LILA RAJIVA: The Mind-Body Politic
Individuals Not Ideologies
-
Mexican President Nominated For Citi Director
Robert Wenzel at Economic Policy Journal:
“Citi’s Board of Directors has nominated Ernesto Zedillo as a new non-management director candidate to stand for election at Citi’s annual shareholder meeting on April 20, 2010. He was the President of Mexico from 1994 to 2000 and is now Director of the Yale Center for the Study of Globalization and Professor in the Field of International Economics and Politics at Yale University.
Zedillo (58) worked at Mexico’s Central Bank (Banco de Mexico), serving in various positions, including those of deputy Head of Economic Research and deputy Director. Zedillo is on the boards of Alcoa Inc. and Procter & Gamble Company.
Obviously, despite the fact that it almost blew itself up because of schemes far from traditional banking, Citi continues to take the New World Order approach to banking.
There is nothing wrong with Citi attempting to penetrate into Latin America for business but, putting a former Mexican president on the board smacks of penetration via back door crony government deals versus attempting to serve the serve the consumer in the Latin American countries.
Sure, you have to deal with the crooked governments in these countries, but that’s what you have connected law firms for. They get things done in a very low key efficient manner. Putting Zedillo on the board sends a different signal, that Citi will not only deal with Latino politicians, but that it is part of the crooked club.”
Financiers Used 9-11 Diversion of FBI to Loot American Middle-Class
Great interview at Forbes, between Steve Forbes and Senator Ted Kaufman on the capital markets, naked short selling, the uptick rule, sponsored access, HFT (high frequency trading) and digitalization, dark pools, and fraud…
“Forbes: Finally, Fraud Enforcement Recovery Act.
Kaufman: Yeah, yeah.
Forbes: You’re proud of it.Kaufman: Yeah, I am.
Forbes: What it does, and what will it do?
Kaufman: OK, here’s what it did. After 9/11, we moved a lot of FBI agents over to cover terrorism, which we should have done. But we left only like 250 FBI agents in the country to cover financial fraud. We did more financial fraud cases in 2001 than we did in 2007, can you believe that? So, what we did with this financial and regulatory forum, with Pat Leahy, who is chairman of judiciary committee and Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican. It’s a bipartisan bill and we got a bill passed to give us more FBI agents, give us more prosecutors and to go after these folks. And so that’s basic what we passed, and we’re getting organized. Had a really good hearing of the judiciary committee. Rob Khuzami at the Securities Exchange Commission, Lanny Breuer’s head of the criminal division, Kevin [Perkins] from the FBI financial thing.
And we’re really, we’re going after this thing. And I know you agree with me. You know, if you, the folks that committed crimes while this thing was going on, we can all argue about what caused it or not, anybody who took advantage of this situation and lined their own pocket for it should go jail.”
Did Bethany McLean Even Break The Enron Story?
n “Enronathon,” Seth Mnookin of The Wall Street Journal suggests Bethany McLean wasn’t quite the first person to break the story of Enron…and that she had a good bit of unacknowledged help:
“If journalism were in the Olympics, the Enron story might well be pairs figure skating. Bethany McLean, the young Fortune writer who first wrote about Enron’s shady finances a year ago, has, of course, already been awarded the gold.
And with that have come the requisite endorsements: In the past two months, she was hired as a consultant by NBC News and shared in a $1.4 million deal to co-author a book on the scandal. But another team is also vying for top honors — amid complaints about shoddy judging.
Reporters and editors at the Wall Street Journal believe their work has been unjustly ignored, with some wondering whether Pulitzer rivals like the Washington Post and the New York Times have gone out of their way to praise McLean.
Enron did not collapse under its own weight,” says Jonathan Friedland, the Journal editor who’s been in charge of much of the paper’s Enron coverage. “Without our reporting, I don’t think any of this would have happened.”
In response, McLean’s former editor at Fortune and current Time Inc. editorial director John Huey says, “Bethany was the first journalist in a widely respected national publication to suggest that the emperor at Enron had no clothes.” (Not that her own publication took much note: Fortune had to airbrush out Kenneth Lay from a November SMARTEST PEOPLE WE KNOW cover photo.) Let’s recap: In September 2000, Jonathan Weil wrote a long story for the now-defunct Texas edition of the Journal about odd accounting at various Texas-based energy traders; it included four paragraphs on Enron.
James Chanos, a well-known short-seller who was one of the first to start unloading Enron stock, says he got interested in the company after reading Weil’s piece.
Almost six months later, in March 2001, the then 30-year-old McLean (who Times columnist Maureen Dowd has suggested will be played by Alicia Silverstone in the inevitable movie) wrote her little-noticed 2,400-word story, “Is Enron Overpriced?”
Then, in October, the Journal ran a three-day series by Rebecca Smith and John Emshwiller detailing Enron’s unorthodox partnerships. Their articles are seen by many on Wall Street as ultimately sinking the company. Weil’s partisans think he should get credit for crossing the finish line first (an item, “Credit Due,” ran in “Page Six” recently).
But even Chanos says that “Bethany’s piece was the first one to raise really specific questions.”
Most of the Journal’s brain trust, though, are plugging Smith and Emshwiller, who, of course, wrote their stories in 2001 and are thus eligible for this year’s Pulitzers. “The Fortune story basically said this is a company that nobody understands,” says Journal deputy managing editor Daniel Hertzberg. “It didn’t show what was wrong with the company. It took Becky and John to do that.” That’s the competition.
Now for the judging. In January, Howard Kurtz, the Washington Post’s media writer, highlighted McLean as the first journalist to ask questions about Enron. Ten days later, the Times‘ Felicity Barringer wrote her profile of “the financial reporter everyone loves to lionize.” While McLean was being anointed as a journalistic sex symbol in a story hitherto dominated by a balding Kenneth Lay, folks at the Journal felt they were being robbed:
“People are trying to queer the Pulitzer pitch for the Journal,” says one editor there. That’s sour grapes, counters Kurtz: “In this case, a 31-year-old reporter beat them and the rest of the world by a considerable margin.”
In a bit of circular logic endemic to media reporters, Kurtz adds, “I must have been onto something, since after my piece appeared, she was profiled in the Times, given a contract by NBC, and offered a book deal.” As for McLean, she seems slightly embarrassed by all the attention. “I’ve told people I’ve gotten too much credit,” she says. “I did raise alarm bells, but I didn’t know the half of it.” “Read more: Enronathon http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/media/features/5756/#ixzz0dvvQZvUI
My Comment:
Please note also that the book was co-authored with Peter Elkind, who isn’t attributed in many of the stories.
