Europe Thumbs Its Nose At G-Sax, Banksters

March 9, 2010 // No Comments »

The Guardian:

“For the first time in five years, no big US investment bank appears among the top nine sovereign bond bookrunners in Europe, according to Dealogic data compiled for the Guardian. Only Morgan Stanley ranks at number 10.

Goldman Sachs doesn’t make the table. Goldman made it to number five last year and in 2006, and number eight in 2007, the data shows. JP Morgan was in the top ten last year and in 2007 and 2006 but doesn’t appear this year.

“Governments do not have the confidence that the excessive risk-taking culture of the big Wall Street banks has changed and they still cannot be trusted to put the stability of the financial system before profit,” said Arlene McCarthy, vice chair of the European parliament’s economic and monetary affairs committee. “It is no surprise therefore that governments are reluctant to do business with banks that have failed to learn the lesson of the crisis. The banks need to acknowledge the mistakes that were made and behave in an ethical way to regain the trust and confidence of governments.”

Posted in Finance, Kleptocracy

Soros, Paulson etc. Under DOJ Probe For Destabilizing Euro

March 3, 2010 // No Comments »

“The U.S. Justice Department has launched an investigation into whether heavyweight hedge funds including Soros Fund Management, SAC, Greenlight Capital and Paulson & Co.  aggressively shorted the euro in recent weeks to destabilise it, the WSJ reported on Wednesday, citing people familiar with the matter.

According to the paper,  the department has asked hedge funds to retain trading records and electronic communications relating to the EU currency which needless to say has come under strong selling pressure as a result of the Greek debt crisis. The euro has lost more than 10% since November. It currently trades at $1.3609….”

More at the Wall Street Journal.

I blogged a few days ago about David Einhorn’s holdings, noting his anti-Euro trade; I also noted that without the raids against Allied and Lehman and without his late-in-the day piling onto gold, Einhorn’s record really isn’t as impressive as all the hype about his abilities would lead you to believe.

Posted in Kleptocracy

Ron Paul On Fed Coverup Of Watergate, Saddam Funding

February 27, 2010 // 2 Comments »

Statement of Congressman Ron Paul
United States House of Representatives
Statement for the Record
February 25, 2010

Madame Speaker, I would like to enter into the record the following letter from Professor Robert D. Auerbach, a professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas. This letter provides additional information regarding remarks I made at yesterday’s Financial Services Committee Humphrey-Hawkins hearing, remarks which Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke categorized as “bizarre.”

I thank Congressman Ron Paul for bringing to the public’s attention the Federal Reserve coverup of the source of the Watergate burglars’ source of funding and the defective audit by the Federal Reserve of the bank that transferred $5.5 billion from the U.S. government to Saddam Hussein in the 1980s. Congressman Paul directed these comments to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke at the House Financial Services Hearing February 24, 2010. I question Chairman Bernanke’s dismissive response.

BERNANKE: “Well, Congressman, these specific allegations you’ve made I think are absolutely bizarre, and I have absolutely no knowledge of anything remotely like what you just described.”

The evidence Congressman Ron Paul mentioned is well documented in my recent book, Deception and Abuse at the Fed (University of Texas Press: 2008). The head of the Federal Reserve bureaucracy should become familiar with its dismal practices.

First, consider the Fed’s coverup of the source of the $6300 in hundred dollar bills found on the Watergate burglars when they were arrested at approximately 2:30 A.M. on June 17, 1972 after they had broken into the Watergate offices of the Democratic Party. Five days after the break-in, June 22, 1972, at a board of directors’ meeting of officials at the Philadelphia Fed Bank, it was recorded in the minutes [shown on page 23 of my book] that false or misleading information had been provided to a reporter from the Washington Post about the $6,300. Bob Woodward told me he thought he was the Washington Post reporter who had made the phone inquiry. The reporter “had called to verify a rumor that these bills were stolen from this Bank” according to the Philadelphia Fed minutes. The Philadelphia Fed Bank had informed the Board on June 20 that the notes were “shipped from the Reserve Bank to Girard Trust Company in Philadelphia on April 3, 1972.” The Washington Post was incorrectly informed of “thefts but told they involved old bills that were ready for destruction.”

The Federal Reserve under the chairmanship of Author Burns not only kept the Fed from getting entangled in the Watergate coverup, which the Fed’s actions had assisted, it allowed false statements about bills the Fed knew were issued by the Philadelphia Fed Bank to stand uncorrected. Blocking information from the Senate and House Banking Committees [letters shown in my book, Chapter 2] and issuing false information during a perilous government crisis imposed huge costs on the public that had insufficient information to hold the Fed officials accountable for what they had withheld from the Congress. Had the deception been discovered the Fed chairmen following Burns may have been forced to rapidly implement some real transparency to restore the Fed’s credibility. That would have reduced or eliminated many of the lies, deceptions, and corrupt practices that are described in my book.

The second subject brought up by Congressman Ron Paul is the exposure of faulty examinations of the Federal Reserve of a foreign bank in Atlanta, Georgia through which $5.5 billion was sent to Saddam Hussein that a Federal Judge found to be part of United States active support for Iraq in the 1980s.
On November 9, 1993, several federal marshals brought a prisoner, Christopher Drogoul, into my office at the Rayburn House Office Building of the U.S. House of Representatives. The marshals removed the manacles. Drogoul took off his jump suit and changed into a shirt, tie, and business suit. He immediately looked like the manager of the Atlanta agency with domestic headquarters in New York City of Banca Nazionale. Drogoul had come to testify about a “scheme prosecutors said he masterminded that funneled $5.5 billion in loans to Iraq’s Hussein through BNL’s Atlanta operation. Some of the loans allegedly were used to build up Iraq’s military and nuclear arsenals in the years preceding the first Gulf War.”[1]

Drogoul’s “‘off book’ BNL-Atlanta funding to Iraq began in 1986 as financing for products under Department of Agriculture programs.”[2] The loans allegedly had been authorized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Since Drogoul told the committee he was merely a tool in an ambitious scheme by the United States, Italy, Britain and Germany to secretly arm Iraq in their 1980-88 war, the testimony was politically contentious and unproven. He was sentenced in November 1993 to 37 months in prison and he had already served 20 months awaiting his sentencing hearing.

U.S. District Judge Ernest Tidwell found that the United States had actively supported Iraq in the 1980s by providing it with government-guaranteed loans even though it wasn’t creditworthy. The judge said such policies “clearly facilitated criminal conduct.”[3]

Gonzalez was drawn to Drogoul’s answer about the Fed examiner who had visited his Atlanta operation. Gonzalez said that:

“At the November 9, 1993 Banking Committee hearing I asked Christopher Drogoul, the convicted official of the Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro agency branch in Atlanta, Georgia, how the Federal Reserve Bank examiners could miss billions of dollars of illegal loans, most of which ended up in the hands of Hussein.

Mr. Drogoul stated:

“The task of the Fed [bank examiner] was simply to confirm that the State of Georgia audit revealed no major problems. And thus, their audit of BNL usually consisted of a one or two-day review of the state of Georgia’s preliminary results, followed by a cup of espresso in the manager’s office.”

Gonzalez was appalled at the of lack of effective examination of a little storefront bank and also appalled by the gifts exchanged by officers of the New York Federal Reserve and the regulated banks in New York City where the main U.S. office of BNL was located. A description of what followed is in my book.

The Fed voted in 1995 to destroy the source transcripts of its policy making committee that had been sent to National Archives and Records Administration. Chairman Alan Greenspan had the committee vote on this destruction, telling the members: “I am not going to record these votes because we do not have to. There is no legal requirement.” (p. 104 in my book.) Greenspan thus removed any fingerprints on this act of record destruction. Donald Kohn, who is now Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors at the Federal Reserve, answered some questions I had sent to Chairman Greenspan about this destruction. Kohn replied in a letter on November 1, 2001 to me at the University of Texas that they had destroyed the source records for 1994, 1995 and 1996, they did not believe it to be illegal and there was no plan to end this practice. That is one reason why the Federal Reserve audit supported by Congressman Ron Paul is needed. The Fed must stop destroying its records.

[1] Marcy Gordon, “Banker Imprisoned in BNL Case Tells Story to House Committee,” The Associated Press, November 9, 1993.

[2] U.S. Newswire: “Former Executive of Atlanta Agency of Italian-Owned Bank Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy”, from U.S. Department of Justice, Public Affairs, June 2, 1992.

[3] Peter Mantius, “Drogoul given 37 months Judge in BNL case also blasts actions of U.S. prosecutors,” The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, December 10, 1993, Section A, p. 12.

Robert Auerbach is Professor of Public Affairs at the Lyndon Baines Johnson School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin. He was an economist with the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee during the tenure of four Federal Reserve Chairmen: Arthur Burns, William Miller, Paul Volcker, and Alan Greenspan. Auerbach also served as an economist in the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Domestic Monetary Affairs during the first year of the Ronald Reagan administration and as a financial economist with the U.S. Federal Reserve System. Auerbach has been a professor of economics at the American University in Washington, D.C. (1976-83), and a professor of economics and finance at the University of California-Riverside (1983-93). He has written numerous articles, and two textbooks in banking and financial markets. He received two Masters degrees in economics, one from the University of Chicago and one from Roosevelt University, where he studied under Abba Lerner, and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Chicago, where he studied under Milton Friedman.

Posted in Iraq War, Kleptocracy

Sibel Edmonds On Traitors In High Places

February 25, 2010 // 1 Comment »

“Sibel Edmonds: The Traitors Among Us,”

by Brad Friedman, Hustler Magazine, March 2010

“Edmonds’s most disturbing allegations, however, may be against high-ranking appointed officials in the Bush Administration. Elaborating on testimony she laid out in her sworn deposition, Edmonds told American Conservative magazine’s Phil Giraldi—a 17-year CIA counterterrorism officer—very specific details of alleged traitorous schemes perpetrated by top State and Defense Department officials. As already noted, these included Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz and, perhaps most notably, former Deputy Undersecretary of State Marc Grossman, the third-highest-ranking official in the Bush State Department.

Edmonds said that Feith and Wolfowitz were involved in plans to break Iraq into U.S. and British protectorates months prior to 9/11. She also claimed that the duo shared information with Grossman on how to blackmail various officials and that Grossman had accepted cash to help procure and sell nuclear weapons technology to Israel and Turkey—and, from there, on to the foreign black market. There the technology would be purchased by the highest bidder, such as Pakistan, Iran, Libya, North Korea or possibly even al-Qaeda.

Additionally, Edmonds claimed that Grossman, the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey before taking his State Department post, had tipped off Turkish diplomats to the true identity of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson’s front company, Brewster Jennings & Associates, a full three years prior to their being publicly outed by columnist Robert Novak. That in itself, according to George H.W. Bush, would be an act of treason carried out by “the most insidious of traitors.”

Former CIA counterterrorism officer Giraldi summed up Edmonds’s disclosures to me in blunt terms: “This was a massive coordinated espionage effort directed against United States nuclear secrets engineered by foreign agents who successfully corrupted senior government officials and legislators in our Congress. It’s that simple.”

According to a declassified version of a 2005 Department of Justice Inspector General’s report, Sibel Edmonds’s allegations are “credible,” “serious” and “warrant a thorough and careful review by the FBI.”
Perhaps more damningly, the FBI’s John Cole recently confirmed a key element of Edmonds’s claims when he revealed the existence of “the FBI’s decade-long investigation” of the State Department’s Grossman. Edmonds claimed that Grossman was perhaps the top U.S. ringleader for the entire foreign espionage scheme. The probe, Cole added, “ultimately was buried and covered up.”

More at Antiwar by Philip Giraldi, on Edmond’s credibility.

Here is an op-ed written by Sibel Edmonds about the role of foreign agents in “hijacking” the country.

I should note that Edmonds herself has been seen by some as playing a sophisticated role of disinformation by overemphasizing Arab involvement in 9-11.

Frankly, I don’t know enough about her to argue if that’s plausible or not. In any case, even if her revelations serve an ulterior purpose, they are bad enough as they stand….

Posted in Kleptocracy, Peak Performance

Financiers Used 9-11 Diversion of FBI to Loot American Middle-Class

February 1, 2010 // 1 Comment »

Great interview at Forbes, between Steve Forbes and Senator Ted Kaufman on the capital markets, naked short selling, the uptick rule, sponsored access, HFT (high frequency trading) and digitalization, dark pools, and fraud…

“Forbes: Finally, Fraud Enforcement Recovery Act.
Kaufman: Yeah, yeah.
Forbes: You’re proud of it.

