a unity which was not belied by the presence of multiple centres of political power. That is why civilisational values permeated the whole land and gave the tradition its abiding continuity.”

“This political renunciation of a kingdom won illegitimately is a unique Hindu ethic.”

This seems like a very appropriate response to Jewish plans to build New Jerusalem in Nagaland.

Not only that, but it also sounds like a good way to get rid of this centuries-old toxin called Jewish imperialism and build a country in which it’s safe to build a home without having armed guards to protect you because you’ve stolen the land from someone else.

• • •

The New World Order: Pax Judaica

Richard Edmondson:

” If, as Keiser maintains, Wall Street bankers—the “financial terrorists” as he calls them—are deliberately creating financial havoc on a global scale, and thereby destabilizing whole countries, we have to ask ourselves: is the sole motive personal financial enrichment or are there other objectives? If other objectives are in play, could one of them be “softening up” the European and North American populations in an effort to make them more receptive to coming changes? After all, if the Gentile countries prove incapable of self-governance, many of the people in these countries will not only be more receptive to a Jewish-Hasidic world order that promises stability and a semblance of prosperity, some will actually beg for it.
Yes, affable, apparently pleasant human beings are what we see in the Chabad video. But we have to remember, these are people brought up on the holocaust narrative. From early childhood it is drummed into them, quite literally as a religious credo. Six million…six million…six million. They were very nearly wiped out, says the narrative. And hostile Gentiles the world over, in growing numbers, are simply waiting for the right moment, the right hour, to strike again, to usher in and initiate the latest chapter in a history of persecution stretching back thousands of years, a long segmented chain of victimizations perpetrated by irrational anti-Semites who spread blood libels about them and never seem to tire of repeating history. This is the narrative. And while it is believed to varying degrees, for some it becomes a central part of their self-identity. Am I overstating things? Perhaps. But if I’m not, we must inquire to what lengths such people, such self-identified victims, would go to thwart the presumed machinations of the anti-Semite masses, and would this include the carrying out of a false flag attack?—which could of course be construed as another blood libel, but at some point the narrative and reality, the real and the unreal, the imagination and the substantive, begin to fuse and merge with one another.

If the above-mentioned “softening up” is indeed one of the objectives, then a key function, either consciously or unconsciously, of the various AIPAC-type lobbies situated in Western countries would be ensuring that the most honest and qualified—in essence the most competent—people are excluded from holding public office of any kind. Such individuals would represent a serious threat to the game plan of deliberate destabilization. The “He doesn’t stand a chance of getting elected” refrain then becomes an important psychological underpinning for the new Jewish world order, and with each disappointing election cycle, the refrain becomes more ingrained in public consciousness, reinforced by a rapidly growing recognition that money is the Achilles heel of democracy.

Conveniently, Chabad is there, not only with a solution to these many ills—Jewish control of the world—but even a religion—Noahidism—for the Gentiles to follow and thereby reap the blessings of God as servants of the Jews. The message is: surrender your national sovereignty to the bankers and peace will come. Thus the history of the world progresses…from Pax Romana, to Pax Americana, to Pax Judaica. It is an advancing juggernaut of sorts, and I’m not sure conventional protests such as we’ve seen them in the past, or even rioting such as recently occurred in Britain, are capable of stopping it. What does have the power to derail it, in my view, is an awakening to a strong spiritual faith—though one far different, of course, from Talmudic Judaism or its bastardized “noahide” offspring.

Call me mad if you like; regard me as a lunatic religious fanatic if that’s what pleases you, but the only thing that can halt the juggernaut in my view is a powerful spiritual force among the people, one that would function not instead of, but in addition to, the aforementioned protests, and which would become a key and necessary component of them; a force that is both near and far, within and without, dwelling in every heart, and beyond darkness. Such a force exists. It is called God. It is a God who is infinitely merciful and loving. A God who invites the poor, the crippled, and the blind—or the “blemished” as they were regarded by the Judaic Pharisees—and who responds like a lover, who fills our seven spiritual centers, or “chakras”, when we offer ourselves. It is a God who lives inside us, and who rejoices when, in the words of Paul, we no longer “conform to the pattern of the world.”

My Comment:

The Pax Americana is really a Pax Anglo-Americana or Pax Brittanica.  In the sense that it is financed by the bankers (City of London), it is Judaic, though its Judaic nature is concealed by language.