Not that I’m all that sympathetic to the Wall Street Journal on the Enron story, since they don’t give credit to the alternative press either, and what goes around comes around. (My own experiences of plagiarism from articles and books can be found at the tab, ABOUT - half-way down the page).
If liberal columnists steal without attribution even from liberal bloggers, can you imagine the cone of silence that descends when the victim isn’t liberal? Libertarians and conservatives get stripped clean by the vultures of the “free” (of all ethics) press.
With them, it’s never about public welfare or the good of the nation, even though that’s the standard that they like to foist on other people. Even with the global economy melting down under their noses, they’re jealous of sharing the information that activists, bloggers, and ordinary citizens give out generously for the common good.
(Again, there are honorable exceptions).
In short, they make up credit - just like the Federal Reserve.
Or they steal it - like their banker friends.
Or they collude with each other to “take-down” anyone not part of their game - just like their hedge-fund allies.
And no matter what, they always cover for each other.
Notice how other people’s personal lives are fair game for stalking, extortion, and exposes, but never theirs, as this piece on Maria Bartiromo suggests.
(Ms. McLean figures in that piece too. In fact, a brief google tells us that McLean´s had plagiarism problems and conflicts of interest more than a couple of times).
Item One. Here’s an earlier complaint about Fortune magazine plagiarism. A Fortune writer apparently used material from interviews and articles by an outfit called Annex Research, without attributing or acknowledging it. An email to Fortune got no response, either. The Fortune writer? Bethany McLean…
Item Two: McLean at it again, swiping material from the Orange County Register Weekly
Item Three: Libertarian economist, Bill Anderson, in a piece called “The Most Dishonest ´Journalists´ In the Room,” describes how McLean was having a romantic relationship with the lead prosecutor in the Enron trial, Sean Berkowitz, before the sentencing, while she was covering the trial and getting out the government´s side of the story. Omitted in that story as well was the disturbing fact that the prosecutor had suborned perjury in order to get a full conviction of Jeffrey Skilling.
And that´s besides Item Four….
That fetching stock-manipulation thing she had going with hedge buddies Marc Cohodes and Jim Chanos.
No wonder none of them can get the story right.
And no wonder they still won’t get it straight, not until after activists, or bloggers, or less-known writers at their own outfits or elsewhere do the hard work. Then they’ll slide in to take the credit.
Nice work.
Just as cushy and exploitative as anything on Wall Street, in its way.
Business men and real capitalists do the hard work of producing. Then the faux capitalist money-men and their shills in government rush in to cream the money off and cover themselves with glory via their mouthpieces in the shill media.
No wonder the media doesn’t understand capitalism. No wonder they love the crony capitalist bordello they call home. It’s the only one they know, the poor things.
[Again, they really ARE a minority of journalists, just a powerful minority. There are hundreds of honorable hard-working journalists who write their own stories rather than steal them off the net, whose names never get into headlines, and who wouldn't be caught dead behaving like this].
And don’t miss the other telling details:
Enron’s Ken Lay was a Republican.
Goldman Sachs is a Democrat cash-cow, for the most part.
Jim Chanos, hedge-fund master mind, used to work at Deutsch Bank.
And Bethany McLean was once a Goldman Sachs banker….. (Maybe that explains her kid-glove treatment of Hank at Vanity Fair).….
….And her equally interesting white-washing of Spyro Contogouris, who colluded with hedge funds to attack Prem Watsa’s Fairfax Financial.
Honestly. Rielle Hunter has nothing on any of these gold-diggers.
Sith-Lord Sweep: AG’s Pending Indictments Cover Major Hedgies, Journalists, and Regulators
Corporate finance generalist, investment banker and expert in derivatives, Austin Burrell, sums up last week’s announcement by Attorney-General Eric Holder that there are 5000 pending indictments [sic] arising out of the investigation of fraud in the capital markets:
[Note: the DOJ is involved in some 5000 odd cases of fraud related to the financial industry… (more…)
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Chair Berates Lloyd Blankfein
“It sounds like selling a car with faulty brakes and then buying an insurance policy” on the driver,”
– Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Chairman Phil Angelides (D) to Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein.
Well, well, well,
Doesn’t sound too different from what we said in September 2008, does it? (more…)
Hedge Funds: Top Ten Earners in 2007/2008
New York Magazine had a piece in 2007 that sorted the hedge-fund elites into categories like “brainiacs” (like James Simon and Jim Chanos) and “bad boys” (like Daniel Loeb).
The category “Top dogs” (that is, the very best hedgies) includes SAC Capital Advisers/Steven Cohen ($12 b); Cerberus Capital/Stephen Feinberg ($19.5 b); Appaloosa Mgt/David Tepper ($5.3 b); ESL/Eddie Lampert ($18 b); Citadel Investment Group/Kenneth Griffin ($13.5 b); Manhattan/Michael Novogratz ($4.6b).
[Note: the figures were as of 2007].
This is the short list of the managers whom the industry thinks are top dogs, and of these six, one (Feinberg) is directly connected to Drexel Burnham Lambert, convicted junk bond financier Michael Milken’s bank; another (Cohen) is connected indirectly to Milken through Gruntal & Co.; and three are alumni of Goldman Sachs(Tepper, Lampert, Novogratz).
Five out of six and that’s just a cursory examination. I didn’t do anything more than google to get that.
And the financial press thinks there are no Sith Lords?
A more conventional ranking is found below: (more…)
Too Big To Fail And Too Big-Headed To Admit Failing
In the Times of India, Abheek Barman reviews Andrew Sorkin’s “Too Big to Fail,” a blow-by-blow account of the bail-out and makes a couple of insightful observations:
“It’s a tribute to his writing that despite his ball-by-ball narrative Sorkin manages to hold your attention for nearly 550 pages. His character sketches are lean and unjudgemental. Yet, though he doesn’t pass judgement, by the end most of the characters - with the possible exception of Buffet and some of the regulators - come across as distinctly unsavoury.”
Xmarks’ Top 20 Corruption Sites List Includes Deep Capture
I just happened to notice this ranking of the most popular corruption sites and thought I’d post it as more evidence that the campaign against naked short selling isn’t some marginal “freak” show, as some of the financial blogs have tried to claim it is. (more…)
DTCC Board Stuffed With Kleptocrat Banks/Funds
The DTCC (Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation) is the largest depository in the world, and, along with its subsidiaries, the place where all transactions in equities, money market funds, corporate and muni bonds, MBSs and derivatives are cleared and settled. Activists have been demanding detailed release of trades which haven’t been settled or have failed to deliver (FTD), because of the obvious potential for manipulation, A glance at the board of directors, which consists of leading figures from the banks and funds, many of whom profited hugely from the government bail-out, shows that concern is amply warranted.