Kaufman: Yeah, I am.

Forbes: What it does, and what will it do?

Kaufman: OK, here’s what it did. After 9/11, we moved a lot of FBI agents over to cover terrorism, which we should have done. But we left only like 250 FBI agents in the country to cover financial fraud. We did more financial fraud cases in 2001 than we did in 2007, can you believe that? So, what we did with this financial and regulatory forum, with Pat Leahy, who is chairman of judiciary committee and Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican. It’s a bipartisan bill and we got a bill passed to give us more FBI agents, give us more prosecutors and to go after these folks. And so that’s basic what we passed, and we’re getting organized. Had a really good hearing of the judiciary committee. Rob Khuzami at the Securities Exchange Commission, Lanny Breuer’s head of the criminal division, Kevin [Perkins] from the FBI financial thing.

And we’re really, we’re going after this thing. And I know you agree with me. You know, if you, the folks that committed crimes while this thing was going on, we can all argue about what caused it or not, anybody who took advantage of this situation and lined their own pocket for it should go jail.”

Posted in Kleptocracy

Did Bethany McLean Even Break The Enron Story?

January 28, 2010 // 2 Comments »

n “Enronathon,” Seth Mnookin of The Wall Street Journal suggests Bethany McLean wasn’t quite the first person to break the story of Enron…and that she had a good bit of unacknowledged help:

“If journalism were in the Olympics, the Enron story might well be pairs figure skating. Bethany McLean, the young Fortune writer who first wrote about Enron’s shady finances a year ago, has, of course, already been awarded the gold.

And with that have come the requisite endorsements: In the past two months, she was hired as a consultant by NBC News and shared in a $1.4 million deal to co-author a book on the scandal. But another team is also vying for top honors — amid complaints about shoddy judging.

Reporters and editors at the Wall Street Journal believe their work has been unjustly ignored, with some wondering whether Pulitzer rivals like the Washington Post and the New York Times have gone out of their way to praise McLean.

Enron did not collapse under its own weight,” says Jonathan Friedland, the Journal editor who’s been in charge of much of the paper’s Enron coverage. “Without our reporting, I don’t think any of this would have happened.”

In response, McLean’s former editor at Fortune and current Time Inc. editorial director John Huey says, “Bethany was the first journalist in a widely respected national publication to suggest that the emperor at Enron had no clothes.” (Not that her own publication took much note: Fortune had to airbrush out Kenneth Lay from a November SMARTEST PEOPLE WE KNOW cover photo.) Let’s recap: In September 2000, Jonathan Weil wrote a long story for the now-defunct Texas edition of the Journal about odd accounting at various Texas-based energy traders; it included four paragraphs on Enron.

James Chanos, a well-known short-seller who was one of the first to start unloading Enron stock, says he got interested in the company after reading Weil’s piece.

Almost six months later, in March 2001, the then 30-year-old McLean (who Times columnist Maureen Dowd has suggested will be played by Alicia Silverstone in the inevitable movie) wrote her little-noticed 2,400-word story, “Is Enron Overpriced?”

Then, in October, the Journal ran a three-day series by Rebecca Smith and John Emshwiller detailing Enron’s unorthodox partnerships. Their articles are seen by many on Wall Street as ultimately sinking the company. Weil’s partisans think he should get credit for crossing the finish line first (an item, “Credit Due,” ran in “Page Six” recently).

But even Chanos says that “Bethany’s piece was the first one to raise really specific questions.”

Most of the Journal’s brain trust, though, are plugging Smith and Emshwiller, who, of course, wrote their stories in 2001 and are thus eligible for this year’s Pulitzers. “The Fortune story basically said this is a company that nobody understands,” says Journal deputy managing editor Daniel Hertzberg. “It didn’t show what was wrong with the company. It took Becky and John to do that.” That’s the competition.

Now for the judging. In January, Howard Kurtz, the Washington Post’s media writer, highlighted McLean as the first journalist to ask questions about Enron. Ten days later, the Times‘ Felicity Barringer wrote her profile of “the financial reporter everyone loves to lionize.” While McLean was being anointed as a journalistic sex symbol in a story hitherto dominated by a balding Kenneth Lay, folks at the Journal felt they were being robbed:

“People are trying to queer the Pulitzer pitch for the Journal,” says one editor there. That’s sour grapes, counters Kurtz: “In this case, a 31-year-old reporter beat them and the rest of the world by a considerable margin.”

In a bit of circular logic endemic to media reporters, Kurtz adds, “I must have been onto something, since after my piece appeared, she was profiled in the Times, given a contract by NBC, and offered a book deal.” As for McLean, she seems slightly embarrassed by all the attention. “I’ve told people I’ve gotten too much credit,” she says. “I did raise alarm bells, but I didn’t know the half of it.” “Read more: Enronathon http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/media/features/5756/#ixzz0dvvQZvUI

My Comment:

Please note also that the book was co-authored with Peter Elkind, who isn’t attributed in many of the stories.

Not that I’m all that sympathetic to the Wall Street Journal on the Enron story, since they don’t give credit to the alternative press either, and what goes around comes around. (My own experiences of plagiarism from articles and books can be found at the tab, ABOUT -  half-way down the page).

If liberal columnists steal without attribution even from liberal bloggers, can you imagine the cone of silence that descends when the victim isn’t liberal? Libertarians and conservatives get stripped clean by the vultures of the “free” (of all ethics) press.

With them, it’s never about public welfare or the good of the nation, even though that’s the standard that they like to foist on other people. Even with the global economy melting down under their noses, they’re jealous of sharing the information that activists, bloggers, and ordinary citizens give out generously for the common good.

(Again, there are honorable exceptions).

In short, they make up credit - just like the Federal Reserve.

Or they steal it - like their banker friends.

Or they collude with each other to “take-down” anyone not part of their game - just like their hedge-fund allies.

And no matter what, they always cover for each other.

Notice how other people’s personal lives are fair game for stalking, extortion, and exposes, but never theirs, as this piece on Maria Bartiromo suggests.

(Ms. McLean figures in that piece too. In fact, a brief google tells us that McLean´s had plagiarism problems and conflicts of interest more than a couple of times).

Item One. Here’s an earlier complaint about Fortune magazine plagiarism. A Fortune writer apparently used material from interviews and articles by an outfit called Annex Research, without attributing or acknowledging it. An email to Fortune got no response, either. The Fortune writer? Bethany McLean…

Item Two:  McLean at it again, swiping material from the Orange County Register Weekly

Item Three: Libertarian economist, Bill Anderson, in a piece called “The Most Dishonest ´Journalists´ In the Room,” describes how McLean was having a romantic relationship with the lead prosecutor in the Enron trial, Sean Berkowitz, before the sentencing, while she was covering the trial and getting out the government´s side of the story. Omitted in that story as well  was the disturbing fact that the prosecutor had suborned perjury in order to get a full conviction of Jeffrey Skilling.

And that´s besides Item Four….

That fetching stock-manipulation thing she had going with hedge buddies Marc Cohodes and Jim Chanos.

No wonder none of them can get the story right.

And no wonder they still won’t get it straight, not until after activists, or bloggers, or less-known writers at their own outfits or elsewhere do the hard work. Then they’ll slide in to take the credit.

Nice work.

Just as cushy and exploitative as anything on Wall Street, in its way.

Business men and real capitalists do the hard work of producing. Then the faux capitalist money-men and their shills in government rush in to cream the money off and cover themselves with glory via their mouthpieces in the shill media.

No wonder the media doesn’t understand capitalism. No wonder they love the crony capitalist bordello they call home. It’s the only one they know, the poor things.

[Again, they really ARE a minority of journalists, just a powerful minority. There are hundreds of honorable hard-working journalists who write their own stories rather than steal them off the net, whose names never get into headlines, and who wouldn't be caught dead behaving like this].

And don’t miss the other telling details:

Enron’s Ken Lay was a Republican.

Goldman Sachs is a Democrat cash-cow, for the most part.

Jim Chanos, hedge-fund master mind, used to work at Deutsch Bank.

And Bethany McLean was once a Goldman Sachs banker….. (Maybe that explains her kid-glove treatment of Hank at Vanity Fair).….

….And her equally interesting white-washing of Spyro Contogouris, who colluded with hedge funds to attack Prem Watsa’s Fairfax Financial.

Honestly.  Rielle Hunter has nothing on any of these gold-diggers.

Posted in Globalization, Kleptocracy, Media

Policing Wall Street…

// No Comments »

Posted in Kleptocracy

More From The Easter Bunny…

January 21, 2010 // No Comments »

I’ve been curious about the identity of the Easter Bunny, although, strictly speaking, it doesn’t affect the validity of the anti-NSS campaign.

The Bunny has zeal. Bunny-speak is brave, plain-spoken and easy to read:

“The SEC was created to reassure the unwashed masses that it was safe to invest in the markets, after the Great Crash of 1929 proved it was anything but. It was a PR firm for Wall Street, slipped through as an alternative to a regulator who would or could actually do anything to curb the real crookery on Wall Street. At the helm was one of the greatest stock manipulators of all time, Joe Kennedy, who along with Percy Rockefeller and others amassed incredible fortunes running stock pools in the 1920’s.

For those who don’t know what a stock pool is, it’s a hedge fund whose sole purpose is to manipulate stocks, first up, then down, making money in both directions. Which was enormously lucrative for the operators of the pools, and the investors therein - the only losers were always the general investing public, and other participants who weren’t on the inside. I would argue that’s precisely what some of the most lucrative hedge funds of modern times also do - there aren’t a lot of ways to beat the market with 30 or 40% returns, year after year, that don’t involve larceny and criminal behavior, at least in my study of the last century of market history.”

The Bunny doesn’t mince words:

“I concluded a while ago that the rot in the system is pervasive, runs from top to bottom, and is largely unfixable. You have oligarchs, powerful and rich families and corporations, who are having their bought-and-paid-for politicians operate the country for their personal enrichment, at the direct expense of everyone else…..

“My point is that absolute power and wealth enable one to control the safeguards that were put into place to protect populations. By co-opting politicians and capturing regulators, the bad man is allowed to come into the room and do whatever he wants, whenever he likes - and the captured media merely pretends that it can’t hear the cries for help or investigate the countless damaged lives. It’s as bad as Russia under the communists, or perhaps worse.”

The Easter Bunny stays under wraps for a reason I can guess… but maybe not express publicly.

I asked a couple of people in a position to know if it was so-and-so. They denied it stoutly.

I could, of course, go the route of the New York press, which likes to stake out, tap phones, access medical records illegally, go undercover,or violate court orders, or any number of other things.

Including hounding erstwhile presidential candidates long after they have ceased to be of political importance.

(If only John Edwards knew how lucky he was to avoid a life as a national figure, official prey for every predator with a pen)

But that particular game doesn’t seem worth either the moral or social candle. And, most often, almost as much can be learned by reading between the lines and studying public evidence as by sleuthing.

But, while sleuthing only requires elbow grease and chutzpah, analysis requires a degree of knowledge, judgment, and intellect that is simply beyond the pay-grade of some journalists, however exalted their professional status. These petty despots have pens and they have power, but they have no clothes, as surely as the emperor they shill for.

A few have figured that out. More will follow suit.

To make the story short, I went and reread a few public records that reference NSS and replayed the stout denials in my mind, recalling as best I could the silences, the gaps, the tone of the answers. I reread The Bunny carefully.

He’s an erudite man, it’s clear. I came to my conclusion about who he was. Right or wrong, time will tell.

I only bring it up to show how looking at the big picture and developing the correct perspective can be as useful and is far more cost-efficient than private-eye sleuthing that reporters think is the one and only credible way to tell a story. Baloney. And morally dangerous baloney. Dirty tricks, even for some intended good you believe in, inevitably corrupt the people who play them, in the same way  black ops corrupt intelligence agencies.

Sleuthing is good to add the footnotes and the QED at the bottom of a piece of research and critical analysis. But as a way of curing social cancers - and financial racketeering is more social cancer than legal infraction - it has limited use. By the time you have written your expose to your editor’s satisfaction and done what it takes to avoid libel litigation, the story is old, the crooks have covered their tracks in paper dirt, and a new game is afoot.