It  would be more accurate, thus, to say that the Pax Romana was succeeded by the Christian empires –  the Holy Roman Empire in Western Europe, and, in the Near East, The Byzantine Empire. These were then challenged from within by the nation-states, and, from without, by the Mohammedan caliphates that rose in succession after the founding of Islam.

The merchant elites of these nation-states, the bankers, were largely Jewish, so that the Jews by default are identified with the rise and development of the modern state system, although their power was hidden behind the political figures on the stage.

The British empire was in this sense much less British than it was Jewish.

So, evidently, what has supplanted the Mohammedans for the last five hundred years (they are still fighting a rear-guard action) has been an Anglo-Dutch-Jewish hegemony, which, while it has increasingly become overtly Judaicized, was always so covertly.

In brief, since the Enlightenment, we have already been living under the Pax Judaica and the Hebraicization of religion and culture, from Maimonides to Spinoza to Marx  to Reich.

Modernity, as it is today, is no more than secular Semitism, in the words of Joe Sobran.

Note: These are incomplete thoughts. I don’t object in toto to this Hebraicization and see it as coterminous in many ways with “rationalization”, but it is a distinctively Judaic rationalization, owing certain features of even its most secular operations to Cabbala.

To a student of the occult, this cabbalistic underbelly of Western thought (the “wisdom tradition”) can be profoundly enriching, but when it is misconstrued in materialistic terms, it is also the very force working to destroy even the best elements of traditional religion.

Herein lies the problem…

Christian Zionists Worship Jews, Not Jesus

Left-WingChristian writes:

“Were Perry a true follower of Jesus, he might well have quoted Christ’s beatitude, “Blessed are the peacemakers,” and issued a call for the wars to end; or perhaps he might have recited the parable of the Good Samaritan as an illustration of why programs to help the needy—programs almost totally gutted in recent years—now, more than ever, need urgently to be restored; or he could have reminded his listeners of Jesus’ uncompromising denunciation of the political leaders of his day—“Woe to you teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!”—and called upon all Christians to follow that preeminent example of standing up and speaking truth to power.

The fact that Perry did none of these things should not surprise us, however. Ten days ago I argued that in the Christian Zionist religion, Jews quite literally replace Jesus as an object of veneration and adoration, and that in reality Christian Zionists worship not Jesus—but Jews. Here in part is what I wrote:

In Christian Zionism, Christ is reduced to a minor, almost inconsequential figure. CZs are quick to point out that Jesus was Jewish, and that’s certainly a point in his favor where they are concerned, but the vast majority of his teachings are discarded. For CZs, the real object of worship is the Jewish people in a collective sense. Let me repeat that: CZs do not worship Christ; they worship Jews.

Extremely steeped in the Old Testament, the theology of Christian Zionism is driven by the belief that Jews are God’s “chosen people”, that they are therefore superior, and that it is the obligation of Gentiles to “bless” them (read: “serve” them) as is commanded in Genesis 12:3. Any concerns about Jesus come secondary to this. CZs view the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 as nothing short of a miracle of God, and this is a belief they are likely to retain no matter how many mass murders, genocides, war crimes, and crimes against humanity Israel commits. In fact, the more Israel does these things, the more CZs are likely to approve of it, for the Jews of the Old Testament carried out very similar acts.
A depoliticized god who favors Jews and has no qualms about war—it sounds pretty much like the sort of religion Zionists would prescribe for Gentiles. And indeed, as I went on to note, this is what Noahidism is all about. Heavily promoted by the Chabad Lubavitch movement, Noahidism in a nutshell is Christian Zionism with Jesus formally, finally, and irrevocably stripped away.

Rajiv Malhotra On How The US’s Civilizational Psychosis Threatens India

Rajiv Malhotra, author of “Breaking India,” writes:

Challenged America hedging its bets on India

So how does this play into India? With the Chinese threat on one side and the Islamic threat on other side the challenged America has developed a schizophrenic attitude towards India which is what I will explain to you. So United States is hedging its bets on India. That is why it is impossible to characterize America one way or the other with respect to India on a long time basis.

I am going to go through the left hand side of the slide first which is the move to build up India and the right hand side of the slide says Fragment India – thus two opposing views on India. The build up India voices in American think tanks and American policy and so on are saying let us invest in India financial capital, market and labor; let us have military alliances let us have regional political alliances. And the benefit is that it will counter China’s hegemony, it contains Islamic threat; it is good for US corporate interests and India will be a stabilizing force in the third world. But there is also a caution at the bottom that says that if this happens and India is too successful then in the long term we have another China like threat. One China is bad enough what if another brilliant people became another kind of China and as successful in competing United States and then we will have to worry about two kinds of Chinas. So while there is a voice that says let us build up India there is also a voice that is concerned that it may get out of hand and become too strong. Therefore let us come to the right hand side that says let us fragment India.