From Citizen Economists:
DTCC BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The DTCC’s board includes 20 directors.
Art Certosimo, Senior Executive VP, Bank of New York Mellon
Norman Malo, President and CEO, National Financial Services LLC; Fidelity Investments
Stephen P Casper, Partner, Vastardis Capital
Gerald A. Beeson, Senior Managing Director, COO. Citadel Investment Group
Donald F. Donahue, Chairman and CEO, DTCC
William B. Airnetti, President and COO, DTCC
J. Charles Cardona, CEO Bank of New York Mellon - Cash Investment Strategies, President of the Dreyfus Corporation
Randolph L. Cowen, Co-Chief Administrative Officer, Goldman Sachs Group Inc
Norman Eaker, CAO, Edward Jones
Timothy J. Theriault, President - Corporate & Institutional Services, Northern Trust Company
Neeraj Sahai, Managing Director and Global Business Head, Securities and Fund Services, Citi
Gerard La Rocca, Chief Administrative Officer, Americas Barclays Capital
David A. Weisbrod, Managing Director and Risk Executive, JP Morgan Chase Bank
Stephen Luparellyo, Vice Chairman and Senior Executive Vice President of Regulatory Operations, FINRA
Mark Alexander, Managing Director, Global Wealth and Investment Management - Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Head of Technology Operations, Broadcort Clearing
Ronald Purpora, ICAP Securities USA LLP
Robert Kaplan, Executive Vice President, State Street Bank and Trust Company
Michele Trogni, Managing Direcotr and Global Head of Operations, UBS Investment Bank
Ian Lowitt, Administrative Officer, Lehman BrotherSteve Cohen, Third Biggest Owner of Sotheby’s In 2009 (Corrected)
Modern Art Obsession has a post from April 2009 (see below) about Steve Cohen exhibiting a collection of his art at Sotheby’s, (where he is the third largest owner). The exhibition ran exactly at the same time as Sotheby´s Spring Modern and Contemporary Auction. The Cohen art was not for sale.
Quote:
“So.. we guess there are other ways to dump an art collection skin a cat.
Hmmm… Maybe the page from the Billionaire Art Opportunist Collector playbook could be :
- Step 1.. Buy lots of Art, push prices way up, and tell everyone who’ll listenin the media you’re a wise long term buyer.
- (Photo #1, Richard Prince, “Graduate Nurse, 2002″,Ink jet print and acrylic on canvas,89 in x 52 in. FYI… A description from Sotheby’s.. “This work is one of the best paintings Prince ever made, particularly because of its monumental scale and the rich, painterly quality of the brushstrokes”)
- Step 2.. Buy an art auction house (or a Whopping controlling interest in one),
- Step 3.. Stage a show of the great works having auction house experts tout your collection..
- Step 4..Tell everyone these art works, on proud display, are not for sale
- Step 5… Wait for someone stupid enough to say.. I wish I could have a collection like the one by this well known art collector, which just happens to be on display in the auction house.
- Step 6.. To be determined…. Hmm.. possibly.. Cash out..??
Note: Cohen’s SAC Capital amassed its position in Sotheby’s in the 6 months upto March 31, 2009, and Sotheby’s shares doubled by June 2009 from a low in February.
Correction (January 7, 1020): Cohen sold his stake in June:
The fund acquired its Sotheby’s stake between September and April, a period in which the auction house’s stock was battered by the financial crisis and a shrinking art market. The share price was below $10 for much of that period, down from a high of $61.40 at the end of the boom. This spring, the stock rebounded somewhat – it was $14.48 a share on June 30, so SAC’s sale of its roughly four million shares was likely to have netted several million dollars
Lazard-Freres Insider Trading Bust
I missed these arrests from back in mid-December:
“U.S. prosecutors filed criminal charges against a former Lazard Freres banker on Wednesday for alleged insider trading that earned him and others $500,000 in illegal profits.
The trading involved some of the highest profile deals during the leveraged buyout boom of 2005 to 2007, including the buyout of TXU Corp, as it was formerly known, for $44 billion, including debt.
The charges were brought against Adnan Zaman, a former vice president at Lazard Freres, in federal court in San Francisco.
Financial regulators also filed civil charges against him and Vinayak Gowrish, a former associate at private equity firm TPG Capital, saying the one-time fraternity brothers stole confidential stock tips and then passed them on to friends. In return, the men received cash kickbacks.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission settled the civil case with Zaman, who agreed to return $78,456 in ill-gotten gains and to be permanently barred from associating with any financial broker or dealer.
The SEC said that Gowrish and Zaman, friends since high school, tipped two friends, Pascal Vaghar and Sameer Khoury. Vaghar and Khoury also settled with the SEC.”
More at Reuters.
My Comments
Is it just me, or does there seem to be an awfully high number of desis (Hindi for home-boy).
What´s with these guys?
As a fellow desi, I have to hang my head. World-class education, world-class jobs, better than world-class salaries…and a world-class racket.
Warren Buffett To Promote Paulson Book
Now, we don´t want to read too much into this announcement, but, really, promoting Paulson´s book? What´s Buffett going to say?
I really really like that chapter where Hank had to take over the US government.…you know, after he pushed Bear Stearns and Lehman over with the help of his hedge-fund buddies…and all but nationalized housing.
Or
Gee, Hank´s into that cap-and-trade collectivist boondoggle that just got outed as a total rip-off and a fraud made up by climate change fanatics but hey, give the guy a break, will ya? We´re all capitalists here…..you know, like, state capitalists..wazza big deal?
Or
Yeah, I know. Vanity Fair, that bastion of free markets and free minds, already did its bit for Hank´s place in history when it got down on its knees and..um.. blew…up.. the guy into some kind of I´m-taking-on-the-slings-and-arrows-for-the-greater-good-profile-in-courage long before me, and yeah, Bethany did her bit for Hank too.. but every little effort counts…
I´ve had my doubts about Buffett´s involvement in the bail-out.
This doesn´t make them go away…
Janet Tavakoli Faces Off With Goldman On AIG CDOs
Janet Tavakoli in Market Watch
“Earlier, Goldman denied it could have known this was a problem, yet acknowledged I had warned about the grave risks at the time. If Goldman wants to stick to its story that it didn’t know the gun was loaded, then it is not in the public interest to rely on Goldman’s opinion about the greater risk it now poses to the global markets.