Far better to play Sherlock and deduce your conclusions. Leave the investigative reporters to do their thing. You do yours but you do it to appease your own conscience, out of love for what human beings might be (hard to love them as they are, frankly), out of sheer intellectual curiosity (a great part of what drives me), glee at pelting stones at arrogant predators, and…yes…because after life’s fretful fever, we really don’t know what comes next. It might be wise to hedge our bets, as Pascal did.

There may or may not be Judgment Day. But should it roll around, we want to be able to pass muster. Well, at least, we want the She: Who Is Probably Not There to know we tried…

And  then of course, we write mainly because it’s fun…

How, my dear Mary, — are you critic-bitten
(For vipers kill, though dead) by some review,
That you condemn these verses I have written,
Because they tell no story, false or true?
What, though no mice are caught by a young kitten,
May it not leap and play as grown cats do,
Till its claws come? Prithee, for this one time,
Content thee with a visionary rhyme.

(Percy B. Shelley, “The Witch of Atlas”)

Posted in Kleptocracy, Media, Pols and Pundits

Bill Anderson On The New KKK: Kleptocrats, Kartels, and Kon Men

January 20, 2010 // 3 Comments »

“As I see it, the bankers are not clueless at all. They understand the game, they understand that the government is going to clean up the mess that they and their friends in Congress and the Bush and Obama administrations have created, and they understand that their antics are going to give them what they always have wanted: a nice, cozy, financial cartel which will provide sweet political contributions for the political classes, bonuses and high pay for themselves, and very little for everyone else.

(more…)

Posted in Empire, Finance, Ideology, Kleptocracy

Former Spy Bosses, Goldman Exec Behind Full-Body Scanner

January 18, 2010 // 5 Comments »

I blogged earlier about the full-body scanner.

It turns out that one of the scanner’s strongest advocate, Michael Chertoff, former Homeland Security Czar, stands to gain by the sale of the scanner, via his security consulting outfit, Chertoff Group.

Its 8 members include 3 former senior executives from Homeland Security, 2 from the CIA, 3 from the NSA, 1 from FEMA, and 1 from Goldman Sachs. (more…)

Posted in Kleptocracy, Police State, Uncategorized

Goldman Charity Prompted By PR Concerns

// No Comments »

RaceTotheBottom, a law blog on corporate regulatory issues, has this on the latest PR move  by Goldman Sachs, one we noted in our previous blog post on Haiti. which mentioned the donations made by the big banks.

“The latest effort by Goldman to ameliorate the criticism is apparently to require top officers and managers to donate a certain percentage of their compensation to charity. As the NYT noted:

* While the details of the latest charity initiative are still under discussion, the firm’s executives have been looking at expanding their current charitable requirements for months and trying to understand whether such gestures would damp public anger over pay, according to a person familiar with the matter who did not want to be identified because of the delicacy of the pay issue.

Apparently Bear Stearns had done something similar in the past, requiring the top 1000 employees to contribute 4% of their compensation to charity.

The specifics have apparently not yet been determined. Nonetheless, unlike the stock bonuses, the approach effectively reduces the amount of compensation paid to each employee.

Goldman could have considered reducing the amounts paid in compensation and contributed the saved amounts directly to charity. The financial institution in fact added an additional $200 million to its charitable foundation. But making direct contributions would have potentially violated state law.

Corporations are obligated to profit maximize. Some portion of the company’s profits can be donated to charity. Companies may do so, however, only if there is a business benefit. See RMBCA § 3.02(15)(permitting “donations, or do any other act, not inconsistent with law, that furthers the business and affairs of the corporation.”). For modest amounts of contributions, the business benefit can be vague, with enhanced reputation in the community enough of a justification.

For more significant amounts, however, there must be a sufficient nexus to the business of the company. Had Goldman chosen to donate 5% of the amount left aside for compensation, an amount that would probably exceed $1 billion, it would have needed to show some type of meaningful connection to its business. Any failure to do so would likely generate lawsuits from shareholders alleging that the board had failed to engage in the required profit maximization.”

My Comment:

Isn’t this exactly why the more laws you have on the books, the more complicated your problems get?

Think about it. Goldman can’t make direct charitable contributions, because companies are obligated to maximize profits. Why are they obligated to maximize profits?

Because that’s what shareholders are due, per company law.

You might ask whether maximizing profits is always in a company’s best interests, versus building long term value or market share or any number of other things that stake-holders in the company might value more than high returns, but those things don’t count, because that’s how a law works - like a blunt instrument.

And then when managers focus on these short-term horizons and start doing legal (or illegal) tricks to show quick gains on their books, then we need another set of laws to curb them, with incentives running in the opposite direction….

The end result is a muddle of misplaced directives and restrictions that distort the market.
And people criticize the free market!

Posted in Ideology, Kleptocracy

Sith-Lord Sweep: AG’s Pending Indictments Cover Major Hedgies, Journalists, and Regulators

January 15, 2010 // 4 Comments »

Corporate finance generalist, investment banker and expert in derivatives, Austin Burrell, sums up last week’s announcement by Attorney-General Eric Holder that there are 5000 pending indictments [sic] arising out of the investigation of fraud in the capital markets:

[Note: the DOJ is involved in some 5000 odd cases of fraud related to the financial industry… (more…)

Posted in Finance, Ideology, Kleptocracy, Media

Hedge Funds: Top Ten Earners in 2007/2008

January 13, 2010 // No Comments »

New York Magazine had a piece in 2007 that sorted the hedge-fund elites into categories like “brainiacs” (like James Simon and Jim Chanos) and “bad boys” (like Daniel Loeb).

The category “Top dogs” (that is, the very best hedgies) includes SAC Capital Advisers/Steven Cohen ($12 b); Cerberus Capital/Stephen Feinberg ($19.5 b); Appaloosa Mgt/David Tepper ($5.3 b); ESL/Eddie Lampert ($18 b); Citadel Investment Group/Kenneth Griffin ($13.5 b); Manhattan/Michael Novogratz ($4.6b).

[Note: the figures were as of 2007].

This is the short list of the managers whom the industry thinks are top dogs, and of these six, one (Feinberg) is directly connected to Drexel Burnham Lambert, convicted junk bond financier Michael Milken’s bank; another (Cohen) is connected indirectly to Milken through Gruntal & Co.; and three are alumni of Goldman Sachs(Tepper, Lampert, Novogratz).

Five out of six and that’s just a cursory examination. I didn’t do anything more than google to get that.

And the financial press thinks there are no Sith Lords?

A more conventional ranking is found below: (more…)

Posted in Finance, Kleptocracy

Xmarks’ Top 20 Corruption Sites List Includes Deep Capture

January 2, 2010 // 4 Comments »

I just happened to notice this ranking of the most popular corruption sites and thought I’d post it as more evidence that the campaign against naked short selling isn’t some marginal “freak” show, as some of the financial blogs have tried to claim it is. (more…)

Posted in Kleptocracy

Steve Cohen, Third Biggest Owner of Sotheby’s In 2009 (Corrected)

December 30, 2009 // No Comments »

Modern Art Obsession has a post from April 2009 (see below) about Steve Cohen exhibiting a collection of his art at Sotheby’s, (where he  is the third largest owner). The exhibition ran exactly at the same time as Sotheby´s Spring Modern and Contemporary Auction. The Cohen art was not for sale.

Quote:

“So.. we guess there are other ways to dump an art collection skin a cat.

Hmmm… Maybe the page from the Billionaire Art Opportunist Collector playbook could be :

• Step 1.. Buy lots of Art, push prices way up, and tell everyone who’ll listenin the media you’re a wise long term buyer.
• (Photo #1, Richard Prince, “Graduate Nurse, 2002″,Ink jet print and acrylic on canvas,89 in x 52 in.   FYI… A description from Sotheby’s.. “This work is one of the best paintings Prince ever made, particularly because of its monumental scale and the rich, painterly quality of the brushstrokes”)
• Step 2.. Buy an art auction house (or a Whopping controlling interest in one),
• Step 3.. Stage a show of the great works having auction house experts tout your collection..
• Step 4..Tell everyone these art works, on proud display, are not for sale
• Step 5… Wait for someone stupid enough to say.. I wish I could have a collection like the one by this well known art collector, which just happens to be on display in the auction house.
• Step 6.. To be determined…. Hmm.. possibly.. Cash out..??

Note: Cohen’s SAC Capital amassed its position in Sotheby’s in the 6 months upto March 31, 2009, and  Sotheby’s shares doubled by June 2009 from a low in February.

Correction (January 7, 1020):  Cohen sold his stake in June:

The fund acquired its Sotheby’s stake between September and April, a period in which the auction house’s stock was battered by the financial crisis and a shrinking art market. The share price was below $10 for much of that period, down from a high of $61.40 at the end of the boom. This spring, the stock rebounded somewhat –­ it was $14.48 a share on June 30­, so SAC’s sale of its roughly four million shares was likely to have netted several million dollars

Posted in Kleptocracy

Lazard-Freres Insider Trading Bust

December 28, 2009 // 11 Comments »

I missed these arrests from back in mid-December:

“U.S. prosecutors filed criminal charges against a former Lazard Freres banker on Wednesday for alleged insider trading that earned him and others $500,000 in illegal profits.

The trading involved some of the highest profile deals during the leveraged buyout boom of 2005 to 2007, including the buyout of TXU Corp, as it was formerly known, for $44 billion, including debt.

The charges were brought against Adnan Zaman, a former vice president at Lazard Freres, in federal court in San Francisco.

Financial regulators also filed civil charges against him and Vinayak Gowrish, a former associate at private equity firm TPG Capital, saying the one-time fraternity brothers stole confidential stock tips and then passed them on to friends. In return, the men received cash kickbacks.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission settled the civil case with Zaman, who agreed to return $78,456 in ill-gotten gains and to be permanently barred from associating with any financial broker or dealer.

The SEC said that Gowrish and Zaman, friends since high school, tipped two friends, Pascal Vaghar and Sameer Khoury. Vaghar and Khoury also settled with the SEC.”

More at Reuters.

My Comments

Is it just me, or does there seem to be an awfully high number of desis (Hindi for home-boy).

What´s with these guys?

As a fellow desi, I have to hang my head. World-class education, world-class jobs, better than world-class salaries…and a world-class racket.

Posted in Kleptocracy

Warren Buffett To Promote Paulson Book

// 2 Comments »

Now, we don´t want to read too much into this announcement, but, really, promoting Paulson´s book? What´s Buffett going to say?

I really really like that chapter where Hank had to take over the US government.…you know, after he pushed Bear Stearns and Lehman over with the help of his  hedge-fund buddies…and all but nationalized housing.

Or

Gee, Hank´s into that cap-and-trade collectivist boondoggle that just got outed as a total rip-off  and a fraud made up by climate change fanatics but hey, give the guy a break, will ya? We´re all capitalists here…..you know, like, state capitalists..wazza big deal?

Or

Yeah, I know. Vanity Fair, that bastion of free markets and free minds, already did its bit for Hank´s place in history when it got down on its knees and..um.. blew…up.. the guy into some kind of I´m-taking-on-the-slings-and-arrows-for-the-greater-good-profile-in-courage long before me, and yeah, Bethany  did her bit for Hank too.. but every little effort counts…

I´ve had my doubts about Buffett´s involvement in the bail-out.

This doesn´t make them go away…

Posted in Finance, Kleptocracy, Media

Secretive Steve Cohen On Talk Show Discussing Relationship With Ex—

December 27, 2009 // No Comments »

I’d been avoiding mentioning the by-now famous clip of Steve Cohen on a talk show back in 1992, because it seems like a low blow. I mean, hit the guy over the head on insider trading, but don’t worm around in the trash can for dirt on him. Of course, he did put himself on the show…

But, either way, there’s one angle that is relevant.

If you’re billed as the most secretive guy in the hedge world, presumably because you’re a reclusive, crowd-shy financial genius, what does it say that you once got onto a TV show called Cristina of none-too-distinguished caliber to discuss intimate details of your personal life?

Hmm. That’d hardly what I call shrinking violet material.

Here, sans video (because we don’t drag people’s families in the mud on this blog) is the lowdown at New York Magazine:

“Shortly after they were married in 1992, Steve Cohen, the notoriously secretive hedge-fund manager at SAC Capital, and his second wife, Alex, went on the short-lived English-language version of the popular talk show Christina. The episode? “He Acts Like Her Husband!” The subject discussed? Steve’s too-close relationship with his ex-wife, Patricia Cohen, who recently filed a $300 million lawsuit against him.”