The “Fragment India” is a much older voice than the “Build up India” voice. The “Build up” India is more of a corporate voice and political voice over the last ten years. But the fragmentation of India is a voice that has been there since the cold war. In the fifties and sixties United States has had this attitude that .let us divide and rule. They built up this Dravidian movement; Annadurai was built up and all kinds of movements were built up to fragment India and play one against the other. When Nehru was pro-Soviet then the United States used the Dravidian movement to counteract Nehru’s programme of unifying India. So the fragmentation of India is a very old policy. And it says exploit Dalits vs. the Brahmins; Dravidians vs. so-called Aryans; Women vs. Men Minorities vs. Hindus.

And the benefits to the proponents of this voice are that United States Avoids China like competition; You can still outsource and use those laborers; you can get a whole lot of cheap laborers in India but they will never get out of hand; they will never be too strong and they will never rebel against you. You can still use them on your terms and you can keep them weak. It will also accelerate evangelism because when the state is weak then the evangelists can have clear paths and there will be less resistance to what they are trying to do. and what a great market for weapons exporters. Imagine if the army of Gujarat wants to buy tanks and the army of Maharashtra wants to buy anti-tank missiles, what a great thing for the arms merchants! Their stocks will go up if there is a disruption in India. If the disruptive forces of Hegde would become civil war that would be good news for weapons exporters.

Now the United States is also very concerned if this fragmentation of India happens. It is good to talk about it but if it actually materializes then it is worst nightmare for United States to have anarchy or chaos in India. with India many times the size of Iraq or Afghanistan or Pakistan it would be the worst nightmare for United States if there is fragmentation of India.

US Interventions in India

So I call this the Mother-in-law syndrome. Do I want the couple to be united and happy or do I want them to fall apart? If they are too united, they will not listen to me. I don’t have a voice. I do not have the power. So I have to go and meddle around and play one against the other and create some friction. But then if that gets to the point they would divorce and go apart , then again I am in trouble. So I kind of play between these two poles and do not want either pole to happen too much. So United States’ policy towards India keeps vacillating between these two poles of “Build up India” and “Fragment India” And you cannot expect a long term stability in the way.

I have also been studying for the past decade various US interventions in India. And this is a very significant chart. At the top is the United States – Academy, Government, Church, Funding agencies – how they work together and fund the money with US ideology in training, leadership training, all kinds of things to be done in India and India receives that through the academy, funding agencies, church subsidiaries, NGOs and so on. This is a kind of asymmetry because India does not do this up in the other direction.

Deconstructing India

And the way India is deconstructed, is shown here. This is how the “Fragment India” tank of the US looks at India: they look through both the secular lenses shown in the left and the Biblical lenses in the right and in between are the problems they study.

So the first building blocks to study are the castes, minorities and women. They keep showing that they have problems; they are oppressed and the civilization is bad. This feeds into a negative approach to Hinduism. And the negative approach to Hinduism feeds a negative approach to Indian civilization. Finally at the top there is a group of scholars who look at why India is not a valid nation-state; what is wrong with it and what are the human rights problems and other kinds of problems. So this is the kind of deconstruction of India template, if you will, which is quite commonly found in South Asian studies. By the way I have looked at the last thirty two years of conferences on South Asia which is held at Madison every year. I got all the proceedings and abstracts. They were surprised that somebody wanted to buy all of them. It portrays India as an anti-progressive country, frozen in time, poverty-causing like a patient with caste, Sati, dowry, feticide, untouchability etc with West as the doctor. Further India is mystical and the West is rational. Whenever I hear this very common statement in United States, I say “Look. The chances are that your doctor is Indian. He is not irrational or with some mystical background. And the chances are that the lot of technology you are using is Indian and it is not created by a bunch of mystical people but by pretty rational people. So why do you keep thinking that way? It is just one of the old stereotypes that have not gone away.”

Invasion Theory of India

Then there is this idea that everything good about India was imported into India. The so-called Aryans brought Sanskrit. The Greeks brought philosophy and rational thought; Hinduism was a colonial construction; Indian culture was started by the Mughals and British gave Indians a nation and cricket and now we have to import our human rights from America. So everything we need we should import. And I call this the invasion theory of India which means if we want something we should select who is the best invader who will give that to us. So we do not have any selfhood or we do not have any civilization we need to be invaded to have something of value. And this means that we are doomed to dependency also.