Goldman excuses its participation by saying its counterparties were sophisticated and had the resources to do their own research. This is a fair point if Goldman were defending itself in a lawsuit with a sophisticated investor trying to recover damages. It is not a valid point when discussing public funds that were used to bail out AIG, Goldman, and Goldman’s “customers.”
Goldman claims the portfolios were fully disclosed to its customers. Yet at the time of the AIG bailout, Goldman did not disclose the nature of its trades with AIG, and Goldman did not disclose these portfolios to the U.S. public. If it had, the public might have balked at the bailout.
The public is an unwilling majority owner in AIG, and public money was funneled directly to Goldman Sachs as a result of suspect activity. The circumstances of AIG’s crisis were extraordinary and without precedent. I maintain that the public is owed reparations, and it would be fair to make all of AIG’s counterparties buy back the CDOs at full price, and they can keep the discounted value themselves.”
Reverse Midas: SAC Spin-Offs Fail Even When They Succeed
Reading this report about SAC Capital by Reuters, I was struck by a few things.
But first, here’s the chronology (skip below for my argument):
- 1980s: Steven Cohen allegedly involved in insider trading at Gruntal
- 1999-2004, 2004-2007, 2007-2009: Insider trading at Spherix (ex-SAC trader Richard Lee’s own firm); and possibly at Stratix (founded by Goodman and Grodin in 2004, also ex-SAC traders, with SAC as a sizable investor); and (again, possibly) at SAC itself, by Richard Lee and Ali Far, also an alum of SAC.
- 2006: SEC investigates SAC and two other firms for manipulation of Fairfax Financial stock. Investigation dropped in 2007
- 2007-2009: Agent Kang investigates 20 hedge funds for insider trading
- 2007: SEC investigates SAC over Andrew Tong’s sex charges. Case sealed in 2008. Reopened in Nov. 2009, this time focusing on insider trading. About this time, Richard Grodin’s and Ian Goodman’s firm Stratix (where Lee and Far worked) closes. Grodin then begins Quadrum, which also closes
- Oct-Nov 2009: Galleon Group charged by Kang with insider trading and 14 traders arrested, including former SAC traders, Richard Lee and Ali Far
- Nov-Dec 2009: Cohen’s ex-wife alleges insider trading when Cohen was at Gruntal & Co. in the 1980s
- Dec. 2009: Ex-SAC trader and founder of Stratix Richard Grodin subpoenaed
**************************************************************************************************************
Now that you have that in mind, here are the things that struck me:
1. The high number of SAC traders who seem to have gone off into their own businesses.
You’d think with all that money and the fund’s record as the most consistently successful in the business (only one bad year on record), their traders would stay forever. Quite the opposite. People seem to have been leaving all the time to form their own businesses.
But SAC was also said to be a very tough environment. You produced, or you left.
So maybe that’s why Lee and Far, Grodin and Goodman, all left to found their own firms?
Could be. But I’m not convinced.2. None of the spin-off firms seems to have been very successful.
Why not? Why couldn’t these hot-shot traders make money on their own?
The Reuters piece suggests that perhaps the SAC experience didn’t foster business ability. And that perhaps SAC traders flounder without SAC’s huge supporting cast.
But those things are likely to be true of other firms as well, not solely SAC.
Still not convinced.
Furthermore, consider this.
3. A spin-off fund that didn’t get money from Cohen ended up quite successful:
“Healthcor, a healthcare industry focused fund, had raised $3.2 billion by June 2009 since launching four years ago. The fund returned 25 percent in 2006, 18 percent in 2007, and was up 4 percent last year, when the average hedge fund lost 19 percent. In the first 10 months of 2009, Healthcor was up 7 percent.
Healthcor, founded by Arthur Cohen and Joseph Healey, opened without any financial support from SAC. In fact, soon after Cohen and Healey struck out on their own, SAC sued the pair, accusing them of breaching their employment contracts. The matter ultimately was settled. (Healthcor’s Cohen is not related to SAC’s Cohen).”
4. Even spin-offs that were doing well were shut down.
When Stratix started in 2004, it had $60 million given to it by SAC. When it shut down, in 2007, it was up 17% and had $530 million under management. Yet it shut down. Why did it shut down? Those numbers sound pretty good.
Another spin-off, Fontana Capital, started out in 2005 with $50 million of SAC money. It grew to $325 million by 2006. But sometime in 2007, Cohen pulled out all his money. And in 2009, Fontana was down to $16.1 million, despite being down only 7.69%, compared to the average S&P Financial index loss of 57%. Again, that sounds like it wasn’t doing all that bad.
Reuters quotes someone familiar with the record of ex-SAC traders:
“So many of the ex-SAC people seem to have this model where they attract you with fantastic returns in the first year but in year two or three or four you get annihilated,” said a person who is familiar with several former SAC employees’ records.
Shades of Bernie Madoff….
Someone need to look closely at what happened to the money at these firms…
SEC Subpoenas Former SAC Trader Grodin
El Economista carries this Reuters report, dating from yesterday, Dec. 24, on the SEC´s subpoena of a former manager at Steven Cohen´s SAC Capital hedge-fund:
“Federal prosecutors in the Galleon Group case have sent a subpoena to a former employee of Steven A. Cohen’s SAC Capital Advisors, a sign that the scope of the problem into the largest hedge-fund insider trading case in history is expanding, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter.
The subpoena seeks trading records from a former SAC hedge fund manager, Richard Grodin, who employed a cooperating witness in the insider trading case announced last week, the Journal said.”
My Comment
It’s all getting pretty tangled, so first let me try to bring some order into the picture.
- I blogged, via Terri Buhl, that hedge-funds are going SAC-remote, deleting their email records and changing their trading positions so they don´t look too similar to Cohen´s, in anticipation of a probe. And now here come the subpoenas.
- The subpoena to Grodin arises out of the two-year FBI investigation of twenty hedge-funds that became public in October 2009 with the Galleon arrests.
- The investigation is headed by FBI agent B. J. Kang.
- Kang also led the probe into the alleged stock manipulation of Fairfax Financial in 2006, in which SAC was one of three hedge-funds involved.
- So far, Kang’s probe has led to a series of arrests of traders involved with Galleon Group in October and November, among them two former SAC traders. (A third, Mark Adams, is also suspected of insider trading).