Think about that for a moment.

Psychologically, that doesn’t make any sense for a reclusive genius…

But, just suppose, what you have here is not a shy geeky genius (or maybe, I should qualify that - not solely a shy geeky genius) but a guy who was quite at home at a shady broker called Gruntal & Co. in the 1980s -  a broker that had ties to the Russian mob and to a whole set of players to whom ‘reclusive’ and ’shy’ are the last words you’d apply. Just suppose what you have here is a guy who was a player in that crowd….making his way any way he could. And just suppose, that past is why he keeps a low profile…

Just suppose.

It’s at least a distinct possibility.

But what’s more like a high probability is that anyone who puts out an article on Steve Cohen like this one or this one by John Carney has lost quite a bit of his credibility on Steven Cohen and on a few things closely related like, say, insider trading…or naked shorting….

Carney’s explanation why Steven Cohen can have done no wrong? A SAC trader told him so. That’s why.

“The trader described the enormous, football field sized trading floor at SAC as “the cleanest in the biz.”

A SAC trader says SAC is 100 percent clean. Because?

Well, that part of it isn’t mentioned in the article, although a lot of other stuff which sure as heck sounds super close to insider trading is.

“When I was there, we put tons of pressure on our brokers to make sure they gave us any information they had fast and first,“

And what was that John Carney was calling Matt Taibbi only a couple of months ago?

Naive?

Posted in Kleptocracy, Media

Janet Tavakoli Faces Off With Goldman On AIG CDOs

December 26, 2009 // 2 Comments »

Janet Tavakoli in Market Watch

“Earlier, Goldman denied it could have known this was a problem, yet acknowledged I had warned about the grave risks at the time. If Goldman wants to stick to its story that it didn’t know the gun was loaded, then it is not in the public interest to rely on Goldman’s opinion about the greater risk it now poses to the global markets.

Goldman excuses its participation by saying its counterparties were sophisticated and had the resources to do their own research. This is a fair point if Goldman were defending itself in a lawsuit with a sophisticated investor trying to recover damages. It is not a valid point when discussing public funds that were used to bail out AIG, Goldman, and Goldman’s “customers.”

Goldman claims the portfolios were fully disclosed to its customers. Yet at the time of the AIG bailout, Goldman did not disclose the nature of its trades with AIG, and Goldman did not disclose these portfolios to the U.S. public. If it had, the public might have balked at the bailout.

The public is an unwilling majority owner in AIG, and public money was funneled directly to Goldman Sachs as a result of suspect activity. The circumstances of AIG’s crisis were extraordinary and without precedent. I maintain that the public is owed reparations, and it would be fair to make all of AIG’s counterparties buy back the CDOs at full price, and they can keep the discounted value themselves.”

Posted in Kleptocracy

Reverse Midas: SAC Spin-Offs Fail Even When They Succeed

// 1 Comment »

Reading this report about SAC Capital by Reuters, I was struck by a few things.

But first, here’s the chronology (skip below for my argument):

• 1980s: Steven Cohen allegedly involved in insider trading at Gruntal

• 1999-2004, 2004-2007, 2007-2009: Insider trading at Spherix (ex-SAC trader Richard Lee’s own firm); and possibly at Stratix (founded by Goodman and Grodin in 2004, also ex-SAC traders, with SAC as a sizable investor); and (again, possibly) at SAC itself, by Richard Lee and Ali Far, also an alum of SAC.

• 2006: SEC investigates SAC and two other firms for manipulation of Fairfax Financial stock. Investigation dropped in 2007

• 2007-2009: Agent Kang investigates 20 hedge funds for insider trading

• 2007: SEC investigates SAC over Andrew Tong’s sex charges. Case sealed in 2008. Reopened in Nov. 2009, this time focusing on insider trading. About this time, Richard Grodin’s and Ian Goodman’s firm Stratix (where Lee and Far worked) closes. Grodin then begins Quadrum, which also closes

• Oct-Nov 2009: Galleon Group charged by Kang with insider trading and 14 traders arrested, including former SAC traders, Richard Lee and Ali Far

• Nov-Dec 2009: Cohen’s ex-wife alleges insider trading when Cohen was at Gruntal & Co. in the 1980s

• Dec. 2009: Ex-SAC trader and founder of Stratix Richard Grodin subpoenaed

**************************************************************************************************************

Now that you have that in mind, here are the things that struck me:

1. The high number of SAC traders who seem to have gone off into their own businesses.

You’d think with all that money and the fund’s record as the most consistently successful in the business (only one bad year on record), their traders would stay forever. Quite the opposite.  People seem to have been leaving all the time to form their own businesses.

But SAC was also said to be a very tough environment. You produced, or you left.

So maybe that’s why Lee and Far, Grodin and Goodman, all left to found their own firms?
Could be. But I’m not convinced.

2. None of the spin-off firms seems to have been very successful.

Why not? Why couldn’t these hot-shot traders make money on their own?

The Reuters piece suggests that perhaps the SAC experience didn’t foster business ability. And that perhaps SAC traders flounder without SAC’s huge supporting cast.

But those things are likely to be true of other firms as well, not solely SAC.

Still not convinced.

Furthermore, consider this.

3. A spin-off fund that didn’t get money from Cohen ended up quite successful:

“Healthcor, a healthcare industry focused fund, had raised $3.2 billion by June 2009 since launching four years ago. The fund returned 25 percent in 2006, 18 percent in 2007, and was up 4 percent last year, when the average hedge fund lost 19 percent. In the first 10 months of 2009, Healthcor was up 7 percent.

Healthcor, founded by Arthur Cohen and Joseph Healey, opened without any financial support from SAC. In fact, soon after Cohen and Healey struck out on their own, SAC sued the pair, accusing them of breaching their employment contracts. The matter ultimately was settled. (Healthcor’s Cohen is not related to SAC’s Cohen).”

4. Even spin-offs that were doing well were shut down.

When Stratix started in 2004, it had $60 million given to it by SAC. When it shut down, in 2007, it was up 17% and had $530 million under management. Yet it shut down. Why did it shut down? Those numbers sound pretty good.

Another spin-off, Fontana Capital, started out in 2005 with $50 million of SAC money. It grew to $325 million by 2006.  But sometime in 2007, Cohen pulled out all his money. And in 2009, Fontana was down to $16.1 million, despite being down only 7.69%, compared to the average S&P Financial index loss of 57%. Again, that sounds like it wasn’t doing all that bad.

Reuters quotes someone familiar with the record of ex-SAC traders:

“So many of the ex-SAC people seem to have this model where they attract you with fantastic returns in the first year but in year two or three or four you get annihilated,” said a person who is familiar with several former SAC employees’ records.

Shades of Bernie Madoff….

Someone need to look closely at what happened to the money at these firms…

Posted in Kleptocracy

SEC Subpoenas Former SAC Trader Grodin

December 25, 2009 // No Comments »

El Economista carries this Reuters report, dating from yesterday, Dec. 24, on the SEC´s subpoena of a former manager at Steven Cohen´s SAC Capital hedge-fund:

“Federal prosecutors in the Galleon Group case have sent a subpoena to a former employee of Steven A. Cohen’s SAC Capital Advisors, a sign that the scope of the problem into the largest hedge-fund insider trading case in history is expanding, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

The subpoena seeks trading records from a former SAC hedge fund manager, Richard Grodin, who employed a cooperating witness in the insider trading case announced last week, the Journal said.”

My Comment

It’s all getting pretty tangled, so first let me try to bring some order into the picture.

• I blogged, via Terri Buhl, that hedge-funds are going SAC-remote, deleting their email records and changing their trading positions so they don´t look too similar to Cohen´s, in anticipation of a probe. And now here come the subpoenas.

• The subpoena to Grodin arises out of the two-year FBI investigation of twenty hedge-funds that became public in October 2009 with the Galleon arrests.

• The investigation is headed by FBI agent B. J. Kang.

• Kang also led the probe into the alleged stock manipulation of Fairfax Financial in 2006, in which SAC was one of three hedge-funds involved.

• So far, Kang’s probe has led to a series of arrests of traders involved with Galleon Group in October and November, among them two former SAC traders. (A third, Mark Adams, is also suspected of insider trading).

• The two traders, Richard Choo-Beng Lee, and Ali Far, have admitted that they were involved in insider trading not only at their own fund Spherix, but  going back to 1994. This makes it highly probable that they were also trading illegally at SAC, where Lee worked for about five years.

• Specifically, the agreement Far and Lee signed with the US Attorney’s Office charges conspiracies to commit insider trading from 2007-2009, from 2004-2007, and from 1999-2004.

• Galleon chief Raj Rajaratnam’s brother Rengan, who was investigated for insider trading at his firm Sedna, also worked for SAC in 2003.

• Lee is also going to be testifying about any insider trading he might have done at another firm, Stratix, which was founded by former SAC trader Richard Grodin, and yet another SAC alumnus, Ian Goodman.

• Stratix, whose investors include SAC (is your head whirling?), shut down in 2007.

• Then Grodin began another firm, Quadrum, which also shut down (”abruptly”, says Reuters).

• Also, in November, we had the bizarre revelations of Andrew Tong, who claims he was sodomized and forced into oral sex, cross-dressing, and the ingestion of female hormones (to make him the perfect androgynous trader) by his boss, SAC trader Ping Jiang. Investigated in 2007, the case was dismissed as lacking in substance. The records were sealed, leaving many people feeling that the SEC, as a Harvard paper recently confirmed, tends to go after smaller rather than bigger fish.

• But in November ‘09, the Tong case was opened again and given wide attention on the internet, this time with more attention to Tong’s claims that Ping Jiang forced him to into illegal trading that led to a $3 million loss. The loss was the reason SAC gave for Tong’s firing. But Tong himself claims that that was just an excuse and that the sexual harassment was the real reason. He also claims that Cohen knew what was going on and didn’t care, as long as money was being made. In keeping with the firm’s reputation for secrecy, Cohen made everyone sign confidentiality agreements and kept even top officers in the company out of the loop.

• These revelations have been followed by new charges made by Cohen´s ex-wife Patricia that her husband had cheated her out of money in their divorce settlement. Some of that money, she now claims, was hidden from the government and came from illegal insider-trading by  Cohen was he was a young trader in the 1980s at Gruntal & Co., a shady brokerage with a history of embezzlement and scandal.

***************************************************************************************************************

NOTE:

**If you want to understand the modus operandi of one of these insider trading deals, read Deep Capture´s latest analysis. It displays some of the emails sent by certain hedge-funds that colluded with SAC in the manipulation of the stocks of Fairfax Financial, Jim Chanos´Kynikos and Third Point among them.

The Fairfax investigation (opened in 2006) petered out, but Deep Capture’s email collection nixes any chance that the record can be wiped clean by any of the funds involved (you can also see Bagley´s piece posted at Seeking Alpha).

Posted in Kleptocracy

Den Of Thieves: Hedge-Hogs Go Into SAC-Remote Mode

December 23, 2009 // 4 Comments »

Update: Deep Capture indicates that they have some emails proving insider trading, so any attempts to delete files/emails by SAC and other firms might not be any good, since  the files just happen to implicate said firms in…insider trading.

Ah, the web we weave…etc. etc.

Terry Buhl at Hedge Fund-Implode.com reports that residents of hedgefund land are going into SAC-remote mode:

“Funds like Blue Ridge, Greenlight, Third Point, Glenview, and Maverick are cutting back on any contact with King Stevie. When we asked major players such as Jim Chanos and others if they’ve been pinging Stevie about a trade lately, you’ll get a very defensive `no.’ Why? Because word on the street is they all think FBI special agent BJ Kang, who is now dogging Stevie, has the goods to deliver the hammer soon in the form of  an indictment or arrest for insider trading.

Extra measures are being taken to hire data-miners to comb through any and all emails firms and their trading consultants ever sent to anyone at SAC in an attempt to erase them from internet memory. According to traders we talked with, they are even going as far as getting out of trades that might look similar to any of Stevie’s. So it looks like running due diligence on your `SAC risk’ to prove to your investors that you’re clean – like Larry Robbins of Glenview capital just did – is the new `killing it’.”

My Comment:

Just to recap.