Afro-Dalit Project

Now what caught me started on this course of understanding America’s intervention with India’s break up was a very interesting meeting I had with a scholar in Princeton University. We were just sitting and having lunch and he has just come back from India and I said “What did you do in India?” And he said “Oh I went there as part of the Afro-Dalit project” So I asked him what is this Afro Dalit project. So he said, “Oh we go to India we do youth empowerment and training programmes” I said “It is very interesting. Can you tell me what it is? Who are the Dalits?” And he said “Well. … They are Africans. They are the blacks of India and the non-Dalits are the whites of India. And this is the black-white history of India which is mirroring the black white history of America. And the Afro-Dalit project is to educate our Dalit brothers.” This was amazing to me. And my whole thesis started when I started searching on Afro-Dalit project.

And there is a whole library of what they are up to and who funds them. And they are very much active in Tamil Nadu building up a whole network of youth empowerment and youth training to give them a contrary sense of history that they are historically a kind of oppressed people and non-religious and so on. The Church has a vested interest in it because if you can dislocate their identity from the rest of India then you can re-programme them and give them a new religion and so on. This is called Dalitstan project. So I was invited to this scholar’s office. And I saw this map. This is the map of the Dalitstan that was hanging there. On the northern part is Mughalstan which is from Afghanistan, Pakistan and all the way to Bangladesh. This turns out to be what Mullah Omar says when he states that he wants to put the flag of Taliban on the red fort of Delhi and recreate the Mughal Empire. And the southern part of India is Dalitstan and Dravidstan. So these guys are working on it. So I was very much amazed that nobody is talking about it. Nobody seems to have noticed. Yet these guys have an open project. If you just Google Afro-Dalit you will come across a lot of hits and you yourself can see that. Then I started getting deeper into it and found that there is merit in the thesis that says that the local minorities are being appropriated by global nexuses. Afro-Dalit Project is just one example.

“Disruptive Forces” – Frontier India

So Hegde’s “Disruptive forces” of 1992 have turned into Frontier India mindset where the following wild things are happening. Local minority is co-opted as a branch office of some Global Nexus; many minorities are apart of some global majority and are used for trans-national agendas; third world intellectual franchises are set up to deconstruct their own nation.

It is very interesting that America’s very own sense of nation is becoming stronger and stronger and also the nation of China, the nation of Russia and the nation of Japan are becoming stronger and they are not deconstructing. They are not going out of style. And the European Union is becoming a strong super nation. But somehow the intellectual fashion of the day that is being exported to Indian intellectuals and third world intellectuals is that please go back to your country and deconstruct yourselves. We have to ask them to first do that to themselves. Now you may say that there is a lot of post-modernism in American campuses and they are doing it to them also. But they are doing it from the fringes. The people who are doing it do not have clout. Nobody takes them seriously. The media does not quote these kind of people. They are not policy makers. They do not influence think-tanks. They just are cocoon in the academy and doing some deconstruction of America but the powers to be are very patriotic and the nation state is as strong as ever.

Minorities as part of Global Majorities

So this also led me to question the definition of minority. And I want to leave this provocation with you.

If you are at the Macdonald’s in Delhi and you have local establishment with twenty employees you would not say that this is a minority institution. You would say that it is part of global empire. It is part of a huge global multi-national. Some one may say that all these twenties are from minority classes in India. You will still not be convinced because as individuals working there may be minorities in their personal capacity. But the institution they are working for is a branch office of a large multinational and not a minority. Now why don’t you not apply the same thing to the Southern Baptist Church or Baptist Church which is a huge multinational which has set up a big network of churches in Nagaland and Tamil Nadu and they have a plan of twenty thousand churches in South India. So why do you call them minorities and not call them branch offices or subsidiaries of global multinationals? Why is it that if the product being sold is God’s love then all of a sudden the rules of the multinational do not apply? Because it is God’s love, God’s love is exempt from scrutiny and transparency.

I would submit to you that the definition of minority has to be modulated and if a minority is working for or funded by appointed by trained by a foreign global nexus, then it is not really a minority. It is part of a bigger enterprise. And that enterprise should be studied rather than these isolated twenty thirty people in a place whom we call minority. So I even provoke you to rethink the definition of minority itself in this age of globalization.