- The two traders, Richard Choo-Beng Lee, and Ali Far, have admitted that they were involved in insider trading not only at their own fund Spherix, but going back to 1994. This makes it highly probable that they were also trading illegally at SAC, where Lee worked for about five years.
- Specifically, the agreement Far and Lee signed with the US Attorney’s Office charges conspiracies to commit insider trading from 2007-2009, from 2004-2007, and from 1999-2004.
- Galleon chief Raj Rajaratnam’s brother Rengan, who was investigated for insider trading at his firm Sedna, also worked for SAC in 2003.
- Lee is also going to be testifying about any insider trading he might have done at another firm, Stratix, which was founded by former SAC trader Richard Grodin, and yet another SAC alumnus, Ian Goodman.
- Stratix, whose investors include SAC (is your head whirling?), shut down in 2007.
- Then Grodin began another firm, Quadrum, which also shut down (”abruptly”, says Reuters).
- Also, in November, we had the bizarre revelations of Andrew Tong, who claims he was sodomized and forced into oral sex, cross-dressing, and the ingestion of female hormones (to make him the perfect androgynous trader) by his boss, SAC trader Ping Jiang. Investigated in 2007, the case was dismissed as lacking in substance. The records were sealed, leaving many people feeling that the SEC, as a Harvard paper recently confirmed, tends to go after smaller rather than bigger fish.
- But in November ‘09, the Tong case was opened again and given wide attention on the internet, this time with more attention to Tong’s claims that Ping Jiang forced him to into illegal trading that led to a $3 million loss. The loss was the reason SAC gave for Tong’s firing. But Tong himself claims that that was just an excuse and that the sexual harassment was the real reason. He also claims that Cohen knew what was going on and didn’t care, as long as money was being made. In keeping with the firm’s reputation for secrecy, Cohen made everyone sign confidentiality agreements and kept even top officers in the company out of the loop.
- These revelations have been followed by new charges made by Cohen´s ex-wife Patricia that her husband had cheated her out of money in their divorce settlement. Some of that money, she now claims, was hidden from the government and came from illegal insider-trading by Cohen was he was a young trader in the 1980s at Gruntal & Co., a shady brokerage with a history of embezzlement and scandal.
***************************************************************************************************************
NOTE:
**If you want to understand the modus operandi of one of these insider trading deals, read Deep Capture´s latest analysis. It displays some of the emails sent by certain hedge-funds that colluded with SAC in the manipulation of the stocks of Fairfax Financial, Jim Chanos´Kynikos and Third Point among them.
The Fairfax investigation (opened in 2006) petered out, but Deep Capture’s email collection nixes any chance that the record can be wiped clean by any of the funds involved (you can also see Bagley´s piece posted at Seeking Alpha).
Death Penalty for Chinese Embezzler
“China on Tuesday executed a former securities trader for embezzlement, the first person in the industry to be put to death, but millions of yuan are still missing, a state newspaper said.
Yang Yanming was sentenced to death in late 2005 and took the secret of the whereabouts of 65 million yuan ($9.52 million) of the misappropriated funds to his grave, the Beijing Evening News said.The report added that Yang was the first person working in China’s securities sector to be executed.”
More here at News Daily.
Stories like these should alert us to the possibility that there may very well be mini-Madoffs (mini in absolute money terms only) all over the world, on which this recovery rests flimsily.
Feds Suspected Rajaratnam Ten Years Ago
Forbes has a report on an Intel engineer, Roomi Khan who cooperated with the Fed´s to avoid charges in a wire fraud case back in 2001- 2002. Apparently Rajaratnam was making money from inside information even then.
“According to a June 2002 sentencing memorandum for Khan, the earlier case arose after Intel suspected Rajaratnam was getting tips from an Intel insider because he was predicting Intel’s revenue “with extreme accuracy.”
Intel set up a hidden video camera that on March 6, 1998, recorded Khan, employed as a product marketing engineer at the company, faxing an important report concerning Intel’s three main Pentium processors to Rajaratnam.
The memo said Khan on March 24 then faxed handwritten pages that contained pricing information and sales data for Intel chips. “By multiplying those numbers, one can determine Intel’s total revenue for the quarter,” it said.”
DTCC Conflicts Of Interest Include Ties With Penson, Goldman
More digging about Penson turns up a number of ties with regulators (this is probably par for the course, and not surprising). Penson Worldwide’s board of directors includes one David Kelly, who until 2000 was President of the National Securities Clearing Corporation, as well as Vice Chairman of DTCC.
More on DTCC here at Financial Wire, May 11, 2004
cited at Deep Capture.(Lila : The DTCC is the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, not the Depository Trust Company, as indicated in the article)
“The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, a limited-purpose trust company under New York State banking law and a registered clearing agency with the SEC. The depository supposedly brings efficiency to the securities industry by retaining custody of some 2 million securities issues, effectively “dematerializing” most of them so that they exist only as electronic files rather than as countless pieces of paper. The depository also provides the services necessary for the maintenance of the securities it has in “custody.”
The largely unregulated DTC has become something of a defacto Czar presiding over the entire U.S. markets system, wielding more day-to-day influence and control than the SEC, the NASD and NASDAQ combined. And, as the SEC’s June 4 ruling indicates, its monopoly over the electronic trading system appears even to be protected.
How entrenched is the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.? It’s two preferred shareholders are the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, a regulatory agency that also owns the NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ) and the embattled American Stock Exchange! Regulators, regulate thyself?
In an era when corporate governance is the primary interest for the SEC and state regulators, the DTCC is hardly a role model. Its 21 directors represent a virtual litany of conflict:
They include Bradley Abelow, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS); Jonathan E. Beyman, Chief Information Officer, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH); Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President, Citigroup / Solomon Smith Barney’s Corporate Investment Bank (NYSE: C); Michael C. Bodson, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD); Gary Bullock, Global Head of Logistics, Infrastructure, UBS Investment Bank (NYSE: UBS); Stephen P. Casper, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Fischer Francis Trees & Watts, Inc.; Jill M. Considine,Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC);
Also, Paul F. Costello, President, Business Services Group, Wachovia Securities (NYSE: WB); John W. Cummings, Senior Vice President & Head of Global Technology & Services, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER); Donald F. Donahue, Chief Operating Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC); Norman Eaker, General Partner, Edward Jones; George Hrabovsky, President, Alliance Global Investors Service; Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange; Thomas J. McCrossan, Executive Vice President, State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT); Eileen K. Murray, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR); James P. Palermo, Vice Chairman, Mellon Financial Corporation (NYSE: MEL); Thomas J. Perna, Senior Executive Vice President, Financial Companies Services Sector of The Bank of New York (NYSE: BNY); Ronald Purpora, Chief Executive Officer, Garban LLC; Douglas Shulman, President, Regulatory Services and Operations, NASD; and Thompson M. Swayne, Executive Vice President, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).”