*Steven Cohen is the multibillionaire chief of legendary hedge-fund SAC, which sits at the top of the heap among funds. Cohen, famously reclusive, is said to have had only one bad year of trading.

Now he´s having a bad time from the  FBI investigation of the insider-trading case against New York-based hedge-fund Galleon Group, which is proving to have teeth in it.

SAC has a history of elbows-and-knees-style trading practices, according to this 2003 Business Week article.

*The head of Galleon (which once managed $7 billion in assets), Sri Lanka-born Raj Rajaratnam was arrested, along with five others, on October 16  in a $17 million dollar insider-trading case brought by federal prosecutors and the FBI.

(The numbers vary: it´s $20.8 million, according to a later WSJ report, and $25 million in a NY Daily report)

*The case was unusual in that FBI agent B. J. Kang used wire-tapping for the investigation (normally used only in drug-related cases).

*The Galleon arrests were quickly followed by other arrests of  traders, lawyers and hedge-fund managers on November 5, including one Zvi Goffer, who, as the brains of the insider network, was referred to as “the octopussy.” This brought the total number of arrests in the case to 14 (Correction on 12/29: I read 20 elsewhere) and added another $20 million to the fraud, already the biggest in Wall Street history since the days of Ivan Boeksy in the 1980s.

*On December 16, Steven Cohen´s ex-wife Patricia accused him of hiding millions from her and of insider trading in a 1986 merger when Cohen was a young trader at now-defunct broker, Gruntal.

*Indicted on December 17 (December 15, according to one source) by a Federal grand jury  on multiple criminal counts of insider trading and securities fraud,  Rajaratnam  pleaded not guilty. Many of the charges against him carry upto 20 year prison sentences. The trial is expected to take place in the summer of 2010.

*The broker Gruntal has an interesting history, in that it seems to be the place where several of the biggest names on Wall Street (aka some of the most crooked players) crossed paths:

Bernie Madoff, Ezra Merkel (Madoff fund associate), Ivan Boesky (infamous 1980s trader), Michael Milken (junk bond innovator), Carl Icahn (famed and feared corporate raider), Steven Feinberg, ,…and yes, Steven Cohen:

From Deep Capture:

“Another of Madoff’s most important “feeders” was J. Ezra Merkin, who managed the Ariel Fund, which seems to have been designed specifically to raise money for Madoff’s fraudulent investment business. In this regard, the New York attorney general has described “Merkin’s deceit, recklessness, and breaches of fiduciary duty…”

While Merkin was “deceitfully” feeding the Madoff Ponzi, he was also a co-owner, along with Steve Feinberg, of Cerberus Capital Management, a fund named after the mythological three-headed dog that guards the gates of Hell.

Previously, Feinberg was a top trader for Michael Milken at Drexel Burnham Lambert. After Drexel, Mr. Feinberg moved (on Milken’s recommendation) to a brokerage called Gruntal & Company.”

Gruntal owed its existence to the generous junk bond finance that its parent company, the Home Group, received from Michael Milken. Its options department was founded by Carl Icahn, who later became a “prominent” billionaire owing to the junk bond finance that he received from Michael Milken.

When Icahn left Gruntal, he was replaced by a Milken crony named Ron Aizer, who proceeded, on the recommendation of Milken, to hire two traders.

The first trader hired by Aizer was, according to a reliable source, investigated by the SEC for trading on inside information that he received from Milken’s operation at Drexel Burnham Lambert. This trader is now a “prominent” billionaire and the manager of a well-known hedge fund. The second trader hired by Aizer is now also a “prominent” hedge fund manager, though he is not quite a billionaire. Both of these traders play important roles in the story of Dendreon. Carl Icahn, the founder of Gruntal’s options department, has a cameo role, too.”

There is more, of course, much more to the story, and many more names, including Michael Steinhardt, Marc Rich who was pardoned by Clinton for tax evasion and dealing with Iran against US law, and many others, but that would make this post far too long, so I will send you instead  to this page.…and this...for now.

(Of course, we could ask why hedge-funds with an edge get to be prosecuted, while governments with the biggest edge of all don´t  - but there, we won´t spoil the fun).

Posted in Kleptocracy

Sad SAC: Reuters Spikes Hedge Story On Complaints From Steve Cohen

December 22, 2009 // No Comments »

Via Finalternatives:

“Reuters opted against running a story about alleged insider-trading on the part of SAC Capital Advisors founder Steven Cohen after Cohen himself complained about the news agency’s coverage, a journalism blog reports.

Cohen repeatedly called Devin Wenig, CEO of Thompson Reuters Markets Division and the second-in-command at Reuters parent Thomson Reuters, according to Talking Biz News. The hedge fund boss reportedly complained that the story, which the University of North Carolina blog reports would have been an “incremental” advance in the story of alleged insider-trading more than 20 years ago, was part of a pattern of persecution on the part of Reuters.

Wenig forwarded Cohen’s complaints to Reuters editor-in-chief David Schlesinger, who in turn referred the story to editors. Those editors debated the story, written by Matthew Goldstein, before deciding to kill it after three days.

“We make decisions on whether or not to run stories purely on journalistic grounds,” a Reuters spokesman told Talking Biz News.

Goldstein was the first reporter to cite the unsealed court documents that include explosive allegations against SAC and former SAC portfolio manager Ping Jiang. Cohen’s ex-wife, Patricia, last week sued him for $300 million, accusing him of insider-trading, perjury and hiding assets from her and from the authorities.”

My Comment

Looks like more confirmation of the Deep Capture thesis - that major newspapers are bending over backwards…and forwards….for the big hedge funds.

I notice that Hedge World has picked this story up….as well it should, it’s a big one… and very kindly links this blog, as well as the ever-alert zerohedge - the only MSM-touted blog I truly dig, mainly because I dig the characters on it.

Earlier, I blogged that Steven Cohen was also having problems with a militant ex-missus, who has gone public with allegations that he perjured himself, hid money from the government (here we are on Stevie’s side), and did other sorts of naughty things, like insider trading, that reclusive billionaires really shouldn’t do, not if they want to stay either reclusive or billionaires.

We have much more sympathy for Mr. Cohen, of course, than we do for the self-important twits and petty tyrants who fly their bylines at major newspapers with little respect for the body politic. At least, we understand simple greed. But the weedy vanity of the pen-pushing mob needs to be exposed for what it is. 

Now comes Mr. Goldstein, who clearly suffers from the delusion that his job is to break important stories, no matter how exalted the net worth of the subjects. That didn’t sit well with his boss, and now the dirty laundry is out in the open.

Meanwhile, as if irate Sith ladies and spiked stories weren’t enough, there’s also a forced oral sex- cross-dressing- cum- sexual-harassment suit coming back from the past to haunt Sad SAC.

Who knew you could have so much fun without getting naked (shorted)?

Posted in Kleptocracy, Media

SEC’s Own Accounting Is Deficient

December 20, 2009 // No Comments »

Apparently, the SEC, top regulator of financial fraud, isn’t up to snuff keeping its own financial books…
We don’t say it’s cooking its books, but it sure looks like if someone wanted, they could cook them quite easily, according to this report at law.com:

“The GAO found that the SEC “did not have effective internal control over its financial reporting as of Sept. 30, 2009.”
As part of its mission, the SEC is charged with enforcing strict financial disclosure rules for public companies. Apparently, it is less adept at policing itself.
For example, the GAO reported that SEC’s general ledger system allows unauthorized personnel to view, manipulate or destroy data, and that “serious unauthorized activity” may remain undetected.
Until the SEC fixes these problems, the GAO found, the SEC can’t be sure “1) its financial statements, taken as a whole, are fairly stated; 2) the information the SEC relies on to make decisions on a daily basis is accurate, complete, and timely; and 3) sensitive data and financial information are appropriately safeguarded.”
Nor could the SEC “provide evidence that it monitored controls over its payroll exception reports to ensure payroll transactions were recorded accurately and timely.”
While the GAO did credit the SEC with producing statements that were “fairly stated in all material respects,” it flagged “six significant deficiencies” for FY 2008 and 2009.

The six areas are:

• information security;
• financial reporting process;
• fund balance with Treasury;
• registrant deposits;
• budgetary resources;

My Comment:

Translated, those six problem areas amount to this:
No one can really be sure if or when

1. Someone steals information from the SEC
2. Something is wrong in the SEC’s accounts
3. How much money the SEC has with the Treasury
4. How much money the SEC takes in
5. How the SEC is doing on an ongoing basis

Chew on that…

Posted in Finance, Kleptocracy

IPCC Chief Pachauri Central To Cap-and-Trade Scam

December 19, 2009 // 1 Comment »

From Mish Shedlock:

“The crux of the scheme is this: European steelmakers have threatened to leave the EU for India, eliminating the jobs of thousands of workers in the process, unless the EU grants the steelmakers free carbon credits worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

Eurofer, a European trade group, is at the center of the scheme. The web of the plot, however, weaves in not only several companies, but also the United Nations’ climate change chief:

* Among its members, Eurofer represents two EU steelmakers, Corus Redcar and ArcelorMittal, each of which has ties to India as well as to Rajendra K. Pachauri, the Indian industrial engineer who has been chairman of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, since 2002.

* Eurofer appears to have coordinated a threat to the European Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading System that its steelmakers would move their operations from the EU to India unless the EU cap-and-trade exchange issued them – at no cost – carbon emissions permits worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

* Once the bureaucrats in Brussels acquiesced, Corus Redcar and ArcelorMittal maneuvered to cash in windfall profits from the EU carbon permits given them at no cost.

* Additionally, Corus Redcar has now announced a decision to close operations in Great Britain nonetheless and relocate its steelmaking activities to India in order to gain additional U.N. carbon credits.

Ironically, EU and U.N. officials who might have thought requiring cap-and-trade permits would operate as “protection racket” in which EU companies need to buy carbon credits to continue operations, have now found themselves on the losing end of the reverse scheme.

In the final analysis, the winners are the European Union corporations willing to play hardball with the European Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading System, and the losers are the EU middle class workers that are held hostage in the scheme.”

Posted in Finance, Globalization, Kleptocracy

Wall Street: The Crematory Of Capitalism

// 10 Comments »

Bill Cara:

“Independent traders know as a fact that Humungous Bank & Broker (HB&B) research analysts are biased and unaccountable. We also know they give short-term tips to their firm’s proprietary traders and sales people that are at odds with their longer-term published opinions. These unfair practices are permitted because the fundamental conflict of interest structure of the securities industry is permitted.

Today the Wall St Journal has reported that FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) has launched a broad inquiry into how up to a dozen Wall Street firms disseminate stock ratings and research. Important questions are being asked.

On August 24 this year, WSJ informed the public of how Goldman Sachs analysts were tipping their traders with info that differed from published reports. These regular meetings were called “trading huddles”. At the time, I called it insider trading, which is criminal.”

My Comment:

A reader commented earlier that “insider trading” is a big yawn as a story  (for the latest insider trading arrest, see this case, of an ex-banker from Lazard, a relatively small case, admittedly)

Someone might come to that conclusion only if their knowledge of the practice were abstract and based on theoretical debate on the subject. But anyone who knows the history of the capital markets over the last 30 years or so knows that a big part of the story is that investment (merchant) banks turned into traders by the end of the century and that their proprietary trading became more important to them than their retail clients or customers. I’ve written about this in relation to Goldman Sachs, which was the most egregious (because it was the most powerful) of the lot.

Insider trading is essentially a failure of banking as a profession, with professional ethics. There is a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders (in the case of a company) and of clients (in the case of banks).  Conflict-of-interest is a problem in every other work place. Why not here?

Besides conflict-of-interest, insider trading involves an explicit fraud on the client.

That’s in addition to the crime of fractional brokering, as someone cleverly puts it. (This is quite different from fractional banking. Due to the confusion of language that lets banks perform both safe holding and investing functions at once, fractional banking is legal).  On the other hand, “fractional brokering,” which is what naked shorting and “fails-to-delivered” amount to, is illegal.

Unfortunately, the professional financial reporters seem too myopic to understand the gravity of the problem, our self-involved “gonzo” journalists (yes you, Matt Taibbi) are too politically-driven to explain it correctly, and right now I’m too disgusted by the intellectual dishonesty of the media to take the trouble to make the argument on the web and see it lifted by all and sundry with nary a link or footnote, let alone verbal acknowledgment.