Positive India narrative

Now there is a new positive India narrative in the US Business schools. this is the response we like to hear. Finally India’s time has come because I have lived there for last thirty eight years and only in the last seven years this voice has started. Otherwise there is always there is only the kind of discourse that I have stated earlier. Now there is positive focus on investment, markets, labor force and all that. So what we have are two competing discourses. There is a positive discourse which says “Build up India” and this is primarily in business schools. So when my friends want to donate something for the study of India or South Asia, I always tell them to give it to the business schools and not to South Asian studies because South Asian studies are built on fragmentation of India -“Why India is a problem” kind of thesis built upon the old humanities or social sciences.

And now the irony is that both these views are also encased in India. In India also you have the technocrats, industrialists those kind of people who believe in a positive sense of India. Then you also have people in social sciences (and a lot of social science views are actually imported) in India who do not have faith in India as a nation. So you have both voices within India also.

Hypothetical situation for US intervention in India

Now I come to a more troubling part of my thesis.

I am going to give you hypothetical scenario for US intervention in India. Suppose South Asia becomes the epicenter of USA vs. Islam which can happen. Suppose the Taliban takes over nuclearized Pakistan. Ten years ago I wrote a paper on such a scenario but did not publish it because I thought it was sensational but today it is a possibility. What can happen is Taliban takes over ISI and ISI takes over the Pakistan army indirectly and we all know that Pakistan army runs Pakistan. So Pakistan could have a democratically elected government which can act as a nice front for PRO purposes but really they do not have the power and they do not call the shots. It is even worse than having Musharaff. Because at least there it was transparent as you were dealing with an army. But here Pakistan can fool one to think that they are dealing with some group of importance while really that group does not have any power. Let us say under such scenario Taliban takes over Pakistan and thus is now nuclearized Taliban. Now let us say US is fighting and years go on and the causalities build up and US faces economic pressures at home and another election is coming. So this fight turns into Obama’s Iraq. This fight with Talibanized nuclear Pakistan becomes Obama’s liability and US is desperate to exit but exit with honor.

< p>So Obama or the future president has to figure out a way for exiting. So when the US exits, after having flared it up, then it has become a mess that somebody is going to encounter and guess who is going to bear that brunt of it? that will be India. I will also surmise in this hypothesis that Taliban will then have their vision of setting up that Mughalstan. They will see that they have enough disruptive forces sitting in India which can be incited by them and then they can get going with a huge revolution. Now that US has gone they can take over. Number Two. United States may also have another kind of intervention in India which is to safeguard Christians being persecuted. Some of you may think this is far fetched.

But when I started to research on this I saw a Wall street journal front page article two or three years ago titled US evangelists driving foreign policy intervention. It is a very long article that showed a hundred years history of evangelicals not only driving domestic policies like abortion and gay and nowadays on stem cell research very successfully but also very strong on foreign policy. And all foreign policy they want is that the United States should intervene wherever there is a pocket of Christians who consider themselves to be under threat. Once the United States agrees that that is the policy then they go and create some trouble and use that to bring United States intervention in there. Now the dossier of such cases of persecution of Christians in India is growing and it is a huge dossier in United States and there are regular hearings in Washington for which they invite those Indians who complain and there is a long line of such people who are granted Visa and travels grants to go and give testimony in the US congress. Also there are well organized networks in India which have been funded by these entities to provoke trouble, to monitor persecution and then go over to report and lobby in Washington. This is all over the US media. So United States may decide “Ok Taliban has got North India. We can go and intervene here and there and get some Christianized pockets in South India. We have built our own base there and we have built a network of support.” So this is the worst case scenario.

Now similar analysis also applies to Islam and China intervening, as each of them has stakes in India and ambitions in India. One can do scenarios like what if China and Pakistan jointly take military action. China would love to have Arunachal Pradesh because of the water -the Brahmaputra river water which can then be taken to Tibet. China would love to take Nepal because most of the water that comes to Ganga comes from Nepal and filters down to India. So this fight over water makes this geography very strategic and China would love to have all these. So you could build four scenarios of type A which shows how globalization brings civilizational threats to India.

What India can contribute to the world?

Now I shall go to part- II. Now I want you to set aside the disturbing scenario I have explained. Now let us see what is positive that India can offer to the world -how India could be a successful civilization and do positive things.