Billionaire Nabbed In Largest Hedge Insider Scheme
In the news (:http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=asliefsvW5Zc)
“Oct. 16 (Bloomberg) — Raj Rajaratnam, the billionaire founder of Galleon Group, and ex-directors at a Bear Stearns Cos. hedge fund were among six people charged in a $20 million insider trading scheme federal prosecutors called the biggest ever involving hedge funds.
Also accused were Rajiv Goel, who worked at Intel Capital as a director in strategic investments, Anil Kumar, who worked as a director at McKinsey & Co., and IBM Corp. executive Robert Moffat. The former officials at Bear Stearns Asset Management are Danielle Chiesi and Mark Kurland, who were affiliated with the firm’s New Castle Partners, which managed about $1 billion.
“The defendants operated in a world of, you scratch my back, I’ll scratch your back,” U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan said at a press conference today. “Greed, sometimes, is not good.”
My Comment
The biggest hedge scam - there you go. Anything Westerners can do, Easterners can do better. We’re not going to settle for any penny-ante crime anymore. Now you know how at least one South Asian billionaire got rich so fast. Nothing like having an edge…
What’s interesting is that this is the first time that the Fed’s used wire-tapping to target insider trading on Wall Street. Until now that tool has been the reserve of organized crime and drug cases.
Fraud On the Run: Goldman Cop On SEC Beat (ROTFLOL)
In the news, to be filed under - What parallel universe does New York live in?:
“Oct. 16 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission named Adam Storch, a 29-year-old from Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s business intelligence unit, as the enforcement division’s first chief operating officer.
Storch, who joined the SEC Oct. 13, was named to the newly created post of managing executive in the enforcement unit, charged with making the division more efficient, the SEC said today in a statement. At New York-based Goldman Sachs, he had worked since 2004 in a unit at that reviewed contracts and transactions for signs of fraud.”
My Comment:
Personally, I’ve come to nurse a kind of contemptuous respect for, an appalled amusement at Goldman Sachs. It’s the contrarian in me.
In-your-face-corrupt, shameless, self-promoting, out-of-touch, sanctimonious, and bottomlessly greedy - It’s a firm made for our times…
If Goldman Sachs didn’t exist, we’d have to invent it.
Taibbi’s Penson Video..(Correction)
Correction:
(10/12/09, Monday)I should have said “allegedly faked” video. I stand corrected. No weasel words, Mr. Byrne (see Byrne’s comment below).
I often post stories on which I have no comment or opinion one way or other, because I haven’t followed them, but think readers might like to. In my last several posts, in fact, I defended Deepcapture’s, Taibbi’s, and Zerohedge’s work, in spite of occasional alleged or real errors.
But the reason I linked to Wenzel’s blog is because Wenzel’s post is pretty funnily written, and I don’t follow Taibbi, except occasionally. I didn’t like his attacks on David Griffin, where he exposed himself as somewhat ignorant. Taibbi also doesn’t attribute people (apparently others have that complaint too). But arrogance and ignorance in one area don’t equate to being incorrect in another.
I’ll add a separate post with the rather long back and forth between Taibbi and his various critics and defenders. I went by Penson’s dismissal of the video, but I’ve since noted that Penson has some history that is troubling and tends to makes its dismissal less credible.
So what else might be construed as “weasel-worded” in my recent blogging?
Perhaps my rather neutral approach to the Byrne vs. Weiss feud, still going strong. Well, I’m neutral about it - who stalked whom, etc. etc. - because I don’t know the ins and outs of it. I had my own experience of being harassed, and can barely keep up with the details of that, let alone someone else’s stalking experience.
I also don’t know which of the two abuses of the market - “stock pumping and money laundering” (criticized by the Wall Street “captured” media) or “naked-shorting” (criticized by Byrne, Davidson “ “Bob O’Brien,” and many others, including Taibbi) - is the more momentous.
As a libertarian, I think naked-shorting is, but that’s only my opinion. Which is why I’ve been neutral. My sense is both abuses are real and extensive.
Likewise, I really don’t know enough about what the SEC’s investigation of Overstock is about. Could it be punitive?
Quite likely, given all we know about the SEC. But does that mean everything else the SEC does is incorrect? Unlikely.
Does that mean what Byrne wrote about “naked short selling” is incorrect? No.
Final point. I tend not to like shrill personal attacks.
That’s a deferral to civility and complexity, not weasel-wordedness.
ORIGINAL POST:
On Matt Taibbi getting suckered by a “faked” (quotes added for now) naked shorting video:
“Carney is a sharp guy, and he has Taibbi nailed on this one, but, I repeat, naked short selling, like a lot of Wall Street, is a very complex game. Carney in some of his other posts suggests there is nothing wrong with naked short-selling, he is off on that one. Some of it can be justified as simple market maker operations, but some of it is major league abuse by very clever insiders, which is the point Taibbi is taking, but doesn’t have the knowledge to back up properly.
Anyway, once you sit down an analyze the entire naked short selling thing, you realize that the bad naked short selling would go away if the SEC would stop issuing regulations that protect the bad guys. Basic common sense and commercial law would put an end to the bad naked short selling, real fast.
Bad naked short selling exists because there is a power source to manipulate, in this case the SEC, and the bad guys are running circles around the SEC.
What you want to understand naked short sales for yourself? Well pull up a chair, give yourself five hours and read this. It’s a great first step.
But, I tell you, it will be much more fun watching Taibbi attempt to pull the bayonet out of his brain.”
More by Robert Wenzel, at Economic Policy Journal.
Berlusconi Immunity Thrown Out by Constitutional Court
Italy’s top court, the Constitutional Court, has thrown out a law granting immunity from prosecution to the president, Silvio Berlusconi:
“The law overturned Wednesday was pushed through by Berlusconi’s conservative coalition in 2008 when he faced separate trials in Milan for corruption and tax fraud tied to his Mediaset broadcasting empire. It granted immunity from prosecution while in office to the country’s four top office holders — the premier, the president of the republic and the two parliament speakers.
The proceedings against Berlusconi were suspended as a result of the law, drawing accusations that it was tailor-made for the premier.