As Cara points out correctly (and safely, since he’s in Canada), Wall Street and the American capital markets have become a joke, and a substantial part of the financial media still doesn’t seem to realize it’s the punchline.

That gives me no pleasure to say. For years, I defended American business to my foreign friends, claiming that Americans at least held to standards, regulations, and transparency requirements higher than theirs (meaning, Indian and non-Western).

Behind all the glitz “America” still operated somewhere, I argued.

The Marxists and communists who called the whole thing a charade and a lie didn’t quite get it, I was sure. The values of the American republic would prevail. Once most money-managers and businessmen were alerted to what was going on in the markets, I fully expected that their outrage would be enough to stem the rot. I saw CEOs stepping up to the plate and doing their duty, when the future of their own (rather than someone else’s) children was at stake.
That was four and a half years ago, when I first began researching the markets.

In retrospect,  I see I was incredibly naive.The rot goes deep.

Those are somber thoughts to have around Christmas time. But perhaps not inappropriate. If you recall, in the Christmas story, gold (or should I say, gld?) and frankincense were only two-thirds of the offering. The other third was myrrh. Myrrh is a resin whose oil, I read here, is used for embalming and whose incense is used by penitents at funerals and cremations.

That must be the bitter scent I smell rising from the capital markets.

Posted in Kleptocracy

Ex-Sith Lady Uses RICO On Sith Lord (?)

December 17, 2009 // 3 Comments »

The ex-wife of Steven A. Cohen, legendary multi-billionaire manager of hedge-fund SAC, whom the ever controversial (and confrontational) Patrick Byrne has for some time been suggesting is the, or perhaps, one of the Sith Lord/s of Wall Street, is using RICO laws to get a bigger settlement from her former husband. That´s turned up some interesting accusations:

“In Ms. Cohen’s version of events, her husband and his brother, Donald Cohen, orchestrated a long-running racketeering scheme. She says her former husband lied under oath about his net worth, conducted mail and wire fraud, and concealed from her and the Supreme Court of New York millions of dollars that he possessed in 1990, thus reducing her divorce settlement.

Even in this post-Madoff era, the accusations might seem outlandish. Mr. Cohen, known as Stevie, is one of the nation’s most successful money managers. With a $13 billion hedge fund and a sumptuous Connecticut estate, he is, at 53, a Wall Street legend.

But all of this comes at an uncomfortable moment for Mr. Cohen and his company, SAC Capital Advisors. Since federal prospectors began making arrests in a major insider trading investigation in October, SAC, which is based in Stamford, Conn., has been linked to the case.

A former SAC analyst has pleaded guilty on charges related to insider trading that occurred years after he left the firm and has agreed to provide any information he might have about insider trading that occurred when he was at SAC. No current SAC employee or manager has been charged with wrongdoing.”

and this:

“She claims in her suit that in 1985, while they were married, Mr. Cohen confessed to her that he received inside information about the takeover of RCA by General Electric, a megadeal of the 1980s that prompted a sweeping insider-trading investigation. The Securities and Exchange Commission dropped its investigation after bringing charges against a G.E. executive and a Houston family with ties to a Wall Street bank.”

and this:

“When the couple divorced, Mr. Cohen stated that, on paper, he had a net worth of $16.9 million. But $8.7 million of that was “worthless,” he said, because of a bad real estate deal with Mr. Lurie.”

Lurie, who later fell out with Cohen, claimed that the money he got from Cohen to put through the deal came from an SAC trading account.…

My Comment

And some substantiation for the charges can be found in this WSJ story on Goldman Sachs analysts tipping off their own traders first and then favored hedge-funds (SAC at the head of them), before their own clients(which I noted in 2006).
See also this Deep Capture post.

Apparently, it´s not easy street being a Sith Lord. You never know when your spurned Sith Lady (not to mention various disgruntled Sith Knaves) might spring out from the shadows to expose what´s apparently standard operating procedure in the money business.

(Sigh) Not even a Greenwich mansion seems worth it (for a colorful account of the culture of the hedgies, whom we call the bubble kings, see “The High Way Robbers,” in ¨Mobs, Messiahs and Markets,”(Bonner & Rajiva, Wiley 2007).

I said this a long time ago  in “Three Card Capitalists”

The market collapse might have been triggered proximately by failed sub-prime loans, but the deeper sources of it lie in the massive fraud and corruption that go back to the  1980s, and even earlier, to the 1970s.

Posted in Kleptocracy

Open Letter To The Secretary-General Of UN

December 9, 2009 // 2 Comments »

Dear Secretary-General,

Climate change science is in a period of ‘negative discovery’ - the more we learn about this exceptionally complex and rapidly evolving field the more we realize how little we know. Truly, the science is NOT settled.

Therefore, there is no sound reason to impose expensive and restrictive public policy decisions on the peoples of the Earth without first providing convincing evidence that human activities are causing dangerous climate change beyond that resulting from natural causes. Before any precipitate action is taken, we must have solid observational data demonstrating that recent changes in climate differ substantially from changes observed in the past and are well in excess of normal variations caused by solar cycles, ocean currents, changes in the Earth’s orbital parameters and other natural phenomena.

We the undersigned, being qualified in climate-related scientific disciplines, challenge the UNFCCC and supporters of the United Nations Climate Change Conference to produce convincing OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE for their claims of dangerous human-caused global warming and other changes in climate. Projections of possible future scenarios from unproven computer models of climate are not acceptable substitutes for real world data obtained through unbiased and rigorous scientific investigation.
Specifically, we challenge supporters of the hypothesis of dangerous human-caused climate change to demonstrate that:

Variations in global climate in the last hundred years are significantly outside the natural range experienced in previous centuries;

Humanity’s emissions of carbon dioxide and other ‘greenhouse gases’ (GHG) are having a dangerous impact on global climate;

Computer-based models can meaningfully replicate the impact of all of the natural factors that may significantly influence climate…”

For the rest of the post and the complete list of signatories, see Climate realists.

Posted in Finance, Globalization, Kleptocracy

Hedge-Fund Pays Naked Shorting Critic Byrne $5 Million

// 1 Comment »

Copper River Partners (formerly Rocker Partners), the short-selling hedge-fund of David Rocker and Marc Cohodes, and associated entities have settled a case brought against them in 2005 by Patrick Byrne, CEO of embattled internet retailer Overstock, according to  The Register.

Note: The suit doesn´t charge naked shorting, but defamation and illegal collusion with research analysts.

Copper River worked with a research firm, Gradient Analytics, that  employed well-known financial journalist Herb Greenberg, one of the central figures in the story of the “capture” (corruption) of Wall Street journalists by speculators. Hedge funds stand accused of engaging in illegal collusion with journalists to drive down stock-prices of companies.

Last year, Gradient settled for a figure between $1.5-$2 million and issued an apology. Now comes this further vindication.

Despite the relatively trivial amount won in the Rocker case, $5 million, it´s noteworthy that the settlement does all the things victory in an actual court trial does, without the risk of losing on a technicality.

It also underscores something I´ve been suggesting for a while.

That public interest blogging and journalism alone isn´t enough.

It´s necessary to actually sue or inflict damage of some kind to score victories in these things.

Unfortunately, that´s usually not worth doing for people who aren´t wealthy.  Vicariously, however, we “little people” can at least relish the spectacle of the behemoths of finance getting it in the rump.

And this case  could prove to be a model for similar lawsuits by other embattled companies.

Still to come is Overstock´s suit against 12 prime broker-dealers (including Goldman Sachs), which will go to trial in late 2010. The suit charges an illegal stock market manipulation scheme.

Also in the works, the SEC, which dropped its investigation of Gradient in 2007, has now turned its sights on Byrne. Given Byrne´s  charge of regulatory and media capture, there are some who see this as retaliatory.

Posted in Kleptocracy, Media

Death Penalty for Chinese Embezzler

// No Comments »

“China on Tuesday executed a former securities trader for embezzlement, the first person in the industry to be put to death, but millions of yuan are still missing, a state newspaper said.

Yang Yanming was sentenced to death in late 2005 and took the secret of the whereabouts of 65 million yuan ($9.52 million) of the misappropriated funds to his grave, the Beijing Evening News said.

The report added that Yang was the first person working in China’s securities sector to be executed.”

More here at News Daily.

Stories like these should alert us to the possibility that there may very well be mini-Madoffs (mini in absolute money terms only) all over the world, on which this recovery rests flimsily.

Posted in Kleptocracy

Danish Climate-Gate

December 7, 2009 // 1 Comment »

From the Washington Examiner:

“Police and authorities in several European countries are investigating scams worth billions of kroner, which all originate in the Danish quota register. The CO2 quotas are traded in other EU countries.

“Denmark’s quota register, which the Energy Agency within the Climate and Energy Ministry administers, is the largest in the world in terms of personal quota registrations. It is much easier to register here than in other countries, where it can take up to three months to be approved.

“Ekstra Bladet reporters have found examples of people using false addresses and companies that are in liquidation, which haven’t been removed from the register.

“One of the cases, which stems from the Danish register, involves fraud of more than 8 billion kroner. This case, in which nine people have been arrested, is being investigated in England.

“The market for CO2 trade has exploded in recent years and is worth an estimated 675 billion kroner globally.”

Posted in Globalization, Kleptocracy

Muckety Maps Barrick Gold-AIG Link

// No Comments »

Posted in Kleptocracy

Feds Suspected Rajaratnam Ten Years Ago

December 4, 2009 // No Comments »

Forbes has a report on an Intel engineer, Roomi Khan who cooperated with the Fed´s to avoid charges in a wire fraud case back in 2001- 2002. Apparently Rajaratnam was making money from inside information even then.

“According to a June 2002 sentencing memorandum for Khan, the earlier case arose after Intel suspected Rajaratnam was getting tips from an Intel insider because he was predicting Intel’s revenue “with extreme accuracy.”

Intel set up a hidden video camera that on March 6, 1998, recorded Khan, employed as a product marketing engineer at the company, faxing an important report concerning Intel’s three main Pentium processors to Rajaratnam.

The memo said Khan on March 24 then faxed handwritten pages that contained pricing information and sales data for Intel chips. “By multiplying those numbers, one can determine Intel’s total revenue for the quarter,” it said.”

Posted in Kleptocracy

UN Funds Missing Billion Plus in Climate Change Donations

December 3, 2009 // 1 Comment »

The Telegraph reported a few days ago that UN Funds were missing over a billion dollars contributed to tackle climate change in developing countries:

“A total of 20 nations pledged up to 410 million dollars (£247m) a year in 2001, resulting in a pot that should be worth well over 1.6 billion dollars (£963m).
But only 260m dollars (£157m) has been paid into two United Nations funds earmarked for the purpose according to the latest figures, the BBC World Service investigation said.
The EU told the broadcaster that the money was collected in ”bilateral and multilateral deals”, but was unable to provide data to back up the claim.
The sums were pledged in the 2001 Bonn Declaration, which was signed by the 15 countries that then made up the European Union, plus Canada, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway and Switzerland.

As of the end of September this year, the two UN funds - called the Least Developed Countries and Climate Change Funds - contained 155.4m dollars and 104.1m dollars respectively, the BBC said.
Boni Biagini, who runs the funds, told the broadcaster: ”These numbers don’t match the 410m per year. Otherwise, we’d be handling billions of dollars by now.”

Posted in Globalization, Kleptocracy

Swine Flu Cover-Up

November 4, 2009 // 1 Comment »

From Dr. Mercola, via Lew Rockwell:

In fact, worldwide, according to CDC and WHO data, far fewer people have died form H1N1 than any seasonal flu in the past.

Dr. Mercola also points out the following:

“Insurance companies in Australia would not insure doctors who gave the vaccine because it was a fast tracked vaccine and therefore experimental. They felt that the danger of complications was far too high to risk insuring the doctors. Unlike doctors in America, they did not have a special law that Congress would pass to insulate them from liability should severe complications arise from the vaccine.

It is also of special interest to note that tens of millions of babies were vaccinated with the Hepatitis B vaccine (providing no protection to the babies) only to learn later that it is linked to a 310% increased risk of developing multiple sclerosis. One has to ask — What else do they not know about this vaccine? …….