So to start with what are the problems the world faces where India can offer a solution? I will list just three. One is that development- the cycle of economic development is not sustainable or scalable. It is not ecologically possible to have development of such large number of people and achieve the per capita consumption of the western standard and also you cannot scale to the whole world. Then the Abrahamic civilizations are based on exclusivity and a mandate to take over the world and that is not going to sustain peaceful environment. Finally the human rights laws that exist protect the individual but not cultures. There is no law broken if the language is made extinct or if your culture or your rituals are gone. If you as an individual are not violated then the culture as an entity does not have a status. Only the individual has a status. So I will not go through this in detail because that will be a whole presentation by itself on what are some of the contributions that Indian civilization can make. There is a large reservoir of know-how of consciousness development, enhancement – what is called mind-sciences, intuition, creativity which is now at the cutting edge of western research in cognitive sciences, neuro-sciences, psychology and this is an asset that India has which is actually being acknowledged by the scientific community. So India brings a lot in this dimension.

There is a whole worked out system in Indian society on ecological sustainability starting with being content with less consumerism. The whole Ashrama model where you divide life into four stages has you as a consumerist in the second stage as householder (Gruhasth). But in the stages before and after that you learn life to be happy without much consumerism. These are social models which may be of application to world order where you cannot expect every body to live hundred years old and be a consumerist from zero to hundred at the American level.

Then there is the concept of groups that are de-centralized and self-organized without a state or a very centralized government or authoritarian government running the show. This is a very old Indian social organization that is highly de-centralized and the groups do not need some one else to give them laws and commandments as they are very well self-organized. There is the banyan tree metaphor which is sometimes used to describe this kind of society that is not one trunk or one system but lots of it together. And all of this results in pluralism, dignified aging and decentralized social security. In India we have dignified aging because you do not end up in old age home. But today because of modernity you do. Old age homes have been started here because of the tendency to westernize. But the tradition has a dignified aging. And there is kind of social security from one’s own community. Jaathi was social security network. But now we break families now and we break Jaathi structure and make it into caste. Now who is going to give you old age security? State does not have the money. Even in United States, the social security is going broke. So I do not think any country like India can provide such social security. So these are some ideas regarding Indian civilizational contribution.

False Dissent: Gatekeepers From Ron Paul To Noam Chomsky

Zahir Ebrahim:

“Virtually one hundred percent of what is deemed respectable Western dissent espouses this foundational axiom. It works well because it draws upon selective empiricism couched in omissions to demonstrate its veracity. But a half-truth is still only a full lie. That full lie works like this:

‘The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects, by lowering what Mr. Churchill calls an “iron curtain” between the masses and such facts or arguments as the local political bosses regard as undesirable, totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could have done by the most eloquent denunciations, the most compelling of logical rebuttals. But silence is not enough. If persecution, liquidation and the other symptoms of social friction are to be avoided, the positive sides of propaganda must be made as effective as the negative.’

— Aldous Huxley, Preface (circa 1946) to Brave New World, 1931, Harper, pg. 11

Both sides of propaganda are thus put into effect. The mainstream chiefs enact the big lie and repeat it endlessly for the positive side of propaganda. The dissent-chief enact the negative side of propaganda by calculated omission of certain subjects, and by omitting to draw logical conclusions from them because they no longer have to — the facts have been omitted from the “respectable” discourse space altogether. It is wonderful how this is used to provide the illusion of the free press and free society by both the mainstream press and the so called alternate press:

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum – even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.”

— Noam Chomsky

This is exactly the same controlled-dissent genre of lauded pontiffs of dissentstream spanning the gamut from Messrs. Ron Paul ( http://tinyurl.com/RonPaul-NWO-Asset ) to Noam Chomsky himself ( http://tinyurl.com/Hegelian-Dialectic-Dissent ) et. al. on the Left-Liberal-Libertarian nexus, to Foxnews-Right-wing-Religion-Intelligence-State-worship-Patriotism nexus.

I am not sure which compartment Francis Boyle ( http://tinyurl.com/francisboyle-2011-humanity ) falls into but it is just as systemic there as elsewhere.

I invite Truthdig to publish the examination referenced below written by a Muslim, yours truly, belonging to the ‘untermensch’ civilization bearing the full brunt of Chris Hedges’ admission that “We became terrorists too,” and “We Are What We Loathe”.

Such banal statements can perhaps win Mr. Hedges multiple Pulitzer prizes for their profundity — precisely because these neither inform nor educate to the degree necessary for unraveling the entire Hegelian Dialectic, lest it spawn a real resistance movement with teeth singularly focused on the puppetmasters orchestrating the “clash of civilizations”.

This style of dissent-lite only enables introducing and sustaining beneficial cognitive diversity for the purpose of defocusing the energies of conscionable peoples – its primary objective – until fait accompli.”