The corruption trial is particularly threatening because, in the meantime, the premier’s co-defendant has been convicted of accepting a bribe to lie in court to protect Berlusconi in another case.
Still, even if convicted, the premier would not be obliged to resign and could simply appeal, as sentences in Italy are usually not served until all avenues of appeal are exhausted.”
How the Pathocracy Stays In Power
The question is often asked how a society that in its day-to-day workings exhibits culture and lawfulness can also support behavior at high levels that’s criminal. The question was asked of German society in the 1930s and could well be asked of the US today.
A good answer is given by Carolyn Baker
“One of the main factors to consider in terms of how a society can be taken over by a group of pathological deviants is that the psychopaths’ only limitation is the participation of susceptible individuals within that given society. Lobaczewski gives an average figure for the most active deviants of approximately 6% of a given population. (1% essential psychopaths and up to 5% other psychopathies and characteropathies.) The essential psychopath is at the center of the web. The others form the first tier of the psychopath’s control system.
The next tier of such a system is composed of individuals who were born normal, but are either already warped by long-term exposure to psychopathic material via familial or social influences, or who, through psychic weakness have chosen to meet the demands of psychopathy for their own selfish ends. Numerically, according to Lobaczewski, this group is about 12% of a given population under normal conditions.
So approximately 18% of any given population is active in the creation and imposition of a Pathocracy. The 6% group constitutes the Pathocratic nobility and the 12% group forms the new bourgeoisie, whose economic situation is the most advantageous.
When you understand the true nature of psychopathic influence, that it is conscienceless, emotionless, selfish, cold and calculating, and devoid of any moral or ethical standards, you are horrified, but at the same time everything suddenly begins to makes sense. Our society is ever more soulless because the people who lead it and who set the example are soulless - they literally have no conscience.
My Comment:
To this I will add that the pathocracy also exhibits and encourages the exhibition of sentiments that mimic and substitute for emotion. Various kinds of false sentimentalities and emotionalism mimic authentic emotion to create a facade that deceives the onlooker. One could go further and say that this distortion extends from the affective life to the cognitive, where a false and superficial “logic” takes the place of genuine reasoning….
Duvall ‘Fesses Up To Bark, Not Bite
Now Mike Duvall admits to “inappropriate story-telling” but denies having had an affair with either of the two lobbyists. That denial is seconded by Ms. Barsuglia. The man to whom he told the story now denies hearing it. He wasn’t paying attention, he says. Duvall talks a lot.
We were wondering ourselves…..
If the denials are accurate, it looks like Ms. Barsuglia and her family might have a case for defamation.
We’re all agog.
And we have another question: Just what level of IQ does it take to be a California assemblyman?
We’re all agog about that too.
Many’s the time we’ve seen a female employee slandered for no more than being more personable and competent than the males around her. Her career is then almost sure to be attributed to her sexual wiles.
If Duvall is any indication, there seem to be married men whose rich imaginations don’t come equipped with the ethical compass that tells them that dragging your associates into your adolescent fantasies does irreparable damage to their professional credibility and personal reputation.
If the denials hold water, Ms. Barsuglia should be paid substantially for the damage done to her career and her family’s sensibilities.
Of course, the denials may not hold water.
Major Market Move in Offing
Looks like there’ll be a good deal of volatility ahead in the markets this coming week and through the fall:
*From Monday last week onward, New York has been riled up by the news out of China that Chinese SOEs (State Owned Enterprises) might walk away on derivative contracts that they think have been deeply manipulated. (They’re right on that). The SOEs involved are Air China, China Eastern, and Cosco.
*The derivatives are not mortgage-backed securities (the cause of the 2008 melt-down) but - likely- hedged oil futures in the OTC (over the counter) market, which is unregulated (that is, the SEOs hold synthetic longs).
*The threat - if it is that - has forced gold out of its summer trading range to within points of the $1000 mark, before falling back..and it pushed up the Chinese market by about 5%.(Sept 3)
*The counter-parties are 6 foreign banks, said to include Goldman Sachs, UBS, and JP Morgan. Goldman could take a hit on the contracts for around $15 billion, it’s rumored.
Note: The Chinese have been buying IMF bonds (50 billion) and watching the US meltdown and “stimulus” hocus-pocus with a good deal of warranted alarm, because all it means is their investments are being manipulated and driven down.
Obama’s reappointment of Bernanke was also taken as a bad sign by the Chinese. (correctly).
*Rumors have been swirling of further defaults of major US banks.
*The G20 has a preliminary meeting this weekend and the Chinese are said to have put the purchase of off-market gold on the table.
*The Chinese are pushing gold and silver on their populations, probably in anticipation of a currency meltdown.
*Meanwhile, Hong Kong has asked for all its gold to be returned from London.
*Last week, Germany asked for all its gold to be returned from London.
*Meanwhile, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and King County, Washington State have brought suit against Moody’s, S&P, and Morgan Stanley on fraud charges for the contracts they wrote, a case that would have massive implications for how other contracts are treated.
*[Oddly (?), Washington State is also where the earliest swine flu cases in the US were detected and where one of the largest outbreaks on campus just surfaced today - with some 2000 students at Washington State University coming down with the virus. Washington State had previously received large grants from Homeland Security for emergency preparations for pandemics, had TV Public Service Ads in place, had written up plans and practiced exercises].
SEC Shuckin’ and Jivin’ on Madoff Report…
“U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff smelled something fishy in the August 3rd deal the SEC cooked up with Bank of America…….
That was the same view held by the Congressional questioners in the Madoff matter at the February 4, 2009 dust up with top SEC officials. After many rounds of pointed questions produced unresponsive answers, round tripper Andrew Vollmer, then Acting General Counsel of the SEC, explained why. He and his fellow SEC panelists were claiming executive privilege. This position elicited the following outburst from Congressman Ackerman: “Your value to us is useless…Our economy is in crisis, Mr. Vollmer. We thought the enemy was Mr. Madoff. I think it’s you…you were the shield…You come here and fumble through make believe answers that you concoct and attribute it to executive privilege….”
On April 2, 2009, another of Wall Street’s favorite law firms, WilmerHale, announced that Andrew Vollmer would be returning to the firm as a partner. According to the press release, before joining the SEC, Vollmer was a vice-chair of WilmerHale’s Securities Department…….
…And just what does the Madoff fraud have to do with the big firms on Wall Street? The multi billion dollar proceeds of the fraud were wired in and out of JPMorgan Chase where Madoff maintained his firm’s account. Also, Madoff partnered with Citigroup’s Smith Barney, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs to compete head on with the New York Stock Exchange in a venture called Primex Trading as reported here at CounterPunch on January 15, 2009.