…Now we are being told that this new fast tracked, poorly tested vaccine is very safe and effective. The results of the testing on this vaccine were reported in the New England Journal of Medicine.39 It is instructive to learn that the tests for safety and to assess complications lasted only 7 days after the vaccine, an incredibly short period of follow-up. Gullian Barre paralysis can occur even months after a vaccine as can seizures, behavioral problems and neurodevelopmental disorders in children. It is interesting to note that the authors of the safety study for our swine flu vaccine were all employees of the maker of the vaccine CSL Biotherapeutics and eight held equity interest in the company. This admission is part of the disclosure policy of the New England Journal of Medicine.”

Posted in Kleptocracy, Psyops

DTCC Conflicts Of Interest Include Ties With Penson, Goldman

October 18, 2009 // 1 Comment »

More digging about Penson turns up a number of ties with regulators (this is probably par for the course, and not surprising). Penson Worldwide’s board of directors includes one David Kelly, who until 2000 was President of the National Securities Clearing Corporation, as well as Vice Chairman of DTCC.
More on DTCC here at Financial Wire, May 11, 2004
cited at Deep Capture.

(Lila : The DTCC is the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, not the Depository Trust Company, as indicated in the article)

“The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, a limited-purpose trust company under New York State banking law and a registered clearing agency with the SEC. The depository supposedly brings efficiency to the securities industry by retaining custody of some 2 million securities issues, effectively “dematerializing” most of them so that they exist only as electronic files rather than as countless pieces of paper. The depository also provides the services necessary for the maintenance of the securities it has in “custody.”

The largely unregulated DTC has become something of a defacto Czar presiding over the entire U.S. markets system, wielding more day-to-day influence and control than the SEC, the NASD and NASDAQ combined. And, as the SEC’s June 4 ruling indicates, its monopoly over the electronic trading system appears even to be protected.

How entrenched is the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.? It’s two preferred shareholders are the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, a regulatory agency that also owns the NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ) and the embattled American Stock Exchange! Regulators, regulate thyself?

In an era when corporate governance is the primary interest for the SEC and state regulators, the DTCC is hardly a role model. Its 21 directors represent a virtual litany of conflict:

They include Bradley Abelow, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS); Jonathan E. Beyman, Chief Information Officer, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH); Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President, Citigroup / Solomon Smith Barney’s Corporate Investment Bank (NYSE: C); Michael C. Bodson, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD); Gary Bullock, Global Head of Logistics, Infrastructure, UBS Investment Bank (NYSE: UBS); Stephen P. Casper, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Fischer Francis Trees & Watts, Inc.; Jill M. Considine,Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC);

Also, Paul F. Costello, President, Business Services Group, Wachovia Securities (NYSE: WB); John W. Cummings, Senior Vice President & Head of Global Technology & Services, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER); Donald F. Donahue, Chief Operating Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC); Norman Eaker, General Partner, Edward Jones; George Hrabovsky, President, Alliance Global Investors Service; Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange; Thomas J. McCrossan, Executive Vice President, State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT); Eileen K. Murray, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR); James P. Palermo, Vice Chairman, Mellon Financial Corporation (NYSE: MEL); Thomas J. Perna, Senior Executive Vice President, Financial Companies Services Sector of The Bank of New York (NYSE: BNY); Ronald Purpora, Chief Executive Officer, Garban LLC; Douglas Shulman, President, Regulatory Services and Operations, NASD; and Thompson M. Swayne, Executive Vice President, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).”

Posted in Kleptocracy

Muckety Maps George Soros

October 16, 2009 // 3 Comments »

Posted in Kleptocracy

Fraud On the Run: Goldman Cop On SEC Beat (ROTFLOL)

// No Comments »

In the news, to be filed under - What parallel universe does New York live in?:

“Oct. 16 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission named Adam Storch, a 29-year-old from Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s business intelligence unit, as the enforcement division’s first chief operating officer.

Storch, who joined the SEC Oct. 13, was named to the newly created post of managing executive in the enforcement unit, charged with making the division more efficient, the SEC said today in a statement. At New York-based Goldman Sachs, he had worked since 2004 in a unit at that reviewed contracts and transactions for signs of fraud.”

My Comment:

Personally, I’ve come to nurse a kind of contemptuous respect for, an appalled amusement at Goldman Sachs. It’s the contrarian in me.

In-your-face-corrupt, shameless, self-promoting, out-of-touch, sanctimonious, and bottomlessly greedy -  It’s a firm made for our times…

If Goldman Sachs didn’t exist, we’d have to invent it.

Posted in Finance, Kleptocracy

Taibbi’s Penson Video..(Correction)

October 11, 2009 // 2 Comments »

Correction:
(10/12/09, Monday)

I should have said “allegedly faked” video. I stand corrected. No weasel words, Mr. Byrne (see Byrne’s comment below).

I often post stories on which I have no comment or opinion one way or other, because I haven’t followed them, but think readers might like to. In my last several posts, in fact, I defended Deepcapture’s, Taibbi’s, and Zerohedge’s work, in spite of occasional alleged or real errors.

But the reason I linked to Wenzel’s blog is because Wenzel’s post is pretty funnily written, and I don’t follow Taibbi, except occasionally. I didn’t like his attacks on David Griffin, where he exposed himself as somewhat ignorant. Taibbi also doesn’t attribute people (apparently others have that complaint too). But arrogance and ignorance in one area don’t equate to being incorrect in another.

I’ll add a separate post with the rather long back and forth between Taibbi and his various critics and defenders. I went by Penson’s dismissal of the video, but I’ve since noted that Penson has some history that is troubling and tends to makes its dismissal less credible.

So what else might be construed as “weasel-worded” in my recent blogging?

Perhaps my rather neutral approach to the Byrne vs. Weiss feud, still going strong. Well, I’m neutral about it - who stalked whom, etc. etc. - because I don’t know the ins and outs of it. I had my own experience of being harassed, and can barely keep up with the details of that, let alone someone else’s stalking experience.

I also don’t know which of the two abuses of the market - “stock pumping and money laundering” (criticized by the Wall Street “captured” media) or “naked-shorting” (criticized by Byrne, Davidson “ “Bob O’Brien,” and many others, including Taibbi) - is the more momentous.

As a libertarian, I think naked-shorting is, but that’s only my opinion. Which is why I’ve been neutral. My sense is both abuses are real and extensive.

Likewise, I really don’t know enough about what the SEC’s investigation of Overstock is about. Could it be punitive?

Quite likely, given all we know about the SEC. But does that mean everything else the SEC does is incorrect? Unlikely.

Does that mean what Byrne wrote about “naked short selling” is incorrect? No.

Final point. I tend not to like shrill personal attacks.

That’s a deferral to civility and complexity, not weasel-wordedness.

ORIGINAL POST:

On Matt Taibbi getting suckered by a “faked” (quotes added for now) naked shorting video:

“Carney is a sharp guy, and he has Taibbi nailed on this one, but, I repeat, naked short selling, like a lot of Wall Street, is a very complex game. Carney in some of his other posts suggests there is nothing wrong with naked short-selling, he is off on that one. Some of it can be justified as simple market maker operations, but some of it is major league abuse by very clever insiders, which is the point Taibbi is taking, but doesn’t have the knowledge to back up properly.

Anyway, once you sit down an analyze the entire naked short selling thing, you realize that the bad naked short selling would go away if the SEC would stop issuing regulations that protect the bad guys. Basic common sense and commercial law would put an end to the bad naked short selling, real fast.

Bad naked short selling exists because there is a power source to manipulate, in this case the SEC, and the bad guys are running circles around the SEC.

What you want to understand naked short sales for yourself? Well pull up a chair, give yourself five hours and read this. It’s a great first step.

But, I tell you, it will be much more fun watching Taibbi attempt to pull the bayonet out of his brain.”

More by Robert Wenzel, at Economic Policy Journal.

Posted in Kleptocracy, Media

Berlusconi Immunity Thrown Out by Constitutional Court

October 7, 2009 // No Comments »

Italy’s top court, the Constitutional Court, has thrown out a law granting immunity from prosecution to the president, Silvio Berlusconi:

“The law overturned Wednesday was pushed through by Berlusconi’s conservative coalition in 2008 when he faced separate trials in Milan for corruption and tax fraud tied to his Mediaset broadcasting empire. It granted immunity from prosecution while in office to the country’s four top office holders — the premier, the president of the republic and the two parliament speakers.

The proceedings against Berlusconi were suspended as a result of the law, drawing accusations that it was tailor-made for the premier.

The corruption trial is particularly threatening because, in the meantime, the premier’s co-defendant has been convicted of accepting a bribe to lie in court to protect Berlusconi in another case.

Still, even if convicted, the premier would not be obliged to resign and could simply appeal, as sentences in Italy are usually not served until all avenues of appeal are exhausted.”

Posted in Kleptocracy

How the Pathocracy Stays In Power

October 5, 2009 // 2 Comments »

The question is often asked how a society that in its day-to-day workings exhibits culture and lawfulness can also support behavior at high levels that’s criminal. The question was asked of German society in the 1930s and could well be asked of the US today.

A good answer is given by Carolyn Baker

“One of the main factors to consider in terms of how a society can be taken over by a group of pathological deviants is that the psychopaths’ only limitation is the participation of susceptible individuals within that given society. Lobaczewski gives an average figure for the most active deviants of approximately 6% of a given population. (1% essential psychopaths and up to 5% other psychopathies and characteropathies.) The essential psychopath is at the center of the web. The others form the first tier of the psychopath’s control system.

The next tier of such a system is composed of individuals who were born normal, but are either already warped by long-term exposure to psychopathic material via familial or social influences, or who, through psychic weakness have chosen to meet the demands of psychopathy for their own selfish ends. Numerically, according to Lobaczewski, this group is about 12% of a given population under normal conditions.

So approximately 18% of any given population is active in the creation and imposition of a Pathocracy. The 6% group constitutes the Pathocratic nobility and the 12% group forms the new bourgeoisie, whose economic situation is the most advantageous.

When you understand the true nature of psychopathic influence, that it is conscienceless, emotionless, selfish, cold and calculating, and devoid of any moral or ethical standards, you are horrified, but at the same time everything suddenly begins to makes sense. Our society is ever more soulless because the people who lead it and who set the example are soulless - they literally have no conscience.

My Comment:

To this I will add that the pathocracy also exhibits and encourages the exhibition of sentiments that mimic and substitute for emotion. Various kinds of false sentimentalities and emotionalism mimic authentic emotion to create a facade that deceives the onlooker. One could go further and say that this distortion extends from the affective life to the cognitive, where a false and superficial “logic” takes the place of genuine reasoning….

Posted in Ideology, Kleptocracy

More on Zerohedge at the NY Post

October 1, 2009 // No Comments »

New York Magazine posted this on Sept. 27th, the same day I posted on ZeroHedge and the questions being raised about its principal writer. The piece answers a question I had, which was when did Zerohedge begin blogging? Spring, 2008. That’s about two years after my Goldman pieces… and several months after my round up on Goldman’s sins on Lew Rockwell (”Paulson Putsch and The Financial Disappearing Act of 2008 - when I claimed that Goldman was siphoning off profits).

Notice that I have done a few blog posts on Zerohedge and its credibility, asking when it began, shortly before this piece (scroll down and check out the post):

“Last spring, in a far corner of the Internet, an unknown blogger began to piece together a conspiracy theory: The investment bank Goldman Sachs was using sophisticated, high-speed computers to siphon hundreds of millions of dollars in illegitimate trading profits from the New York Stock Exchange, invisibly undercutting the market and sidestepping the regulatory reach of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Only a few loyal readers paid attention to the blog called Zero Hedge, a no-frills site full of arcane analysis decipherable only by finance professionals. But when a former Goldman Sachs computer programmer was arrested for allegedly stealing software codes used for the firm’s electronic trading arm, and a federal prosecutor was quoted saying the codes could be used to “manipulate markets in unfair ways,” the once-obscure blog ignited a chain reaction. While on a golf outing, an editor at the New York Times learned from a friend who worked on Wall Street that the Zero Hedge allegation was the talk of the industry, and an assignment ensued. On July 24, the Times published a front-page article on so-called high-frequency trading and its potential abuses, which in turn prompted Chuck Schumer, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, to draft a letter to the SEC that same day. Twelve days later, the SEC signaled that it was considering a ban on the very computerized trading that Zero Hedge had attacked….”

And, coincidentally, just after my long post on blogger credibility and naked short-selling, here’s Taibbi, with a HuffPo sneak peak at an upcoming piece on Goldman lobbying for “naked short selling.”