Cliff Stearns Questions Hank Paulson..
How about a little less grilling of Sarah Palin and a little more of Hank Paulson? Notice how much Paulson stammers..
Pfizer Rapped With Largest Criminal Fine in US History
Pfizer is in the news, not for its take-over of rival Wyeth (the deal that Hamilton Project co-founder Roger Altman’s Evercore group was advising), but for getting nailed on civil and criminal charges relating to its drug promotion. A step in the right direction. Now, if we could just go after the insurance companies as thoroughly.
“WASHINGTON (AP) — Pfizer Inc., the world’s largest drug maker, will pay a record $2.3 billion civil and criminal penalty over unlawful prescription drug promotions. Announcing the settlement Wednesday, the Justice Department said that it included the largest criminal fine in U.S. history — $1.2 billion. The agreement also included a criminal forfeiture of $105 million.
Authorities called Pfizer a repeat offender, noting it is the fourth such settlement of government charges in the last decade. They said the government will monitor the company’s conduct for the next five years to rein in the abuses.To promote the drugs, authorities said Pfizer invited doctors to consultant meetings at resort locations, paying their expenses and providing perks. “They were entertained with golf, massages, and other activities,” said Mike Loucks, the U.S. attorney in Massachusetts.
Loucks said that even as Pfizer was negotiating deals on past misconduct, they were continuing to violate the very same laws with other drugs. Six corporate whisteblowers who first brought the misconduct to light will share $102 million of the settlement money.”
Progressives Seeing the Light On Obama
Believers waking up to the fact that they drank the kool-aid on Obama…
Madoff Feeder Funds Sued for Complicity in Fraud
After having said I won’t touch the Madoff story until my site gets a bit more protection, I
couldn’t resist this latest confirmation of something I said way back in December - that the feeder funds probably knew perfectly well what was going on and that “philanthropy” in many instances was just a cover for criminal activity or for misuse of funds. Note the similarity to the scandals at Fannie and Acorn, where the mandate to help poorer people get housing loans also provided moral cover for crime.One critic correctly points out that Madoff targeted charities, precisely because their pay out every year was only 5% of their capital. This was ideal for a Ponzi scheme, since it allowed Madoff to give out very little of what he took in each year.
“the American Jewish Congress which “defends Jewish interests at home and abroad through public policy advocacy using diplomacy, legislation and the courts.” It reported about 24 million dollars in assets, but only spends about 3 million dollars per year. At that rate, it could have continued its work through 2017 without further fundraising or investment income. Instead they invested their money with Bernie Madoff, losing 87% of the endowment!” [Who Made Off With Our Tzedakkah? Time to blame the victims," Daniel E. Loeb]
I told you back then that people who’d made out like bandits would be suing as though they were victims. How did I know that? Well - I taught high school. There’s nothing about human nature, good and bad, you don’t see there..
I know how well-heeled non-profits operate. Half the time, money meant to benefit children never gets to them. It ends up in the pockets of administrators, lawyers, and various salesmen and middlemen.
The whole educational/research establishment is rife with fraud of all kinds. Some of it is unintentional fraud - where the money gets to the intended recipient, although the activity of the recipient (the research or whatever else) is pretty much a dead-end or a waste. But in other cases, the fraud is intentional, as below.
Here’s the latest from Fox News:
“Also among those sued Tuesday is one of the leading educational philanthropies in the United States, which claims it was wiped out by Madoff’s far-reaching fraud.
The complaint filed Tuesday alleges the Picower Foundation and several related entities made nearly $7 billion by investing with Madoff. At least $5.1 billion of that came out of the pockets of victims of a giant Ponzi scheme, and should be returned, it [the complaint by court-appointed trustee Irving Picard] said.”
And more:
“The Palm Beach, Fla.-based foundation had given millions to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Human Rights First and the New York Public Library. It also funded diabetes research at Harvard Medical School.
The trustee’s Picower complaint says Madoff managed accounts that earned astronomical returns over 13 years. One purported to earn 950 percent in 1999.”
My Comment
Very different from the spin we first heard, right? Remember they were telling us back in January that the funds returned very average earnings and no one could be expected to have seen through the scheme? Turns out that that wasn’t quite the way it was. Nearly thousand percent returns? How hard is that to question?
This also confirms what I said in “Nationalization in a Time of Monopoly,” as well as in a later piece “Nightmare on Wall Street”: A lot of the fraud was committed at the height of the bubble economy and involved a number of players. [Note: Obviously, Picard's allegations are just that at the moment. We will have to wait and see how the suit plays out to get a better idea and hear more of the evidence on either side].
Far-fetched conspiracy theory?
Not at all. There are only a limited set of powerful actors at the highest levels of Wall Street. Bernie Madoff wasn’t a sidekick. He played at the top. The people at the top knew him (I mean, SEC honchos, leading bankers and money managers, government bigwigs). He didn’t do all this without a wink and a nod.
Which means there’s more going on here than meets even Picard’s eye. But until I get my site better protected, I’m not planning on digging any more…
Meanwhile, on the Madoff connection to the mob, there’s an interesting post at Deep Capture blog, which has this:
“After Milken was indicted, Black rallied to Milken’s defense. It was Black [Leon Black], more than anyone, who prevented Drexel from firing Milken. And Black has remained obstinately loyal to the criminal Milken ever since. After Milken went to prison, Black founded the Apollo Group, an investment partnership that received most of its initial funding from a French aristocrat named Rene Thierry Magon de La Villehuchet.
Among Black’s first moves as an independent “prominent investor” was to launch a takeover bid for Executive Life, a bankrupt insurance and financial services conglomerate…….Later, though, it emerged that Black’s takeover of Executive Life had been illegal because he had secretly been fronting for certain French investors, including Monsieur Rene Thierry de La Villehuchet. Some of the French investors had illegally parked stock with Black to hide their involvement (“parking stock” being one of the favorite techniques of the Milken-Boesky-Thorp crew, and a recurrent theme in the 98-count indictment that sent Milken to jail).”
The French aristocrat, Rene Thierry de la Villehuchet, was the manager of one of the Madoff feeder funds. He killed himself earlier this year, reportedly from a sense of honor toward his clients whose money was lost in the scam. But if the account at DeepCapture is to be believed, he seems to have been involved in rather shady deals even before getting together with Madoff.
Recent Comments