Well, he is on the money on that. It makes sense that GS would want naked short-selling to continue, via favored hedge funds. It’s the way the big boys control the market. Naked short-selling, as Taibbi correctly points out, is NOT short-selling.

We will forgive Taibbi for not attributing Byrne or anyone else, and also for profound ignorance about 9-11. Naked shorts have gotta go.

Meanwhile, Taibbi’s piece uses the term “captured” to describe the regulators being captive to the hedge funds. It’s curiously like  Byrne’s blog title, “Deep Capture.”

But with Taibbi, the focus shifts from the media’s subversion by the financial industry and centers more on the regulators’ subversion by the financiers.

How  is this important? One possible explanation: because increasing regulation is consonant with the establishment agenda. Exposing the media’s complicity with hedge funds isn’t. (Note: I think regulations are in order, but what kind, at what level, and with what safeguards against further corruption is the issue.. )

Correction (October 26): I’ve since had time to check more of Taibbi’s pieces and Byrne’s writing/interviews. It seems that in fact Byrne is mentioned far down in Taibbi’s piece - but not Bagley or Mitchell (which some might say is fair enough). Also, Byrne comes from a minarchist rather than a purely libertarian position, so that he too is interested in regulatory capture. In which case, Taibbi’s emphasis on the term seems in keeping with his sources and doesn’t constitute a “shift,” as I argued above.

Posted in Kleptocracy

The Fed’s Market Manipulation Scheme…

September 27, 2009 // No Comments »

The St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank has a document on file, marked confidential, taken from the papers of William McChesney Martin Jr. (Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve from 1951-1970, the longest tenure). The collection is housed at the Missouri Historical Society. The paper was discovered by researcher Elaine Supkis and is cited by James Turk at the Gold Anti-trust Action Committee’s website.

Note the following:

“There can be little question that the interconvertibility of gold and the dollar at a fixed price will have to remain the keystone of the international currency structure. At the same time, foreign exchange dealings by the United States monetary authorities, when judiciously applied, can serve to reduce capital flows, to dampen speculation, to minimize potential reserve effects, and hence, to minimize the impact on the United States gold stock.
The basic purpose of such operations would be to maintain confidence in the dollar* Foreign exchange operations would, of course, not be a substitute for other appropriate and basic actions to maintain the integrity of the dollar* but would serve as a highly useful and flexible addition to other monetary and fiscal policy measures..”

Posted in Kleptocracy

Golden Goose Down - IMF Gold Swaps

September 25, 2009 // 2 Comments »

GATA (The Gold Anti Trust Action Committee, the leading gold activist group that charges gold market manipulation) has just forced an admission from the Federal Reserve that it engaged in gold swaps.
In that context, I wanted to repost this old article of mine from three years ago, where I highlighted a news item that the media in the US had not bothered to cover:

Golden Goose Down: Was the IMF Involved in Gold Price Manipulation (Dissident Voice, June 8, 2006)

“The latest evidence is an IMF report that shows how IMF rules wink — if they do not actually blow kisses — at central banks which double count gold reserves they have actually lent out for sale in the open market.

Apparently, being a central bank means never having to say you’re short.

Aha, says GATA, which has charged all along that the IMF along with the US Federal Reserve and other government banks have done a financial two-step that has kept down gold prices until recently. The shady rules suggest that when they lent gold out for cash, the banks actually got to double their reserves by counting the leased gold as an asset too. Which means they got to lend, or sell, more gold than showed up on their books. That was pretty sweet both for the lenders — the central banks, who got a small return for their gold — and for the borrowers, the bullion banks that got to sell and reinvest the proceeds for a higher return in what’s called a carry trade.

Of course, it’s dollar holders who’ve done the real carry trade — carrying water for the lucky sods at both ends of the deal by clutching the ever diminishing paper that allows the lucrative game to go on at their expense. Sort of as if you or I or the rest of the peons who supply the tax funds for this financial musical chairs were to blow our money at Las Vegas and then write our losses down as collateral when we asked for a loan at the local credit union. Sounds good, huh?

Or as the IMF report admits delicately, IMF rules have encouraged overstating reserve assets because both the funds received from the gold swap and the gold are included in reserve assets.”

Posted in Finance, Kleptocracy

Vulture Funds Prey on Third World Debt..

September 22, 2009 // No Comments »

Johann Hari has a critical piece on “vulture funds” at The Independent that is sure to be polarising:

“Would you ever march up to a destitute African who is shivering with Aids and demand he “pay back” tens of thousands of pounds he didn’t borrow – with interest? I only ask because this is in effect happening, here, in British and American courts, time after time. Some of the richest people in the world are making profit margins of 500 per cent by shaking money out of the poorest people in the world – for debt they did not incur.

Here’s how it works. In the mid-1990s, a Republican businessman called Paul Singer invented a new type of hedge fund, quickly dubbed a “vulture fund.” They buy debts racked up years ago by the poorest countries on earth, almost always when they were run by kleptocratic dictators, before most of the current population was born. They buy it for small sums – as little as 10 per cent of its paper value – from the original holder and then take the poor country to court in Britain or the US to demand 100 per cent of the debt is repaid immediately, plus interest built up over years, and court costs.”

My Comment

I’ve been interested in these lucrative public-private philanthropic ventures for some time. “Doing good” has become the avenue for “doing well.” This is touted by some people as the “markets working for people.” But the markets work for…and against..people all on their own. They don’t need the bells and whistles of public philanthropy added.

And when philanthropy been added, as my earlier post on Jeffrey Levitt indicates, it’s usually been added for an ulterior motive. Thus Hari’s activism against vulture funds.

Having made that point, I have a few problems of my own with Hari’s post that I’ll come back later.

First, here’s a response from the object of Hari’s criticism -  one Michael Sheehan, the founder of Debt Advisory International (DAI) (which manages several vulture funds) and a Republican donor to George Bush’s campaigns.  Sheehan’s letter is cited by Felix Salmon at his Reuter’s blog. The crux is at the end:

“At the end of the day, then, the anti-vulture legislation will accomplish exactly the opposite of what it set out to do. It will have increased the debt burden of all HIPC countries, increased the cost of credit for all HIPC countries, increased the barriers to foreign direct investment for all HIPC countries and increased the amount that will be demanded from the OECD countries in support of aid budgets for all HIPC countries. There won’t be any savings. The costs will be in the billions and will be annual costs you won’t get rid of.
You will, of course, in the process have increased the power and leverage of the development set, but then that was the intention all along, wasn’t it.”

There’s more on Sheehan and the creator of the concept - Paul Singer - in this piece, which also sheds some light on just how influential vulture funds are:

“Debt Advisory International are very generous to their lobbyists in Washington. They have been paying $240,000 a year to the lobby firm Greenberg Traurig - although recently they jumped ship to another firm after Greenberg Traurig’s top lobbyist was put in jail.

Paul Singer has more direct political connections. He was the biggest donor to George Bush and the Republican cause in New York City - giving $1.7m since Bush started his first presidential campaign.”

Many of the debt purchases are also corrupt, as this BBC piece indicates:

“The Zambian deal with Donegal for instance involved an official in former President Frederick Chiluba’s administration who was later found - along with the president - to have stolen £23m from Zambia.”

From Third World Traveler come further details:

“The debt, originally owed to Romania for agricultural machinery and services, was accrued during the cold war. The amount claimed by Donegal was far more than Zambia is due to receive this year in debt relief - as agreed at the G8 meeting in Gleneagles in 2005. It is equivalent to more than six months of Zambia’s health budget.

Since qualifying for debt relief, Zambia has introduced free primary rural healthcare and announced plans to employ 4,500 teachers and hundreds of nurses. But one in three children in Zambia still does not go to primary school, nearly 80% do not receive secondary education and the average income is barely $1 a day. Donegal International’s claim threatens to undermine Zambia’s plans for poverty reduction.”

My Comment:

The vulture funds are, of course, behaving unconscionably. But moral outrage after the fact is less effective in stopping such things as not providing the incentives that entice unscrupulous people in the first place.

And these incentives are usually put in place by the state…in this case, by the global financial organizations, the IMF and World Bank, which were behind the economic policies that turned the once relatively prosperous country of Zambia into a basket-case, where half the population is malnourished.

So yes, the vulture funds are predators - but their predation is secondary and far smaller than the predation of the scavengers of the first order - the global managers whose “aid” has a strange way of devastating its recipients...

Posted in Empire, Finance, Globalization, Kleptocracy, Uncategorized

Johns Lanchester on Neo-Feudal Bad Times to Come

September 15, 2009 // 1 Comment »

John Lanchester in The London Review of Books cited by Chris Hedges at Truthdig:

“The cost of daily living, from buying food to getting medical care, will become difficult for all but a few as the dollar plunges. States and cities will see their pension funds drained and finally shut down. The government will be forced to sell off infrastructure, including roads and transport, to private corporations. We will be increasingly charged by privatized utilities—think Enron—for what was once regulated and subsidized. Commercial and private real estate will be worth less than half its current value. The negative equity that already plagues 25 percent of American homes will expand to include nearly all property owners. It will be difficult to borrow and impossible to sell real estate unless we accept massive losses. There will be block after block of empty stores and boarded-up houses. Foreclosures will be epidemic. There will be long lines at soup kitchens and many, many homeless. Our corporate-controlled media, already banal and trivial, will work overtime to anesthetize us with useless gossip, spectacles, sex, gratuitous violence, fear and tawdry junk politics. America will be composed of a large dispossessed underclass and a tiny empowered oligarchy that will run a ruthless and brutal system of neo-feudalism from secure compounds. Those who resist will be silenced, many by force. We will pay a terrible price, and we will pay this price soon, for the gross malfeasance of our power elite.”

Posted in Art and Ideas, Kleptocracy

End the Fed

// 1 Comment »

Posted in Kleptocracy, Pols and Pundits

Roubini and Taleb on Making Bankers Accountable, Feb 2009

September 9, 2009 // No Comments »

This is from February 09, 2009, shortly after the World Economic Forum at Davos in January, where they both spoke on the same topic - the financial crisis.

Posted in Kleptocracy

Major Market Move in Offing

September 7, 2009 // 2 Comments »

Looks like there’ll be a good deal of volatility ahead in the markets this coming week and through the fall:

*From Monday last week onward, New York has been riled up by the news out of China that Chinese SOEs (State Owned Enterprises) might walk away on derivative contracts that they think have been deeply manipulated. (They’re right on that). The SOEs involved are Air China, China Eastern, and Cosco.

*The derivatives are not mortgage-backed securities (the cause of the 2008 melt-down) but - likely- hedged oil futures in the OTC (over the counter) market, which is unregulated (that is, the SEOs hold synthetic longs).

*The threat - if it is that - has forced gold out of its summer trading range to within points of the $1000 mark, before falling back..and it pushed up the Chinese market by about 5%.(Sept 3)

*The counter-parties are 6 foreign banks, said to include Goldman Sachs, UBS, and JP Morgan. Goldman could take a hit on the contracts for around $15 billion, it’s rumored.

Note: The Chinese have been buying IMF bonds (50 billion) and watching the US meltdown and “stimulus” hocus-pocus with a good deal of warranted alarm, because all it means is their investments are being manipulated and driven down.

Obama’s reappointment of Bernanke was also taken as a bad sign by the Chinese. (correctly).

*Rumors have been swirling of further defaults of major US banks.

*The G20 has a preliminary meeting this weekend and the Chinese are said to have put the purchase of off-market gold on the table.

*The Chinese are pushing gold and silver on their populations, probably in anticipation of a currency meltdown.

*Meanwhile, Hong Kong has asked for all its gold to be returned from London.

*Last week, Germany asked for all its gold to be returned from London.

*Meanwhile, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and King County, Washington State have brought suit against Moody’s, S&P, and Morgan Stanley on fraud charges for the contracts they wrote, a case that would have massive implications for how other contracts are treated.

*[Oddly (?), Washington State is also where the earliest swine flu cases in the US were detected and where one of the largest outbreaks on campus just surfaced today - with some 2000 students at Washington State University coming down with the virus. Washington State had previously received large grants from Homeland Security for emergency preparations for pandemics, had TV Public Service Ads in place, had written up plans and practiced exercises].

Posted in Finance, Globalization, Kleptocracy

Judicial Watch on Nancy Pelosi’s Corruption

September 5, 2009 // No Comments »

Posted in Kleptocracy